RICo: Reddit ideological communities

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100279
Kamalakkannan Ravi, Adan Ernesto Vela
{"title":"RICo: Reddit ideological communities","authors":"Kamalakkannan Ravi,&nbsp;Adan Ernesto Vela","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main objective of our research is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between language usage within different communities and delineating the ideological narratives. We focus specifically on utilizing Natural Language Processing techniques to identify underlying narratives in the coded or suggestive language employed by non-normative communities associated with targeted violence. Earlier studies addressed the detection of ideological affiliation through surveys, user studies, and a limited number based on the content of text articles, which still require label curation. Previous work addressed label curation by using ideological subreddits (<em>r/Liberal</em> and <em>r/Conservative</em> for Liberal and Conservative classes) to label the articles shared on those subreddits according to their prescribed ideologies, albeit with a limited dataset.</p><p>Building upon previous work, we use subreddit ideologies to categorize shared articles. In addition to the conservative and liberal classes, we introduce a new category called “Restricted” which encompasses text articles shared in subreddits that are restricted, privatized, or banned, such as <em>r/TheDonald</em>. The “Restricted” class encompasses posts tied to violence, regardless of conservative or liberal affiliations. Additionally, we augment our dataset with text articles from self-identified subreddits like <em>r/progressive</em> and <em>r/askaconservative</em> for the liberal and conservative classes, respectively. This results in an expanded dataset of 377,144 text articles, consisting of 72,488 liberal, 79,573 conservative, and 225,083 restricted class articles. Our goal is to analyze language variances in different ideological communities, investigate keyword relevance in labeling article orientations, especially in unseen cases (922,522 text articles), and delve into radicalized communities, conducting thorough analysis and interpretation of the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696424000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of our research is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between language usage within different communities and delineating the ideological narratives. We focus specifically on utilizing Natural Language Processing techniques to identify underlying narratives in the coded or suggestive language employed by non-normative communities associated with targeted violence. Earlier studies addressed the detection of ideological affiliation through surveys, user studies, and a limited number based on the content of text articles, which still require label curation. Previous work addressed label curation by using ideological subreddits (r/Liberal and r/Conservative for Liberal and Conservative classes) to label the articles shared on those subreddits according to their prescribed ideologies, albeit with a limited dataset.

Building upon previous work, we use subreddit ideologies to categorize shared articles. In addition to the conservative and liberal classes, we introduce a new category called “Restricted” which encompasses text articles shared in subreddits that are restricted, privatized, or banned, such as r/TheDonald. The “Restricted” class encompasses posts tied to violence, regardless of conservative or liberal affiliations. Additionally, we augment our dataset with text articles from self-identified subreddits like r/progressive and r/askaconservative for the liberal and conservative classes, respectively. This results in an expanded dataset of 377,144 text articles, consisting of 72,488 liberal, 79,573 conservative, and 225,083 restricted class articles. Our goal is to analyze language variances in different ideological communities, investigate keyword relevance in labeling article orientations, especially in unseen cases (922,522 text articles), and delve into radicalized communities, conducting thorough analysis and interpretation of the results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RICo:Reddit 意识形态社区
我们研究的主要目的是全面了解不同社区的语言使用与意识形态叙事之间的关系。我们特别关注利用自然语言处理技术来识别与定点暴力相关的非规范社群所使用的编码或暗示性语言中的潜在叙事。早期的研究通过调查、用户研究和少量基于文本文章内容的研究来检测意识形态从属关系,这些研究仍然需要对标签进行整理。之前的研究通过使用意识形态子红人区(r/Liberal 和 r/Conservative,分别代表自由派和保守派),根据规定的意识形态对这些子红人区上分享的文章进行标记,从而解决了标签整理问题,尽管数据集有限。除了保守派和自由派之外,我们还引入了一个名为 "受限 "的新类别,它包括在受限制、私有化或被禁止的子版块(如 r/TheDonald)中分享的文本文章。限制 "类包括与暴力相关的帖子,与保守派或自由派无关。此外,我们还为自由派和保守派分别添加了来自 r/progressive 和 r/askaconservative 等自我认同子论坛的文本文章,从而扩充了数据集。这样就得到了一个包含 377,144 篇文本文章的扩展数据集,其中包括 72,488 篇自由派文章、79,573 篇保守派文章和 225,083 篇限制级文章。我们的目标是分析不同意识形态社群的语言差异,研究关键词在标注文章取向时的相关性,尤其是在未见过的情况下(922,522 篇文本文章),并深入研究激进化社群,对结果进行全面分析和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1