Preconceived Impressions Regarding Holmium:YAG Laser Safety in the Urology Operating Theatre.

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S457617
Mitchell Barns, Daniel Magee, Thomas England
{"title":"Preconceived Impressions Regarding Holmium:YAG Laser Safety in the Urology Operating Theatre.","authors":"Mitchell Barns, Daniel Magee, Thomas England","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S457617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its introduction over two decades ago, the surgical laser has served in the lithotripsy of urinary calculi, resection of bladder tumours, bladder neck incisions, and prostate enucleation. Concerns regarding the safe use of holmium lasers have resulted in potentially excessive and overly precautious theatre regulations. We aimed to evaluate the preconceived impressions and practice patterns at a single site surrounding laser use in endourology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a three-part online questionnaire that could be accessed using a smart device or computer. This survey was distributed to all theatre staff involved in laser surgery at our single site, including surgical, nursing, and anaesthetic staff of varying seniority. It asked questions regarding holmium laser safety, provided an up-to-date summary of published literature surrounding the safe use of lasers, and finally gave participants further option to alter the answers to several previously encountered questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 theatre staff completed the survey, including 17 theatre nurses (31.5%), 10 urology consultants (18.5%), 8 urology registrars (14.8%), 7 anaesthetic registrars (13%), 4 anaesthetic consultants (7.4%). About 51.9% of participants believed that current laser safety protocols were adequate, with 38.9% finding them excessive. After reading recently published information on laser safety, 22.2% thought current laser safety measures were adequate (57% decrease) and 77.8% found them to be excessive (100% increase). About 74.1% of participants found that laser safety goggles impair their vision and that 79.6% would choose not to wear them if they were optional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strict laser safety guidelines reflect an overestimated risk associated with using holmium laser in operating theatres. Laser safety regulations should be re-evaluated to align with current research and potential hazards inherent to the device. In doing so, a more effective distribution of staff could enable greater access to laser surgery, thereby reducing patient morbidity and hospital wait times.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S457617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since its introduction over two decades ago, the surgical laser has served in the lithotripsy of urinary calculi, resection of bladder tumours, bladder neck incisions, and prostate enucleation. Concerns regarding the safe use of holmium lasers have resulted in potentially excessive and overly precautious theatre regulations. We aimed to evaluate the preconceived impressions and practice patterns at a single site surrounding laser use in endourology.

Methods: We designed a three-part online questionnaire that could be accessed using a smart device or computer. This survey was distributed to all theatre staff involved in laser surgery at our single site, including surgical, nursing, and anaesthetic staff of varying seniority. It asked questions regarding holmium laser safety, provided an up-to-date summary of published literature surrounding the safe use of lasers, and finally gave participants further option to alter the answers to several previously encountered questions.

Results: A total of 54 theatre staff completed the survey, including 17 theatre nurses (31.5%), 10 urology consultants (18.5%), 8 urology registrars (14.8%), 7 anaesthetic registrars (13%), 4 anaesthetic consultants (7.4%). About 51.9% of participants believed that current laser safety protocols were adequate, with 38.9% finding them excessive. After reading recently published information on laser safety, 22.2% thought current laser safety measures were adequate (57% decrease) and 77.8% found them to be excessive (100% increase). About 74.1% of participants found that laser safety goggles impair their vision and that 79.6% would choose not to wear them if they were optional.

Conclusion: Strict laser safety guidelines reflect an overestimated risk associated with using holmium laser in operating theatres. Laser safety regulations should be re-evaluated to align with current research and potential hazards inherent to the device. In doing so, a more effective distribution of staff could enable greater access to laser surgery, thereby reducing patient morbidity and hospital wait times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿外科手术室中有关钬:YAG 激光安全性的先入为主的印象。
背景:手术激光自二十多年前问世以来,一直用于泌尿系结石碎石、膀胱肿瘤切除、膀胱颈部切口和前列腺去核手术。对钬激光安全使用的担忧导致了可能过度和过于谨慎的手术室规定。我们的目的是评估一个地点围绕激光在腔内泌尿学中的应用所产生的先入为主的印象和实践模式:我们设计了一份由三部分组成的在线问卷,可使用智能设备或电脑进行访问。这份调查问卷分发给了我们这所医院所有参与激光手术的医务人员,包括不同资历的外科、护理和麻醉科人员。调查询问了有关钬激光安全的问题,提供了有关激光安全使用的最新文献摘要,最后还为参与者提供了进一步的选项,以更改之前遇到的几个问题的答案:共有 54 名手术室工作人员完成了调查,其中包括 17 名手术室护士(31.5%)、10 名泌尿科顾问(18.5%)、8 名泌尿科注册医师(14.8%)、7 名麻醉科注册医师(13%)和 4 名麻醉科顾问(7.4%)。约51.9%的参与者认为目前的激光安全规程已经足够,38.9%的参与者认为这些规程过于严格。在阅读了最近出版的有关激光安全的资料后,22.2%的人认为目前的激光安全措施是充分的(减少了57%),77.8%的人认为是过度的(增加了100%)。约 74.1%的参与者认为激光安全护目镜会损害他们的视力,如果可以选择佩戴,79.6%的人会选择不佩戴:结论:严格的激光安全指南反映出在手术室使用钬激光的风险被高估了。应重新评估激光安全规定,使其与当前的研究和设备固有的潜在危害保持一致。这样做可以更有效地分配人员,让更多人接受激光手术,从而降低患者发病率,缩短住院等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Fucoidan Ameliorates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Rats. Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS): A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Strategies and Management Approaches. An Evaluation of the Postvoid Residual Urine Volume in Acute Stroke Patients. General Obesity and Prostate Cancer in Relation to Abdominal Obesity and Ethnic Groups: A US Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Incidence and Recurrence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1