Donor to recipient age matching in lung transplantation: A European experience

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.06.008
{"title":"Donor to recipient age matching in lung transplantation: A European experience","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The age profile of organ donors and patients on lung transplantation (LT) waiting lists have changed over time. In Europe, the donor population has aged much more rapidly than the recipient population, making allocation decisions on lungs from older donors common. In this study we assessed the impact of donor and recipient age discrepancy on LT outcomes in the UK and France.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of all adult single or bilateral LT in France and the UK between 2010 and 2021. Recipients were stratified into 3 age author groups: young (≤30 years), middle-aged (30–60) and older (≥60). Their donors were also stratified into 2 groups &lt;60, ≥60. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) rates and recipient survival was compared between matched and mismatched donor and recipient age groups. Propensity matching was employed to minimize covariate imbalances and to improve the internal validity of our results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study cohort was 4,696 lung transplant recipients (LTRs). In young and older LTRs, there was no significant difference in 1 and 5-year post-transplant survival dependent on the age category of the donor. Young LTRs who received older donor grafts had a higher risk of severe grade 3 PGD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings show that clinically usable organs from older donors can be utilized safely in LT, even for younger recipients. Further research is needed to assess if the higher rate of PGD3 associated with use of older donors has an effect on long-term outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249824017005/pdfft?md5=4da38d3d3308101f246dc79f2e9e04f1&pid=1-s2.0-S1053249824017005-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249824017005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The age profile of organ donors and patients on lung transplantation (LT) waiting lists have changed over time. In Europe, the donor population has aged much more rapidly than the recipient population, making allocation decisions on lungs from older donors common. In this study we assessed the impact of donor and recipient age discrepancy on LT outcomes in the UK and France.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all adult single or bilateral LT in France and the UK between 2010 and 2021. Recipients were stratified into 3 age author groups: young (≤30 years), middle-aged (30–60) and older (≥60). Their donors were also stratified into 2 groups <60, ≥60. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) rates and recipient survival was compared between matched and mismatched donor and recipient age groups. Propensity matching was employed to minimize covariate imbalances and to improve the internal validity of our results.

Results

Our study cohort was 4,696 lung transplant recipients (LTRs). In young and older LTRs, there was no significant difference in 1 and 5-year post-transplant survival dependent on the age category of the donor. Young LTRs who received older donor grafts had a higher risk of severe grade 3 PGD.

Conclusion

Our findings show that clinically usable organs from older donors can be utilized safely in LT, even for younger recipients. Further research is needed to assess if the higher rate of PGD3 associated with use of older donors has an effect on long-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺移植中供体与受体年龄匹配:欧洲的经验。
背景:随着时间的推移,器官捐献者和肺移植(LT)候选名单上患者的年龄分布发生了变化。在欧洲,器官捐献者的年龄增长速度远高于器官接受者的年龄增长速度,这使得肺移植的分配决定往往取决于年龄较大的器官捐献者。在这项研究中,我们评估了英国和法国的供体和受体年龄差异对肺移植结果的影响:方法:对2010年至2021年间法国和英国所有成人单侧或双侧LT进行回顾性分析。受者被分为3个年龄组:年轻组(≤30岁)、中年组(30至60岁)和老年组(≥60岁)。结果:我们的研究队列中有 4,696 名肺移植受者。在年轻和年长的肺移植受者中,移植后 1 年和 5 年的存活率与供体的年龄类别没有显著差异。接受年龄较大供体移植物的年轻肺移植受者发生严重3级PGD的风险较高:我们的研究结果表明,临床上可用的老年捐献者器官可以安全地用于LT,即使是年轻的受者。还需要进一步研究,以评估使用年龄较大的供体是否会导致较高的 PGD3 发生率,从而对长期预后产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
A new day has come: Sotatercept for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. A Perspective on the Added Value of Red Blood Cells during Cardiac Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion. Loss of Nr4a1 ameliorates endothelial cell injury and vascular leakage in lung transplantation from circulatory-death donor. The Outcome of Restrictive Cardiac Allograft Physiology in Severe Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy. Defining direct and indirect right ventricular unloading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1