{"title":"High-resolution Serotyping Reveals Salmonella Surveillance Challenges in the Turkey Industry","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite extensive <em>Salmonella</em> controls used at processing, 5.5% of salmonellosis cases are linked to turkey. This study had two objectives: (i) to summarize USDA-FSIS turkey <em>Salmonella</em> verification program data and (ii) to evaluate <em>Salmonella</em> through turkey production and processing of 22 flocks. In objective 1, USDA-FSIS data show the average <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence in ground turkey from 2016 to 2022 was 15.9%, and that the leading serovar changes frequently. For objective 2, bootsocks (<em>n</em> = 22) were collected on-farm right after load-out. At processing, prescald wingtips (<em>n</em> = 6 composites of 10/flock), prechill wingtips (<em>n</em> = 6 composites of 10/flock), mechanically separated turkey (MST; <em>n</em> = 6 bins/flock), and ground turkey (<em>n</em> = 6 bins/flock) were collected. <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence was determined by a commercial qPCR and culture confirmed. In 33.2% of PCR-positive samples, <em>Salmonella</em> was not confirmed by culture, highlighting a discrepancy between molecular and culture detection. On-farm, 8/22 flocks were <em>Salmonella</em> positive, compared to 21 flocks that were positive at one or more processing locations, including 18 flocks that were positive in at least one final product sample. A logistic regression showed higher <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence in prescald (53.8%) than in prechill (18.2%), MST (27.3%) or ground turkey (26.5%). CRISPR-SeroSeq analysis of 148 culture−positive samples detected 18 <em>Salmonella</em> serovars and showed 35.1% of samples contained multiple serovars. In 16 flocks, one or more serovars detected in final products were absent from any upstream samples. Two−thirds of final product samples containing serovar Typhimurium typed as a live-attenuated Typhimurium vaccine strain. <em>Salmonella</em> on-farm and at prescald did not reflect <em>Salmonella</em> observed in final product. These data underscore the complexity of serovar tracking in turkey production and highlight challenges to identify surveillance samples that accurately represent <em>Salmonella</em> in turkey products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 10","pages":"Article 100319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001030/pdfft?md5=0b35d084176ba955d14b40b9fde3ba53&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24001030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite extensive Salmonella controls used at processing, 5.5% of salmonellosis cases are linked to turkey. This study had two objectives: (i) to summarize USDA-FSIS turkey Salmonella verification program data and (ii) to evaluate Salmonella through turkey production and processing of 22 flocks. In objective 1, USDA-FSIS data show the average Salmonella prevalence in ground turkey from 2016 to 2022 was 15.9%, and that the leading serovar changes frequently. For objective 2, bootsocks (n = 22) were collected on-farm right after load-out. At processing, prescald wingtips (n = 6 composites of 10/flock), prechill wingtips (n = 6 composites of 10/flock), mechanically separated turkey (MST; n = 6 bins/flock), and ground turkey (n = 6 bins/flock) were collected. Salmonella prevalence was determined by a commercial qPCR and culture confirmed. In 33.2% of PCR-positive samples, Salmonella was not confirmed by culture, highlighting a discrepancy between molecular and culture detection. On-farm, 8/22 flocks were Salmonella positive, compared to 21 flocks that were positive at one or more processing locations, including 18 flocks that were positive in at least one final product sample. A logistic regression showed higher Salmonella prevalence in prescald (53.8%) than in prechill (18.2%), MST (27.3%) or ground turkey (26.5%). CRISPR-SeroSeq analysis of 148 culture−positive samples detected 18 Salmonella serovars and showed 35.1% of samples contained multiple serovars. In 16 flocks, one or more serovars detected in final products were absent from any upstream samples. Two−thirds of final product samples containing serovar Typhimurium typed as a live-attenuated Typhimurium vaccine strain. Salmonella on-farm and at prescald did not reflect Salmonella observed in final product. These data underscore the complexity of serovar tracking in turkey production and highlight challenges to identify surveillance samples that accurately represent Salmonella in turkey products.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.