Feasibility of the Anchor-Free Deep Learning Method in Coronary Stenosis Automatic Detection

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1155/2024/2606789
Hanlin Yue, Wei Yu, Ji Dong, Yunfei Lai, You Wu, Haixia Zhao, Yiwei Song, Li Zhao, Hui Wang, Jing Zhang, Xinping Xu, Binwei Yao, Jianghao Zhao, Kexian Wang, Yue Sun, Haoyu Wang, Ruiyun Peng
{"title":"Feasibility of the Anchor-Free Deep Learning Method in Coronary Stenosis Automatic Detection","authors":"Hanlin Yue,&nbsp;Wei Yu,&nbsp;Ji Dong,&nbsp;Yunfei Lai,&nbsp;You Wu,&nbsp;Haixia Zhao,&nbsp;Yiwei Song,&nbsp;Li Zhao,&nbsp;Hui Wang,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Xinping Xu,&nbsp;Binwei Yao,&nbsp;Jianghao Zhao,&nbsp;Kexian Wang,&nbsp;Yue Sun,&nbsp;Haoyu Wang,&nbsp;Ruiyun Peng","doi":"10.1155/2024/2606789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a type of cardiovascular disease which is one of the leading causes of death around the world. The presence of coronary stenosis is considered a pivotal indicator in the diagnosis of various CADs. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the feasibility of an anchor-free deep learning (DL) method, fully convolutional one-stage object detection (FCOS), in coronary artery stenosis automatic detection. <i>Methods</i>. First, 2786 invasive coronary angiography (ICA) images from 130 patients were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing datasets using the 10-fold cross-validation approach. Then, FCOS was compared with other three widely used anchor-based DL models: single shot multibox detector (SSD), faster region-based convolutional network (Faster R-CNN), and you only look once (YOLOv3), in terms of precision, recall, <i>F</i>1 score, average precision (AP), and average recall (AR). Finally, the performances of different models in the detection of stenosis were compared in either single or multiple lesion scenarios using statistical tests. <i>Results</i>. FCOS achieved significantly superior precision (96.14% ± 0.53%), recall (94.36% ± 0.79%), <i>F</i>1 score (95.22% ± 0.56%), AP<sub>0.50</sub> (93.36% ± 0.93%), AR<sub>0.50:0.95</sub> (64.73% ± 1.46%), AP<sub>small</sub> (55.04 ± 0.96%), AP<sub>medium</sub> (59.97 ± 1.13%), and AP<sub>large</sub> (68.09 ± 5.18%) compared to Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3. Moreover, FCOS demonstrated significantly higher AR<sub>0.50:0.95</sub> and AP<sub>small</sub> compared to SSD. Regardless of the presence of single or multiple coronary stenoses in ICA images, FCOS also outperformed Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3. Furthermore, it showed significantly higher AR<sub>0.50:0.95</sub> compared to SSD when in the multiple stenosis scenario. <i>Conclusions</i>. It is feasible to use the anchor-free DL model FCOS in detecting coronary stenosis based on ICA images.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2606789","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2606789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a type of cardiovascular disease which is one of the leading causes of death around the world. The presence of coronary stenosis is considered a pivotal indicator in the diagnosis of various CADs. The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the feasibility of an anchor-free deep learning (DL) method, fully convolutional one-stage object detection (FCOS), in coronary artery stenosis automatic detection. Methods. First, 2786 invasive coronary angiography (ICA) images from 130 patients were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing datasets using the 10-fold cross-validation approach. Then, FCOS was compared with other three widely used anchor-based DL models: single shot multibox detector (SSD), faster region-based convolutional network (Faster R-CNN), and you only look once (YOLOv3), in terms of precision, recall, F1 score, average precision (AP), and average recall (AR). Finally, the performances of different models in the detection of stenosis were compared in either single or multiple lesion scenarios using statistical tests. Results. FCOS achieved significantly superior precision (96.14% ± 0.53%), recall (94.36% ± 0.79%), F1 score (95.22% ± 0.56%), AP0.50 (93.36% ± 0.93%), AR0.50:0.95 (64.73% ± 1.46%), APsmall (55.04 ± 0.96%), APmedium (59.97 ± 1.13%), and APlarge (68.09 ± 5.18%) compared to Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3. Moreover, FCOS demonstrated significantly higher AR0.50:0.95 and APsmall compared to SSD. Regardless of the presence of single or multiple coronary stenoses in ICA images, FCOS also outperformed Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3. Furthermore, it showed significantly higher AR0.50:0.95 compared to SSD when in the multiple stenosis scenario. Conclusions. It is feasible to use the anchor-free DL model FCOS in detecting coronary stenosis based on ICA images.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无锚深度学习方法在冠状动脉狭窄自动检测中的可行性
背景。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是心血管疾病的一种,是导致全球死亡的主要原因之一。冠状动脉狭窄的存在被认为是诊断各种 CAD 的关键指标。本文的主要目的是研究无锚深度学习(DL)方法--全卷积单级对象检测(FCOS)--在冠状动脉狭窄自动检测中的可行性。研究方法首先,使用 10 倍交叉验证法将来自 130 名患者的 2786 张有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)图像随机分为训练、验证和测试数据集。然后,从精确度、召回率、F1 得分、平均精确度(AP)和平均召回率(AR)等方面,将 FCOS 与其他三种广泛使用的基于锚的 DL 模型(单枪多箱检测器(SSD)、更快的基于区域的卷积网络(Faster R-CNN)和只看一次(YOLOv3))进行了比较。最后,通过统计检验比较了不同模型在单病变或多病变情况下检测血管狭窄的性能。结果显示FCOS 的精确度(96.14% ± 0.53%)、召回率(94.36% ± 0.79%)、F1 分数(95.22% ± 0.56%)、AP0.50(93.36% ± 0.93%)、AR0.50:0.95(64.73% ± 1.46%)、APsmall(55.04 ± 0.96%)、APmedium(59.97 ± 1.13%)和 APlarge(68.09 ± 5.18%)。此外,与 SSD 相比,FCOS 的 AR0.50:0.95 和 APsmall 明显更高。无论在 ICA 图像中是否存在单个或多个冠状动脉狭窄,FCOS 的表现都优于 Faster R-CNN 和 YOLOv3。此外,在多处狭窄的情况下,FCOS 的 AR0.50:0.95 明显高于 SSD。结论基于 ICA 图像使用无锚 DL 模型 FCOS 检测冠状动脉狭窄是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1