Antimicrobial resistance patterns among critical priority pathogens in an intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a descriptive analysis comparing pre- and COVID-19 eras.

Mai M Zafer, Dina M Bassiouny, Soumya Ghosh, Charné Bornman, Amira F A Hussein
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance patterns among critical priority pathogens in an intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a descriptive analysis comparing pre- and COVID-19 eras.","authors":"Mai M Zafer, Dina M Bassiouny, Soumya Ghosh, Charné Bornman, Amira F A Hussein","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The intensified global challenge of antimicrobial resistance, set against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, is a cause for major concern. Within healthcare settings, intensive care units are recognized as focal points for Gram-negative infections. The study pursued to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of critical priority pathogens (<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, Enterobacteriaceae, comprising <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>) during both pre- and COVID-19 periods.<b>Gap Statement.</b> The decision to explore this topic stemmed from the urgent need to understand how the exceptional healthcare crisis of COVID-19 affected AMR patterns.<b>Methods.</b> This was an observational retrospective analysis of 1056 clinical specimens obtained from 950 patients who were admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit at Kasr Al-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.<b>Results.</b> In the period before COVID-19, 342 pathogenic isolates (135 <i>K</i>. <i>pneumoniae</i>, 83 <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa</i>, 76 <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i> and 48 <i>E. coli</i>) were obtained from samples collected from 450 patients. Conversely, during the COVID-19 period, 714 isolates (237 <i>K</i>. <i>pneumoniae</i>, 205 <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i>, 199 <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa</i> and 73 <i>E. coli</i>) were collected from the same number of patients. In the course of the pandemic, there is a slight increase in <i>A. baumannii</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections, whereas <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i> exhibit a distinct trend with a noticeable reduction in infection rates during COVID-19. During the COVID-19 period, a noticeable rise in resistance rates was observed for all antibiotics utilized. The results from Fisher's exact test indicated a substantial increase in resistance towards certain antibiotics. Specifically, a significant rise in resistance was observed for <i>E. coli</i> to ciprofloxacin (<i>P</i> = 0.00), gentamicin and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.02), levofloxacin and <i>A. baumannii</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.01), piperacillin-tazobactam and <i>A. baumannii</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.04), and piperacillin-tazobactam and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.01).<b>Conclusion.</b> Our results display how the pandemic impacted bacterial infections and antibiotic resistance, indicating a general increase in resistance rates. These findings are crucial for guiding healthcare practices, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and potentially checking antibiotic usage schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The intensified global challenge of antimicrobial resistance, set against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, is a cause for major concern. Within healthcare settings, intensive care units are recognized as focal points for Gram-negative infections. The study pursued to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of critical priority pathogens (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae, comprising Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli) during both pre- and COVID-19 periods.Gap Statement. The decision to explore this topic stemmed from the urgent need to understand how the exceptional healthcare crisis of COVID-19 affected AMR patterns.Methods. This was an observational retrospective analysis of 1056 clinical specimens obtained from 950 patients who were admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit at Kasr Al-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.Results. In the period before COVID-19, 342 pathogenic isolates (135 K. pneumoniae, 83 P. aeruginosa, 76 A. baumannii and 48 E. coli) were obtained from samples collected from 450 patients. Conversely, during the COVID-19 period, 714 isolates (237 K. pneumoniae, 205 A. baumannii, 199 P. aeruginosa and 73 E. coli) were collected from the same number of patients. In the course of the pandemic, there is a slight increase in A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa infections, whereas E. coli and K. pneumoniae exhibit a distinct trend with a noticeable reduction in infection rates during COVID-19. During the COVID-19 period, a noticeable rise in resistance rates was observed for all antibiotics utilized. The results from Fisher's exact test indicated a substantial increase in resistance towards certain antibiotics. Specifically, a significant rise in resistance was observed for E. coli to ciprofloxacin (P = 0.00), gentamicin and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.02), levofloxacin and A. baumannii (P = 0.01), piperacillin-tazobactam and A. baumannii (P = 0.04), and piperacillin-tazobactam and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.01).Conclusion. Our results display how the pandemic impacted bacterial infections and antibiotic resistance, indicating a general increase in resistance rates. These findings are crucial for guiding healthcare practices, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and potentially checking antibiotic usage schemes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及一家三甲医院重症监护室重点病原体的抗菌药耐药性模式:比较 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 时代的描述性分析。
背景。在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,全球抗菌药耐药性的挑战日益严峻,引起了人们的高度关注。在医疗机构中,重症监护室被认为是革兰氏阴性菌感染的集中地。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 期间关键重点病原体(鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肠杆菌科细菌,包括肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌)的流行率和抗菌药耐药性模式。之所以决定探讨这一主题,是因为我们迫切需要了解 COVID-19 的特殊医疗危机是如何影响 AMR 模式的。这是对埃及开罗大学 Kasr Al-Aini 医院医学重症监护室收治的 950 名患者的 1056 份临床标本进行的观察性回顾分析。在 COVID-19 之前,从 450 名患者的样本中分离出 342 个病原体(135 个肺炎克氏菌、83 个铜绿假单胞菌、76 个鲍曼不动杆菌和 48 个大肠杆菌)。相反,在 COVID-19 期间,从相同数量的患者中收集到了 714 个分离物(237 个肺炎克氏菌、205 个鲍曼不动杆菌、199 个铜绿假单胞菌和 73 个大肠杆菌)。在大流行期间,鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的感染率略有上升,而大肠埃希氏菌和肺炎双球菌的感染率在 COVID-19 期间呈明显下降趋势。在 COVID-19 期间,所有抗生素的耐药率都明显上升。费雪精确检验的结果表明,对某些抗生素的耐药性大幅上升。具体来说,大肠杆菌对环丙沙星(P = 0.00)、庆大霉素和铜绿假单胞菌(P = 0.02)、左氧氟沙星和鲍曼不动杆菌(P = 0.01)、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和鲍曼不动杆菌(P = 0.04)以及哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和铜绿假单胞菌(P = 0.01)的耐药性均有明显上升。我们的研究结果显示了大流行对细菌感染和抗生素耐药性的影响,表明耐药率普遍上升。这些发现对指导医疗保健实践至关重要,强调了持续监测和潜在检查抗生素使用计划的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antifungal resistance, clinical outcome and clinico-microbiological correlation in ocular infections due to common melanized fungi Curvularia lunata and Lasiodiplodia theobromae in South India. Genotypic analysis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli clonal complex 17 in England and Wales, 2014-2022. Nanomotion technology: an innovative method to study cell metabolism in Escherichia coli, as a potential indicator for tolerance. Association of gut microbiota with allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative profiling through 16S metagenomics and quantitative PCR. Chronic Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Fijian migrants to the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1