Risk of agranulocytosis with metamizole in comparison with alternative medications based on health records in Spain.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s00228-024-03706-5
Miguel-Ángel Maciá-Martínez, Belén Castillo-Cano, Patricia García-Poza, Elisa Martín-Merino
{"title":"Risk of agranulocytosis with metamizole in comparison with alternative medications based on health records in Spain.","authors":"Miguel-Ángel Maciá-Martínez, Belén Castillo-Cano, Patricia García-Poza, Elisa Martín-Merino","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03706-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to estimate the absolute (incidence) and relative (hazard ratio; HR) risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in comparison with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study of new users of metamizole versus NSAIDs was performed with BIFAP (Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Database in Public Health Systems; Spain). Patients aged ≥ 2 years in 2005-2022 were followed up from the day after their first metamizole or NSAID dispensation till the end of the treatment period to identify patients hospitalized due to idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Incidence rate (IR) and adjusted HR of agranulocytosis with metamizole versus NSAID were estimated assuming the onset date of agranulocytosis was the date of hospitalization sensitivity analysis or 7 days before (main analysis). In secondary analyses, we used (1) opioids-paracetamol as negative control and (2) any hospitalized neutropenia as outcome (assuming the onset was 7 days before).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohorts included 444,972 new users of metamizole, 3,814,367 NSAID, and 3,129,221 opioids-paracetamol on continuous treatment during a median of 37-40 days. Overall, 26 hospitalized agranulocytosis occurred, 5 in the first week (and so removed in main analysis) and 21 thereafter. IR of agranulocytosis was 14.20 (N = 5 cases) and 8.52 (N = 3), 1.95 (N = 6) and 1.62 (N = 5), and 4.29 (N = 15) and 3.72 (N = 13)/10<sup>7</sup> person-weeks of continuous treatment using the date of hospitalization or 7 days before, respectively. Two, 0 and 2 of cases identified in both analyses had neoplasia in every cohort, respectively. HR of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole was 7.20 [95% CI: 1.92-26.99] and 4.40 [0.90-21.57] versus NSAID, and 3.31 [1.17-9.34] and 2.45 [0.68-8.83] versus opioid-paracetamol, respectively. HR of neutropenia with metamizole was 2.98 [1.57-5.65] versus NSAID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agranulocytosis was very rare but more common (above 4 times more) with metamizole than other analgesics. The impact of the drug-induced agranulocytosis was less precise with metamizole than the comparators due to its lower use, which precluded to find statistical differences in main analysis. The increased risk of hospitalized neutropenias with metamizole supports the link with its severity although triggers unavailable during the follow-up (ex. cytotoxic medication) can not be discarded.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03706-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to estimate the absolute (incidence) and relative (hazard ratio; HR) risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in comparison with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Methods: A cohort study of new users of metamizole versus NSAIDs was performed with BIFAP (Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Database in Public Health Systems; Spain). Patients aged ≥ 2 years in 2005-2022 were followed up from the day after their first metamizole or NSAID dispensation till the end of the treatment period to identify patients hospitalized due to idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Incidence rate (IR) and adjusted HR of agranulocytosis with metamizole versus NSAID were estimated assuming the onset date of agranulocytosis was the date of hospitalization sensitivity analysis or 7 days before (main analysis). In secondary analyses, we used (1) opioids-paracetamol as negative control and (2) any hospitalized neutropenia as outcome (assuming the onset was 7 days before).

Results: The cohorts included 444,972 new users of metamizole, 3,814,367 NSAID, and 3,129,221 opioids-paracetamol on continuous treatment during a median of 37-40 days. Overall, 26 hospitalized agranulocytosis occurred, 5 in the first week (and so removed in main analysis) and 21 thereafter. IR of agranulocytosis was 14.20 (N = 5 cases) and 8.52 (N = 3), 1.95 (N = 6) and 1.62 (N = 5), and 4.29 (N = 15) and 3.72 (N = 13)/107 person-weeks of continuous treatment using the date of hospitalization or 7 days before, respectively. Two, 0 and 2 of cases identified in both analyses had neoplasia in every cohort, respectively. HR of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole was 7.20 [95% CI: 1.92-26.99] and 4.40 [0.90-21.57] versus NSAID, and 3.31 [1.17-9.34] and 2.45 [0.68-8.83] versus opioid-paracetamol, respectively. HR of neutropenia with metamizole was 2.98 [1.57-5.65] versus NSAID.

Conclusions: Agranulocytosis was very rare but more common (above 4 times more) with metamizole than other analgesics. The impact of the drug-induced agranulocytosis was less precise with metamizole than the comparators due to its lower use, which precluded to find statistical differences in main analysis. The increased risk of hospitalized neutropenias with metamizole supports the link with its severity although triggers unavailable during the follow-up (ex. cytotoxic medication) can not be discarded.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据西班牙的健康记录,比较使用甲氰咪唑和其他药物发生粒细胞减少症的风险。
目的:我们旨在估算甲氰咪唑与非类固醇抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比发生粒细胞减少症的绝对风险(发生率)和相对风险(危险比;HR):方法:通过 BIFAP(西班牙公共卫生系统药物流行病学研究数据库)对新用户使用甲硝唑和非甾体抗炎药进行了队列研究。研究人员对 2005-2022 年间年龄≥2 岁的患者进行了随访,随访时间从首次使用甲硝咪唑或非甾体抗炎药的次日开始,直至治疗期结束,以确定因特异性粒细胞减少症住院的患者。假设粒细胞减少的发病日期为敏感性分析的住院日期或 7 天前(主要分析),则估算出使用甲氰咪唑与使用非甾体抗炎药治疗粒细胞减少的发病率(IR)和调整后 HR。在次要分析中,我们使用(1)阿片类药物-扑热息痛作为阴性对照;(2)任何住院中性粒细胞减少症作为结果(假设发病日期为 7 天前):队列中包括 444,972 名使用甲硝唑、3,814,367 名使用非甾体抗炎药和 3,129,221 名使用阿片类药物-扑热息痛的新患者,持续治疗时间中位数为 37-40 天。总计发生了 26 例粒细胞减少住院病例,其中 5 例发生在第一周(因此在主要分析中删除),其后发生了 21 例。以住院日期或 7 天前为标准,粒细胞减少的 IR 分别为 14.20(5 例)和 8.52(3 例),1.95(6 例)和 1.62(5 例),4.29(15 例)和 3.72(13 例)/107 人周。在两项分析中发现的病例中,每个队列中分别有 2 例、0 例和 2 例出现肿瘤。与非甾类抗炎药相比,甲氰咪胍引起粒细胞减少的 HR 分别为 7.20 [95% CI:1.92-26.99] 和 4.40 [0.90-21.57];与阿片类-扑热息痛相比,分别为 3.31 [1.17-9.34] 和 2.45 [0.68-8.83]。美他咪唑与非甾类抗炎药相比,中性粒细胞减少的HR值为2.98 [1.57-5.65] :结论:粒细胞减少症非常罕见,但使用甲氰咪唑比使用其他镇痛药更常见(高出4倍以上)。由于美他咪唑的使用率较低,因此其对药物引起的粒细胞减少症的影响不如对比药那么精确,这就导致在主要分析中无法找到统计学差异。尽管不能排除随访期间无法获得的诱因(如细胞毒性药物),但使用甲氰咪唑后中性粒细胞减少症的住院风险增加证明了其严重程度与中性粒细胞减少症有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1