Normal hearing and verbal discrimination in real sounds environments.

Adriana Lodeiro Colatosti, Ignacio Pla Gil, Antonio Morant Ventura, Emilia Latorre Monteagudo, Lucía Chacón Aranda, Jaime Marco Algarra
{"title":"Normal hearing and verbal discrimination in real sounds environments.","authors":"Adriana Lodeiro Colatosti, Ignacio Pla Gil, Antonio Morant Ventura, Emilia Latorre Monteagudo, Lucía Chacón Aranda, Jaime Marco Algarra","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Human beings are constantly exposed to complex acoustic environments every day, which even pose challenges for individuals with normal hearing. Speech perception relies not only on fixed elements within the acoustic wave but is also influenced by various factors. These factors include speech intensity, environmental noise, the presence of other speakers, individual specific characteristics, spatial separatios of sound sources, ambient reverberation, and audiovisual cues. The objective of this study is twofold: to determine the auditory capacity of normal hearing individuals to discriminate spoken words in real-life acoustic conditions and perform a phonetic analysis of misunderstood spoken words.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a descriptive observational cross-sectional study involving 20 normal hearing individuals. Verbal audiometry was conducted in an open-field environment, with sounds masked by simulated real-word acoustic environment at various sound intensity levels. To enhance sound emission, 2D visual images related to the sounds were displayed on a television. We analyzed the percentage of correct answers and performed a phonetic analysis of misunderstood Spanish bisyllabic words in each environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 women (70%) and 6 men (30%), with an average age of 26 ± 5,4 years and a mean airway hearing threshold in the right ear of 10,56 ± 3,52 dB SPL and in the left ear of 10,12 ± 2,49 dB SPL. The percentage of verbal discrimination in the \"Ocean\" sound environment was 97,2 ± 5,04%, \"Restaurant\" was 94 ± 4,58%, and \"Traffic\" was 86,2 ± 9,94% (p = 0,000). Regarding the phonetic analysis, the allophones that exhibited statistically significant differences were as follows: [o] (p = 0,002) within the group of vocalic phonemes, [n] (p = 0,000) of voiced nasal consonants, [r] (p = 0,0016) of voiced fricatives, [b] (p = 0,000) and [g] (p = 0,045) of voiced stops.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dynamic properties of the acoustic environment can impact the ability of a normal hearing individual to extract information from a voice signal. Our study demonstrates that this ability decreases when the voice signal is masked by one or more simultaneous interfering voices, as observed in a \"Restaurant\" environment, and when it is masked by a continuous and intense noise environment such as \"Traffic\". Regarding the phonetic analysis, when the sound environment was composed of continuous-low frequency noise, we found that nasal consonants were particularly challenging to identify. Furthermore in situations with distracting verbal signals, vowels and vibrating consonants exhibited the worst intelligibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2024.05.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Human beings are constantly exposed to complex acoustic environments every day, which even pose challenges for individuals with normal hearing. Speech perception relies not only on fixed elements within the acoustic wave but is also influenced by various factors. These factors include speech intensity, environmental noise, the presence of other speakers, individual specific characteristics, spatial separatios of sound sources, ambient reverberation, and audiovisual cues. The objective of this study is twofold: to determine the auditory capacity of normal hearing individuals to discriminate spoken words in real-life acoustic conditions and perform a phonetic analysis of misunderstood spoken words.

Materials and methods: This is a descriptive observational cross-sectional study involving 20 normal hearing individuals. Verbal audiometry was conducted in an open-field environment, with sounds masked by simulated real-word acoustic environment at various sound intensity levels. To enhance sound emission, 2D visual images related to the sounds were displayed on a television. We analyzed the percentage of correct answers and performed a phonetic analysis of misunderstood Spanish bisyllabic words in each environment.

Results: 14 women (70%) and 6 men (30%), with an average age of 26 ± 5,4 years and a mean airway hearing threshold in the right ear of 10,56 ± 3,52 dB SPL and in the left ear of 10,12 ± 2,49 dB SPL. The percentage of verbal discrimination in the "Ocean" sound environment was 97,2 ± 5,04%, "Restaurant" was 94 ± 4,58%, and "Traffic" was 86,2 ± 9,94% (p = 0,000). Regarding the phonetic analysis, the allophones that exhibited statistically significant differences were as follows: [o] (p = 0,002) within the group of vocalic phonemes, [n] (p = 0,000) of voiced nasal consonants, [r] (p = 0,0016) of voiced fricatives, [b] (p = 0,000) and [g] (p = 0,045) of voiced stops.

Conclusion: The dynamic properties of the acoustic environment can impact the ability of a normal hearing individual to extract information from a voice signal. Our study demonstrates that this ability decreases when the voice signal is masked by one or more simultaneous interfering voices, as observed in a "Restaurant" environment, and when it is masked by a continuous and intense noise environment such as "Traffic". Regarding the phonetic analysis, when the sound environment was composed of continuous-low frequency noise, we found that nasal consonants were particularly challenging to identify. Furthermore in situations with distracting verbal signals, vowels and vibrating consonants exhibited the worst intelligibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在真实声音环境中的正常听力和语言辨别能力。
引言人类每天都要面对复杂的声学环境,这甚至给听力正常的人带来了挑战。语音感知不仅依赖于声波中的固定要素,还受到各种因素的影响。这些因素包括语音强度、环境噪声、其他扬声器的存在、个人特征、声源的空间隔离、环境混响和视听线索。本研究的目的有两个:一是确定听力正常的人在真实的声学条件下辨别口语单词的听觉能力,二是对被误解的口语单词进行语音分析:这是一项描述性观察横断面研究,涉及 20 名听力正常的人。口语测听是在开阔地环境中进行的,声音被不同声强水平的模拟实词声学环境所掩盖。为了增强声音发射,电视上显示了与声音相关的二维视觉图像。我们分析了正确答案的百分比,并对每个环境中被误解的西班牙语双音节词进行了语音分析:14 名女性(70%)和 6 名男性(30%),平均年龄为 26 ± 5.4 岁,右耳平均气道听阈为 10.56 ± 3.52 dB SPL,左耳平均气道听阈为 10.12 ± 2.49 dB SPL。在 "海洋 "声环境中的语言辨别率为 97.2 ± 5.04%,"餐厅 "为 94 ± 4.58%,"交通 "为 86.2 ± 9.94%(p = 0.000)。在语音分析方面,表现出显著统计学差异的异音如下:发声音素组中的[o](p = 0,002)、发声鼻辅音中的[n](p = 0,000)、发声摩擦音中的[r](p = 0,0016)、发声停止音中的[b](p = 0,000)和[g](p = 0,045):声学环境的动态特性会影响正常听力个体从语音信号中提取信息的能力。我们的研究表明,当声音信号被一个或多个同时出现的干扰声音所掩盖时(如在 "餐厅 "环境中观察到的情况),以及当声音信号被连续而强烈的噪声环境(如 "交通 "环境)所掩盖时,这种能力就会下降。在语音分析方面,当声音环境由连续的低频噪音组成时,我们发现鼻辅音的识别尤其具有挑战性。此外,在有干扰语言信号的情况下,元音和振动辅音的可懂度最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fenestrated internal yugular vein crossed by spinal nerve. Transethmoidal meningoencephalocele: Endoscopic and radiological morphology. Retrolabyrinthine approach to the lateral skull base: The value of preoperative temporal bone CT analysis Executive Summary of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management The current situation of tutoring in specialised training in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery in Spain. Where are we? Where do we want to go?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1