Prescribing patterns of statins and associated factors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Worku Chekol Tassew , Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede , Agerie Mengistie Zeleke
{"title":"Prescribing patterns of statins and associated factors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Worku Chekol Tassew ,&nbsp;Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede ,&nbsp;Agerie Mengistie Zeleke","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2024.100297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In sub-Saharan African nations, there's a documented shortfall in the utilization of statins, despite established clinical guidelines advocating their use for reducing cardiovascular risks and overall mortality among Type 2 diabetes patients aged 40–75 years old. Most clinical guidelines recommend prescribing statins to individuals with type 2 diabetes to reduce the chances of cardiovascular disease. There is currently a lack of extensive research on statin utilization specifically for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Africa. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prescription patterns of statins for preventing cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The findings of the review were presented following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-2020) checklist. We conducted searches on electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, African Journal Online, and Google Scholar. This systematic review and meta-analysis included articles that met specific inclusion criteria: observational studies such as cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies focusing on determinants, risk factors, or correlates associated with statin prescription within Africa. Only published articles up to June 2, 2024, published in English, and conducted in either community or healthcare facility settings were considered. Data import was initially conducted using Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was performed using STATA software. Cochran's Q test was employed to assess whether there was a significant variance in prevalence among the studies. Additionally, the I<sup>2</sup> statistic was utilized to quantify the extent of heterogeneity. A funnel plot, a visual tool, was utilized to evaluate publication bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search strategy resulted in 7695 published original articles. The full texts of the 89 papers were assessed for eligibility and quality. Moreover, some articles were rejected due to inaccuracies in the outcome variable. Ultimately, only ten studies focusing on the prevalence of statin prescription were examined. The research suggests that the pooled prevalence of statin prescription among Type 2 diabetic individuals in Africa is found to be 48.82% (95% CI: 35.41–63.24). Age greater than 65 years (AOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.70–7.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 54.7%), comorbidity (AOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.27–4.63, I<sup>2</sup> = 96.4%), dyslipidemia (AOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.54–6.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 61.7%), DM duration greater than ten years (AOR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.81–2.28, I<sup>2</sup> = 77.3%), and government insurance (AOR = 8.85, 95% CI: 2.72–28.76, I<sup>2</sup> = 81.5%) were factors associated with statin prescription among type 2 diabetic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In general, the extent of statin prescriptions for individuals with type 2 diabetes who are eligible for statin therapy was below the target outlined by clinical practice guidelines. Being over 65 years old, having comorbidities, experiencing dyslipidemia, having type 2 diabetes for more than ten years, and having government insurance were all identified as independent factors predicting the prescription of statins. This finding is concerning and underscores the urgent need to enhance adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the well-being of this vulnerable population at high risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258993682400029X/pdfft?md5=2d2dfa7844f60362bf3c33e03fa5e59e&pid=1-s2.0-S258993682400029X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258993682400029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In sub-Saharan African nations, there's a documented shortfall in the utilization of statins, despite established clinical guidelines advocating their use for reducing cardiovascular risks and overall mortality among Type 2 diabetes patients aged 40–75 years old. Most clinical guidelines recommend prescribing statins to individuals with type 2 diabetes to reduce the chances of cardiovascular disease. There is currently a lack of extensive research on statin utilization specifically for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Africa. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prescription patterns of statins for preventing cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

The findings of the review were presented following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-2020) checklist. We conducted searches on electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, African Journal Online, and Google Scholar. This systematic review and meta-analysis included articles that met specific inclusion criteria: observational studies such as cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies focusing on determinants, risk factors, or correlates associated with statin prescription within Africa. Only published articles up to June 2, 2024, published in English, and conducted in either community or healthcare facility settings were considered. Data import was initially conducted using Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was performed using STATA software. Cochran's Q test was employed to assess whether there was a significant variance in prevalence among the studies. Additionally, the I2 statistic was utilized to quantify the extent of heterogeneity. A funnel plot, a visual tool, was utilized to evaluate publication bias.

