Siting Considerations for Satellite Observation of River Discharge

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1029/2023wr034583
Jack Eggleston, Chris Mason, Dave Bjerklie, Mike Durand, Rob Dudley, Merritt Harlan
{"title":"Siting Considerations for Satellite Observation of River Discharge","authors":"Jack Eggleston, Chris Mason, Dave Bjerklie, Mike Durand, Rob Dudley, Merritt Harlan","doi":"10.1029/2023wr034583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With growing global capability for satellite measurement of river discharge (flow) comes a need to understand and reduce error in satellite-based discharge measurements. Satellite-based discharge estimates are based on measurements of water surface width, elevation, slope, and potentially velocity. Site selection is important for reducing error and uncertainty in both conventional and satellite-based discharge measurements because geomorphic river characteristics have strong control over the relationships between discharge and width, water surface elevation (or depth), slope, and velocity. A large ground-truth data set of 8,445 conventional hydraulic measurements, collected by acoustic Doppler current profilers at 503 stations in the United States, was developed and quality assured to examine correlation between river discharge and water surface width, depth, velocity, and cross-sectional area. A separate database of river surface slope and discharge time-series was developed from paired continuous monitoring stations to examine slope-discharge correlations. Results show that discharge correlates most strongly with velocity, cross-sectional area, depth, width, and slope, in that order. Uncertainty of satellite discharge estimates is affected by observed hydraulic variable and reach-specific variability in observed variable(s) characteristics including range of variability, georegistration accuracy, and stability over time of relationships between discharge and observed hydraulic variable.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr034583","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With growing global capability for satellite measurement of river discharge (flow) comes a need to understand and reduce error in satellite-based discharge measurements. Satellite-based discharge estimates are based on measurements of water surface width, elevation, slope, and potentially velocity. Site selection is important for reducing error and uncertainty in both conventional and satellite-based discharge measurements because geomorphic river characteristics have strong control over the relationships between discharge and width, water surface elevation (or depth), slope, and velocity. A large ground-truth data set of 8,445 conventional hydraulic measurements, collected by acoustic Doppler current profilers at 503 stations in the United States, was developed and quality assured to examine correlation between river discharge and water surface width, depth, velocity, and cross-sectional area. A separate database of river surface slope and discharge time-series was developed from paired continuous monitoring stations to examine slope-discharge correlations. Results show that discharge correlates most strongly with velocity, cross-sectional area, depth, width, and slope, in that order. Uncertainty of satellite discharge estimates is affected by observed hydraulic variable and reach-specific variability in observed variable(s) characteristics including range of variability, georegistration accuracy, and stability over time of relationships between discharge and observed hydraulic variable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河流排水卫星观测的选址考虑因素
随着全球卫星测量河流排水量(流量)的能力不断提高,人们需要了解并减少卫星排水量测量的误差。基于卫星的排水量估算是基于对水面宽度、高程、坡度以及潜在流速的测量。由于河流的地貌特征对排水量与宽度、水面高程(或深度)、坡度和流速之间的关系具有很强的控制作用,因此选址对于减少传统排水量测量和卫星排水量测量的误差和不确定性非常重要。通过声学多普勒海流剖面仪在美国 503 个站点收集的 8445 个常规水力测量数据组成了一个大型地面实况数据集,该数据集的开发和质量保证旨在研究河流排水量与水面宽度、深度、流速和横截面积之间的相关性。还从配对的连续监测站点开发了一个单独的河面坡度和排水量时间序列数据库,以研究坡度与排水量之间的相关性。结果表明,排水量依次与流速、断面面积、深度、宽度和坡度的相关性最强。卫星排泄量估计值的不确定性受观测水力变量和观测变量特征中特定河段变异性的影响,包括变异范围、地理登记精度以及排泄量与观测水力变量之间关系随时间变化的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Evaluating Field Evapotranspiration Considering the Impact of Soil Salinity Gradient Information Enhanced Image Segmentation and Automatic In Situ Contact Angle Measurement Applied to Images of Multiphase Flow in Porous Media Comprehensive Flow Turbulence Metrics to Improve Bar Rack Guidance for Downstream Migrating Fish Seawater Intrusion Inhibits Nitrate Removal in Tidal Marsh Aquifers Dynamic Pricing Framework for Water Demand Management Using Advanced Metering Infrastructure Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1