Investigating the time to blood culture positivity: why does it take so long?

Kerry Falconer, Robert Hammond, Benjamin J Parcell, Stephen H Gillespie
{"title":"Investigating the time to blood culture positivity: why does it take so long?","authors":"Kerry Falconer, Robert Hammond, Benjamin J Parcell, Stephen H Gillespie","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are one of the most serious infections investigated by microbiologists. However, the time to detect a BSI fails to meet the rapidity required to inform clinical decisions in real time.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Blood culture (BC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. However, the time to blood culture positivity can be lengthy. Underpinning this is the reliance on bacteria replicating to a high concentration, which is necessary for the detection using routine blood culture systems. To improve the diagnosis and management of patients with BSIs, more sensitive detection methods are required.<b>Aim.</b> The study aimed to answer key questions addressing the delay in BSI detection and whether the time to BSI detection could be expedited using a Scattered Light Integrated Collection (SLIC) device.<b>Methodology.</b> A proof-of-concept study was conducted to compare the time to positivity (TTP) of Gram-negative BCs flagging positive on BacT/ALERT with an SLIC device. An SLIC device was utilized to compare the TTP of the most prevalent BSI pathogens derived from nutrient broth and BC, the influence of bacterial load on TTP and the TTP directly from whole blood. Additionally, the overall turnaround time (TAT) of SLIC was compared with that of a standard hospital workflow.<b>Results.</b> Most pathogens tested took significantly longer to replicate when derived from BC than from nutrient medium. The median TTP of Gram-negative BC on BacT/ALERT was 13.56 h with a median bacterial load of 6.4×10<sup>9</sup> c.f.u. ml<sup>-1</sup>. All pathogens (7/7) derived from BC at a concentration of 10<sup>5</sup> c.f.u. ml<sup>-1</sup> were detectable in under 70 min on SLIC. Decreasing <i>Escherichia coli</i> BC concentration from 10<sup>5</sup> to 10<sup>2</sup> c.f.u. ml<sup>-1</sup> increased the TTP of SLIC from 15 to 85 min. Direct BSI detection from whole blood on SLIC demonstrated a 76% reduction in TAT when compared with the standard hospital workflow.<b>Conclusion.</b> An SLIC device significantly reduced the TTP of common BSI pathogens. The application of this technology could have a major impact on the detection and management of BSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are one of the most serious infections investigated by microbiologists. However, the time to detect a BSI fails to meet the rapidity required to inform clinical decisions in real time.Gap Statement. Blood culture (BC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. However, the time to blood culture positivity can be lengthy. Underpinning this is the reliance on bacteria replicating to a high concentration, which is necessary for the detection using routine blood culture systems. To improve the diagnosis and management of patients with BSIs, more sensitive detection methods are required.Aim. The study aimed to answer key questions addressing the delay in BSI detection and whether the time to BSI detection could be expedited using a Scattered Light Integrated Collection (SLIC) device.Methodology. A proof-of-concept study was conducted to compare the time to positivity (TTP) of Gram-negative BCs flagging positive on BacT/ALERT with an SLIC device. An SLIC device was utilized to compare the TTP of the most prevalent BSI pathogens derived from nutrient broth and BC, the influence of bacterial load on TTP and the TTP directly from whole blood. Additionally, the overall turnaround time (TAT) of SLIC was compared with that of a standard hospital workflow.Results. Most pathogens tested took significantly longer to replicate when derived from BC than from nutrient medium. The median TTP of Gram-negative BC on BacT/ALERT was 13.56 h with a median bacterial load of 6.4×109 c.f.u. ml-1. All pathogens (7/7) derived from BC at a concentration of 105 c.f.u. ml-1 were detectable in under 70 min on SLIC. Decreasing Escherichia coli BC concentration from 105 to 102 c.f.u. ml-1 increased the TTP of SLIC from 15 to 85 min. Direct BSI detection from whole blood on SLIC demonstrated a 76% reduction in TAT when compared with the standard hospital workflow.Conclusion. An SLIC device significantly reduced the TTP of common BSI pathogens. The application of this technology could have a major impact on the detection and management of BSI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查血培养阳性的时间:为什么需要这么长时间?
介绍。血流感染是微生物学家研究的最严重的感染之一。然而,检测BSI的时间无法满足实时告知临床决策所需的速度。差距的声明。血培养(BC)被认为是诊断血液感染的金标准。然而,血液培养阳性的时间可能很长。其基础是依赖于细菌复制到高浓度,这对于使用常规血液培养系统进行检测是必要的。为了提高对脑损伤患者的诊断和管理,需要更灵敏的检测方法。该研究旨在回答解决BSI检测延迟的关键问题,以及是否可以使用散射光集成收集(SLIC)设备加快BSI检测的时间。进行了一项概念验证研究,以比较使用SLIC装置在BacT/ALERT上标记为阳性的革兰氏阴性bc的阳性时间(TTP)。采用SLIC装置比较营养肉汤和BC中最常见的BSI病原菌的TTP,细菌负荷对TTP的影响以及直接从全血中获得的TTP。此外,SLIC的总体周转时间(TAT)与标准医院工作流程进行了比较。大多数测试的病原体从BC中获得的复制时间明显长于从营养培养基中获得的复制时间。BacT/ALERT上革兰氏阴性BC的中位TTP为13.56 h,中位细菌载量为6.4×109 c.f.u. ml-1。所有病原体(7/7)在105 c.f.u的浓度下来源于BC。ml-1在SLIC上检测不到70 min。将大肠杆菌BC浓度从105 c.f.u降低到102 c.f.u。ml-1使SLIC的TTP从15 min增加到85 min。与标准医院工作流程相比,SLIC全血直接BSI检测显示TAT降低76%。SLIC装置显著降低了常见BSI病原体的TTP。该技术的应用将对BSI的检测和管理产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preserving the antimicrobial arsenal: exploring alternatives to carbapenems in ESBL battles within the southeast of Ireland. Viral vectors: design and delivery for small RNA. Altered gut microbial profiles in drug-treated rats with alcoholic heart disease. Import of global high-risk clones is the primary driver of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Norway. Investigating the time to blood culture positivity: why does it take so long?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1