Association between butyrate-producing gut bacteria and the risk of infectious disease hospitalisation: results from two observational, population-based microbiome studies

IF 20.9 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Microbe Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00079-X
{"title":"Association between butyrate-producing gut bacteria and the risk of infectious disease hospitalisation: results from two observational, population-based microbiome studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00079-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Microbiota alterations are common in patients hospitalised for severe infections, and preclinical models have shown that anaerobic butyrate-producing gut bacteria protect against systemic infections. However, the relationship between microbiota disruptions and increased susceptibility to severe infections in humans remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between gut microbiota and the risk of future infection-related hospitalisation in two large population-based cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this observational microbiome study, gut microbiota were characterised using 16S rRNA gene sequencing in independent population-based cohorts from the Netherlands (HELIUS study; derivation cohort) and Finland (FINRISK 2002 study; validation cohort). HELIUS was conducted in Amsterdam, Netherlands, and included adults (aged 18–70 years at inclusion) who were randomly sampled from the municipality register of Amsterdam. FINRISK 2002 was conducted in six regions in Finland and is a population survey that included a random sample of adults (aged 25–74 years). In both cohorts, participants completed questionnaires, underwent a physical examination, and provided a faecal sample at inclusion (Jan 3, 2013, to Nov 27, 2015, for HELIUS participants and Jan 21 to April 19, 2002, for FINRISK participants. For inclusion in our study, a faecal sample needed to be provided and successfully sequenced, and national registry data needed to be available. Primary predictor variables were microbiota composition, diversity, and relative abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria. Our primary outcome was hospitalisation or mortality due to any infectious disease during 5–7-year follow-up after faecal sample collection, based on national registry data. We examined associations between microbiota and infection risk using microbial ecology and Cox proportional hazards.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We profiled gut microbiota from 10 699 participants (4248 [39·7%] from the derivation cohort and 6451 [60·3%] from the validation cohort). 602 (5·6%) participants (152 [3·6%] from the derivation cohort; 450 [7·0%] from the validation cohort) were hospitalised or died due to infections during follow-up. Gut microbiota composition of these participants differed from those without hospitalisation for infections (derivation p=0·041; validation p=0·0002). Specifically, higher relative abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalisation for infections (derivation cohort cause-specific hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·60–0·94] per 10% increase in butyrate producers, p=0·013; validation cohort 0·86 [0·77–0·96] per 10% increase, p=0·0077). These associations remained unchanged following adjustment for demographics, lifestyle, antibiotic exposure, and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Gut microbiota composition, specifically colonisation with butyrate-producing bacteria, was associated with protection against hospitalisation for infectious diseases in the general population across two independent European cohorts. Further studies should investigate whether modulation of the microbiome can reduce the risk of severe infections.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Amsterdam UMC, Porticus, National Institutes of Health, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), and Leducq Foundation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266652472400079X/pdfft?md5=fd2df1ffc0f7c117acb299cdf1ceffdd&pid=1-s2.0-S266652472400079X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266652472400079X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Microbiota alterations are common in patients hospitalised for severe infections, and preclinical models have shown that anaerobic butyrate-producing gut bacteria protect against systemic infections. However, the relationship between microbiota disruptions and increased susceptibility to severe infections in humans remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between gut microbiota and the risk of future infection-related hospitalisation in two large population-based cohorts.

Methods

In this observational microbiome study, gut microbiota were characterised using 16S rRNA gene sequencing in independent population-based cohorts from the Netherlands (HELIUS study; derivation cohort) and Finland (FINRISK 2002 study; validation cohort). HELIUS was conducted in Amsterdam, Netherlands, and included adults (aged 18–70 years at inclusion) who were randomly sampled from the municipality register of Amsterdam. FINRISK 2002 was conducted in six regions in Finland and is a population survey that included a random sample of adults (aged 25–74 years). In both cohorts, participants completed questionnaires, underwent a physical examination, and provided a faecal sample at inclusion (Jan 3, 2013, to Nov 27, 2015, for HELIUS participants and Jan 21 to April 19, 2002, for FINRISK participants. For inclusion in our study, a faecal sample needed to be provided and successfully sequenced, and national registry data needed to be available. Primary predictor variables were microbiota composition, diversity, and relative abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria. Our primary outcome was hospitalisation or mortality due to any infectious disease during 5–7-year follow-up after faecal sample collection, based on national registry data. We examined associations between microbiota and infection risk using microbial ecology and Cox proportional hazards.

