Radical cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal sarcomatosis: Results from a reference center and considerations based on current evidence

{"title":"Radical cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal sarcomatosis: Results from a reference center and considerations based on current evidence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with </span>hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>23 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6−68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3−36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III–IV) of 13%, with no </span>postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64% and 34%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential </span>prognostic factor for survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173507724001509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.

Methods

Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results

23 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6−68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3−36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III–IV) of 13%, with no postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64% and 34%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗腹膜肉瘤病的根治性细胞切除手术和腹腔内热化疗:参考中心的研究结果和基于现有证据的考虑。
简介腹膜肉瘤病是一种罕见疾病,有多种组织学起源,总体预后较差。根治性细胞切除手术(CRS)与热疗腹腔化疗(HIPEC)的选择存在争议。本文基于现有证据,分析并讨论了一个在这些手术方面经验丰富的手术团队的结果:研究对象为2016年至2022年在国家肉瘤和腹膜肿瘤外科参考中心接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的腹膜肉瘤病患者,符合既定的纳入/排除标准。临床表现以复发性/持续性为主(78.3%)。内脏来源(包括GIST和非GIST腹膜)的患者占47.8%,而子宫来源和腹膜后来源的患者分别占43.5%和8.7%。PCI中位数为17(3-36),CC0细胞减少率为87%。术后发病率(Dindo Clavien III-IV)为 13%,系列手术中无术后死亡病例。5年的总生存率和无病生存率分别为64%和34%。组织学分级是对生存率影响最大的预后因素:该系列研究的结果表明,腹膜肿瘤根治术对腹膜肉瘤病患者的益处在于发病率低,只要在大容量中心、经验丰富的外科医生和多学科专家团队的充分筛选下进行腹膜肿瘤根治术即可。不过,腹腔内癌根治术的作用仍有待证明,有待今后的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of sarcopenic obesity on surgical complications and oncologic outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Robotic Approach for Remnant Cholelithiasis and CBD Exploration for Gallstones Removal. Indocyanine green in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: utility and correlation with a preoperative risk score. Need for a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol for patients with preoperative biliary drainage undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Embolize, supercharge, resect: Embolization to enhance hepatic vascularization prior to en-bloc pancreas and arterial resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1