Results

The search strategy resulted in 7695 published original articles. The full texts of the 89 papers were assessed for eligibility and quality. Moreover, some articles were rejected due to inaccuracies in the outcome variable. Ultimately, only ten studies focusing on the prevalence of statin prescription were examined. The research suggests that the pooled prevalence of statin prescription among Type 2 diabetic individuals in Africa is found to be 48.82% (95% CI: 35.41–63.24). Age greater than 65 years (AOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.70–7.45; I2 = 54.7%), comorbidity (AOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.27–4.63, I2 = 96.4%), dyslipidemia (AOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.54–6.44, I2 = 61.7%), DM duration greater than ten years (AOR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.81–2.28, I2 = 77.3%), and government insurance (AOR = 8.85, 95% CI: 2.72–28.76, I2 = 81.5%) were factors associated with statin prescription among type 2 diabetic patients.

Conclusions

In general, the extent of statin prescriptions for individuals with type 2 diabetes who are eligible for statin therapy was below the target outlined by clinical practice guidelines. Being over 65 years old, having comorbidities, experiencing dyslipidemia, having type 2 diabetes for more than ten years, and having government insurance were all identified as independent factors predicting the prescription of statins. This finding is concerning and underscores the urgent need to enhance adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the well-being of this vulnerable population at high risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲 2 型糖尿病患者的他汀类药物处方模式及相关因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景在撒哈拉以南非洲国家,尽管已有临床指南提倡使用他汀类药物来降低心血管风险和 40-75 岁 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率,但有记录表明他汀类药物的使用率仍然很低。大多数临床指南都建议为 2 型糖尿病患者开具他汀类药物处方,以降低罹患心血管疾病的几率。目前,非洲还缺乏关于他汀类药物用于心血管疾病一级预防的广泛研究。因此,本研究旨在评估他汀类药物在 2 型糖尿病患者中预防心血管疾病的处方模式。方法综述结果按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA-2020)核对表中列出的指南进行阐述。我们在电子数据库中进行了检索,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Science Direct、African Journal Online 和 Google Scholar。本系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了符合特定纳入标准的文章:观察性研究,如横断面研究、队列研究和病例对照研究,侧重于非洲他汀类药物处方的决定因素、风险因素或相关因素。仅考虑截至 2024 年 6 月 2 日以英语发表的、在社区或医疗机构环境中进行的文章。最初使用 Microsoft Excel 进行数据导入,并使用 STATA 软件进行统计分析。采用 Cochran's Q 检验来评估各研究的患病率是否存在显著差异。此外,还利用 I2 统计量来量化异质性的程度。漏斗图是一种可视化工具,用于评估发表偏倚。对 89 篇论文的全文进行了资格和质量评估。此外,一些文章因结果变量不准确而被剔除。最终,只对 10 篇关注他汀类药物处方流行率的研究进行了审查。研究表明,他汀类药物处方在非洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的集中流行率为 48.82%(95% CI:35.41-63.24)。年龄大于 65 岁(AOR = 3.56,95% CI:1.70-7.45;I2 = 54.7%)、合并症(AOR = 1.13,95% CI:0.27-4.63,I2 = 96.4%)、血脂异常(AOR = 3.15,95% CI:1.54-6.44,I2 = 61.7%)、DM 病程超过 10 年(AOR = 1.36,95% CI:0.81-2.28,I2 = 77.3%)和政府保险(AOR = 8.结论总体而言,符合他汀类药物治疗条件的 2 型糖尿病患者的他汀类药物处方量低于临床实践指南规定的目标。65岁以上、合并症、血脂异常、2型糖尿病病史超过10年以及拥有政府保险都是预测他汀类药物处方的独立因素。这一研究结果令人担忧,并强调为了这一高风险弱势群体的福祉,迫切需要加强对临床实践指南的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the mechanisms and effects of hyperglycemia on skeletal muscle atrophy Outdoor environment and obesity: A review of current evidence Understanding the impact of diabetes on bone health: A clinical review Impact of allulose on blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of clinical trials The role of novel inflammation-associated biomarkers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1