Findings

We profiled gut microbiota from 10 699 participants (4248 [39·7%] from the derivation cohort and 6451 [60·3%] from the validation cohort). 602 (5·6%) participants (152 [3·6%] from the derivation cohort; 450 [7·0%] from the validation cohort) were hospitalised or died due to infections during follow-up. Gut microbiota composition of these participants differed from those without hospitalisation for infections (derivation p=0·041; validation p=0·0002). Specifically, higher relative abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalisation for infections (derivation cohort cause-specific hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·60–0·94] per 10% increase in butyrate producers, p=0·013; validation cohort 0·86 [0·77–0·96] per 10% increase, p=0·0077). These associations remained unchanged following adjustment for demographics, lifestyle, antibiotic exposure, and comorbidities.

Interpretation

Gut microbiota composition, specifically colonisation with butyrate-producing bacteria, was associated with protection against hospitalisation for infectious diseases in the general population across two independent European cohorts. Further studies should investigate whether modulation of the microbiome can reduce the risk of severe infections.

Funding

Amsterdam UMC, Porticus, National Institutes of Health, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), and Leducq Foundation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产生丁酸盐的肠道细菌与传染病住院风险之间的关系:两项基于人群的观察性微生物组研究的结果。
背景:微生物群改变在因严重感染而住院的患者中很常见,临床前模型显示,厌氧丁酸肠道细菌可防止全身感染。然而,微生物群紊乱与人类严重感染易感性增加之间的关系仍不清楚。我们在两个大型人群队列中调查了肠道微生物群与未来感染相关住院风险之间的关系:在这项观察性微生物组研究中,我们对荷兰(HELIUS 研究;衍生队列)和芬兰(FINRISK 2002 研究;验证队列)的独立人群队列中的肠道微生物群进行了 16S rRNA 基因测序。HELIUS 研究在荷兰阿姆斯特丹进行,研究对象包括从阿姆斯特丹市政登记册中随机抽样的成年人(纳入时年龄为 18-70 岁)。FINRISK 2002 在芬兰的六个地区进行,是一项人口调查,包括随机抽样的成年人(25-74 岁)。在两个队列中,参与者都填写了调查问卷,接受了体格检查,并在纳入研究时提供了粪便样本(HELIUS参与者为2013年1月3日至2015年11月27日,FINRISK参与者为2002年1月21日至4月19日)。要纳入我们的研究,必须提供粪便样本并成功测序,还必须提供国家登记数据。主要预测变量是微生物群的组成、多样性以及丁酸菌的相对丰度。根据国家登记数据,我们的主要结果是粪便样本采集后 5-7 年随访期间因任何传染病住院或死亡。我们使用微生物生态学和 Cox 比例危险度法研究了微生物群与感染风险之间的关系:我们对 10 699 名参与者(4 248 人[39-7%]来自衍生队列,6451 人[60-3%]来自验证队列)的肠道微生物群进行了分析。602名(5-6%)参与者(152名[3-6%]来自衍生队列;450名[7-0%]来自验证队列)在随访期间因感染住院或死亡。这些参与者的肠道微生物群组成与未因感染住院的参与者有所不同(衍生组群 p=0-041;验证组群 p=0-0002)。具体来说,产生丁酸盐的细菌相对丰度越高,因感染住院的风险越低(丁酸盐产生者每增加 10%,衍生队列特异性病因危险比为 0-75 [95% CI 0-60-0-94],p=0-013;验证队列每增加 10%,危险比为 0-86 [0-77-0-96],p=0-0077)。在对人口统计学、生活方式、抗生素暴露和合并症进行调整后,这些相关性保持不变:在两个独立的欧洲队列中,肠道微生物群的组成,特别是丁酸菌的定植,与普通人群预防感染性疾病住院有关。进一步的研究应探讨调节微生物群是否能降低严重感染的风险:阿姆斯特丹UMC、Porticus、美国国立卫生研究院、荷兰卫生研究与发展组织(ZonMw)和Leducq基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
期刊最新文献
State of the art and the future of microbiome-based biomarkers: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus. First self-test for hepatitis C virus. Human cases of avian influenza A(H5) in the USA. Fatal meningoencephalitis associated with Ebola virus persistence in two survivors of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a case report study. Whole-genome sequencing unveils the outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in mainland China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1