Queensland Trauma Education (QTE): an innovative simulation program that addresses the needs and barriers of interprofessional trauma care education across a complex landscape.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.22605/RRH8851
Kirsty McLeod, Laura Owens, Frances Williamson, Belinda Faulkner, Mia McLanders
{"title":"Queensland Trauma Education (QTE): an innovative simulation program that addresses the needs and barriers of interprofessional trauma care education across a complex landscape.","authors":"Kirsty McLeod, Laura Owens, Frances Williamson, Belinda Faulkner, Mia McLanders","doi":"10.22605/RRH8851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective trauma care requires the rapid management of injuries. Rural and remote areas face inequity in trauma care due to time, distance and resource constraints, and experience higher morbidity and mortality rates than urban settings. A training needs analysis (TNA) conducted with stakeholders across Queensland, Australia, revealed a lack of contextual, accessible and interprofessional trauma education for clinicians. The Clinical Skills Development Service and Jamieson Trauma Institute developed the Queensland Trauma Education (QTE) program to address these concerns. QTE comprises a face-to-face training course and open access to online training resources created and reviewed by trauma experts. QTE also supports local training through a statewide simulation network and free access to simulation training equipment. The aim of this article is to review the QTE program and assess the benefits to clinicians in both the delivery of education and the provision of trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the QTE program, a desktop review was conducted. This included analyses of website data, course and website content, and facilitator, stakeholder, participant and user feedback. The data were evaluated using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework, and the program's alignment with the original TNA outcomes was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that QTE aligns with the identified training needs. Specifically, QTE provides trauma education that is relevant, sustainable, employs best practice, is locally delivered, provides continuous support, is multidisciplinary, multi-platformed, physically accessible and accredited by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. The review also highlights how QTE has effectively been reaching its target population, improves knowledge and skills, has become widely adopted, and been implemented and maintained with relative success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The innovative QTE program addresses the previous deficits in trauma education and meets the needs identified in the TNA. The review also reveals further opportunities for continuous improvement and program sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 2","pages":"8851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective trauma care requires the rapid management of injuries. Rural and remote areas face inequity in trauma care due to time, distance and resource constraints, and experience higher morbidity and mortality rates than urban settings. A training needs analysis (TNA) conducted with stakeholders across Queensland, Australia, revealed a lack of contextual, accessible and interprofessional trauma education for clinicians. The Clinical Skills Development Service and Jamieson Trauma Institute developed the Queensland Trauma Education (QTE) program to address these concerns. QTE comprises a face-to-face training course and open access to online training resources created and reviewed by trauma experts. QTE also supports local training through a statewide simulation network and free access to simulation training equipment. The aim of this article is to review the QTE program and assess the benefits to clinicians in both the delivery of education and the provision of trauma care.

Methods: To evaluate the QTE program, a desktop review was conducted. This included analyses of website data, course and website content, and facilitator, stakeholder, participant and user feedback. The data were evaluated using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework, and the program's alignment with the original TNA outcomes was assessed.

Results: The results showed that QTE aligns with the identified training needs. Specifically, QTE provides trauma education that is relevant, sustainable, employs best practice, is locally delivered, provides continuous support, is multidisciplinary, multi-platformed, physically accessible and accredited by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. The review also highlights how QTE has effectively been reaching its target population, improves knowledge and skills, has become widely adopted, and been implemented and maintained with relative success.

Conclusion: The innovative QTE program addresses the previous deficits in trauma education and meets the needs identified in the TNA. The review also reveals further opportunities for continuous improvement and program sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昆士兰创伤教育(Queensland Trauma Education,QTE):一项创新的模拟计划,在复杂的环境中解决跨专业创伤护理教育的需求和障碍。
介绍:有效的创伤救治需要快速处理创伤。由于时间、距离和资源的限制,农村和偏远地区在创伤救护方面面临着不公平,其发病率和死亡率均高于城市地区。与澳大利亚昆士兰州的利益相关者一起进行的培训需求分析(TNA)显示,临床医生缺乏针对具体情况的、方便的跨专业创伤教育。为解决这些问题,临床技能发展服务部和杰米森创伤研究所共同开发了昆士兰创伤教育 (QTE) 计划。QTE 包括面对面培训课程和开放式在线培训资源,这些资源由创伤专家创建并审核。QTE 还通过全州范围的模拟网络和免费使用的模拟训练设备为当地培训提供支持。本文旨在对 QTE 计划进行回顾,并评估临床医生在接受教育和提供创伤护理方面的收益:为了评估 QTE 计划,我们进行了桌面审查。方法: 为评估 QTE 计划,我们进行了桌面审查,包括分析网站数据、课程和网站内容,以及主持人、利益相关者、参与者和用户的反馈意见。使用 RE-AIM(覆盖面、有效性、采用、实施和维护)框架对数据进行了评估,并对该计划与最初的 TNA 成果的一致性进行了评估:结果表明,QTE 符合已确定的培训需求。具体而言,QTE 所提供的创伤教育具有相关性、可持续性、采用最佳实践、在当地开展、提供持续支持、多学科、多平台、实际可及,并获得了澳大利亚急诊医学院的认证。审查还强调了 QTE 如何有效地覆盖目标人群、提高知识和技能、被广泛采用,以及如何在实施和维护方面取得相对成功:结论:创新的 QTE 计划解决了以往创伤教育中的不足,并满足了 TNA 中确定的需求。审查还揭示了持续改进和计划可持续性的更多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
'Imagine if we had an actual service ...': a qualitative exploration of abortion access challenges in Australian rural primary care. The Murtupuni Statement on rural generalist professional practice in Australia. Therapeutic resources used by traditional communities of the Brazilian Amazon: a scoping review. First Nations Peoples' perspectives on telehealth physiotherapy: a qualitative study focused on the therapeutic relationship. Social determinants and socioeconomic inequalities in adherence to antenatal iron-folic acid supplementation in urban and rural Indonesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1