Biological invasions on Indigenous peoples’ lands

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Nature Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1038/s41893-024-01361-3
Hanno Seebens, Aidin Niamir, Franz Essl, Stephen T. Garnett, Joy A. Kumagai, Zsolt Molnár, Hanieh Saeedi, Laura A. Meyerson
{"title":"Biological invasions on Indigenous peoples’ lands","authors":"Hanno Seebens, Aidin Niamir, Franz Essl, Stephen T. Garnett, Joy A. Kumagai, Zsolt Molnár, Hanieh Saeedi, Laura A. Meyerson","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01361-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological invasions are a growing challenge in a highly interconnected and globalized world, leading to the loss of native biodiversity. Indigenous peoples’ lands (IPLs) play a vital role in biodiversity conservation through activities such as land stewardship and management practices. Similar to protected areas, they are also often remote, with fewer connections to international trade networks. The extent to which IPLs are threatened by the spread of invasive species is still unknown. Here we provide a global study detailing the distribution and drivers of alien species on IPL. On average, IPLs host 30% (in absolute numbers: 11 ± 3.5) fewer alien species relative to other lands, after controlling for sampling intensities. Alien species numbers remained consistently lower on IPLs even after accounting for potentially confounding factors such as differences in accessibility and ecological integrity. The difference may result from land management practices of Indigenous peoples. In the relatively small number of cases where IPLs host disproportionately higher numbers of alien species than other lands, the most likely reason is high alien species propagule pressure arising from proximity to large urban areas. Overall, our results highlight the importance of IPLs in protecting nature in the face of increasing biological invasions. Indigenous peoples’ lands (IPLs) are important reservoirs of biodiversity; however, the extent to which these lands are affected by the growing number of biological invasions worldwide is still unknown. This study evaluates whether IPLs harbour fewer alien species compared with other lands globally.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"7 6","pages":"737-746"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01361-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological invasions are a growing challenge in a highly interconnected and globalized world, leading to the loss of native biodiversity. Indigenous peoples’ lands (IPLs) play a vital role in biodiversity conservation through activities such as land stewardship and management practices. Similar to protected areas, they are also often remote, with fewer connections to international trade networks. The extent to which IPLs are threatened by the spread of invasive species is still unknown. Here we provide a global study detailing the distribution and drivers of alien species on IPL. On average, IPLs host 30% (in absolute numbers: 11 ± 3.5) fewer alien species relative to other lands, after controlling for sampling intensities. Alien species numbers remained consistently lower on IPLs even after accounting for potentially confounding factors such as differences in accessibility and ecological integrity. The difference may result from land management practices of Indigenous peoples. In the relatively small number of cases where IPLs host disproportionately higher numbers of alien species than other lands, the most likely reason is high alien species propagule pressure arising from proximity to large urban areas. Overall, our results highlight the importance of IPLs in protecting nature in the face of increasing biological invasions. Indigenous peoples’ lands (IPLs) are important reservoirs of biodiversity; however, the extent to which these lands are affected by the growing number of biological invasions worldwide is still unknown. This study evaluates whether IPLs harbour fewer alien species compared with other lands globally.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对土著人民土地的生物入侵
在高度相互关联和全球化的世界中,生物入侵是一个日益严峻的挑战,导致本土生物多样性的丧失。原住民土地(IPLs)通过土地管理和管理实践等活动,在生物多样性保护方面发挥着至关重要的作用。与保护区类似,它们也往往地处偏远,与国际贸易网络的联系较少。IPL 在多大程度上受到入侵物种扩散的威胁仍是未知数。在此,我们提供了一份全球研究报告,详细介绍了外来物种在 IPL 上的分布和驱动因素。在控制采样强度后,IPL上外来物种的数量平均比其他土地少30%(绝对数量:11 ± 3.5)。即使考虑了交通便利性和生态完整性差异等潜在的干扰因素,IPL 上的外来物种数量仍然持续较低。这种差异可能是土著居民的土地管理方式造成的。在相对较少的情况下,IPL 上的外来物种数量比其他土地高得不成比例,最有可能的原因是由于靠近大型城市地区,外来物种的繁殖压力较大。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了 IPL 在面对日益严重的生物入侵时保护自然的重要性。原住民土地(IPLs)是生物多样性的重要宝库;然而,这些土地在多大程度上受到全球日益增多的生物入侵的影响仍是未知数。本研究评估了土著人民土地与全球其他土地相比是否蕴藏较少的外来物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
期刊最新文献
Pick the low-hanging fruit first Landscape of litigation in the United States Outcomes and policy focus of environmental litigation in the United States Balancing rights Impacts of climate litigation on firm value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1