Estimating pre-impact and post-impact evacuation behaviors – An empirical study of hurricane Ida in coastal Louisiana and Mississippi

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103925
Jiayun Shen , Pamela Murray-Tuite , Kris Wernstedt , Seth Guikema
{"title":"Estimating pre-impact and post-impact evacuation behaviors – An empirical study of hurricane Ida in coastal Louisiana and Mississippi","authors":"Jiayun Shen ,&nbsp;Pamela Murray-Tuite ,&nbsp;Kris Wernstedt ,&nbsp;Seth Guikema","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evacuation after hurricane impacts appear (post-impact evacuation) has been underemphasized in empirical evacuation studies. This study uses well-examined factors for pre-impact evacuation and novel factors for post-impact evacuation in a sequential logit model for pre- and post-impact evacuation choices. Results show that the evacuation warning is the only factor that affected both pre-impact and post-impact evacuations. Demographics and housing characteristics are significant factors for pre-impact evacuation but not for post-impact evacuation, while residential damages and durations of utility outages are significant situational factors for post-impact evacuation. The durations of water and power outages had additive effects on the probability of evacuating after hurricane impact. Based on the results, we argue that the conventional assumption that sheltered-in-place residents will remain in the affected area, and the restoration planning and assistance generated with that premise will not be aligned with the demand of residents facing inhabitable living situations with damaged residences and prolonged utility outages. Agencies should consider extending the evacuation planning time horizon for storm events likely to induce severe damages and outages and prepare for evacuation during disrupted conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103925"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evacuation after hurricane impacts appear (post-impact evacuation) has been underemphasized in empirical evacuation studies. This study uses well-examined factors for pre-impact evacuation and novel factors for post-impact evacuation in a sequential logit model for pre- and post-impact evacuation choices. Results show that the evacuation warning is the only factor that affected both pre-impact and post-impact evacuations. Demographics and housing characteristics are significant factors for pre-impact evacuation but not for post-impact evacuation, while residential damages and durations of utility outages are significant situational factors for post-impact evacuation. The durations of water and power outages had additive effects on the probability of evacuating after hurricane impact. Based on the results, we argue that the conventional assumption that sheltered-in-place residents will remain in the affected area, and the restoration planning and assistance generated with that premise will not be aligned with the demand of residents facing inhabitable living situations with damaged residences and prolonged utility outages. Agencies should consider extending the evacuation planning time horizon for storm events likely to induce severe damages and outages and prepare for evacuation during disrupted conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计飓风影响前和影响后的疏散行为--对路易斯安那州和密西西比州沿海地区飓风艾达的实证研究
在经验性撤离研究中,飓风影响出现后的撤离(影响后撤离)一直未得到足够重视。本研究在一个顺序对数模型中使用了影响前疏散的成熟因素和影响后疏散的新因素,用于影响前和影响后的疏散选择。结果表明,疏散警报是唯一一个同时影响影响前和影响后疏散的因素。人口统计和住房特征是影响影响前撤离的重要因素,但不是影响影响后撤离的重要因素,而住宅损坏和水电供应中断持续时间则是影响影响后撤离的重要情境因素。停水和停电的持续时间对飓风影响后撤离的概率具有叠加效应。根据研究结果,我们认为,传统的假设是原地避难的居民将留在灾区,在此前提下产生的恢复规划和援助将无法满足面临住宅受损、水电长期中断等无法居住的居民的需求。对于可能造成严重破坏和停电的风暴事件,各机构应考虑延长疏散规划的时间范围,并为在中断条件下的疏散做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board What determines travel time and distance decay in spatial interaction and accessibility? Development and application of an optimization model to evaluate future charging demand for long-haul electric vehicles in Ontario, Canada Coverage vs frequency: Is spatial coverage or temporal frequency more impactful on transit ridership? Daily activity-travel pattern identification using natural language processing and semantic matching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1