Influence of torque and bone type on stability quotient of two implant platforms: a clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049
Lisiane Cristina Bannwart, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, João Paulo do Vale Souza, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva, José Vitor Quinelli Mazaro, Leda Maria Piscinini Salzedas, Marcelo Coelho Goiato
{"title":"Influence of torque and bone type on stability quotient of two implant platforms: a clinical trial.","authors":"Lisiane Cristina Bannwart, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, João Paulo do Vale Souza, Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto, Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva, José Vitor Quinelli Mazaro, Leda Maria Piscinini Salzedas, Marcelo Coelho Goiato","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of insertion torque, bone type, and peri-implant bone loss on implant stability quotient (ISQ) of cylindrical external hexagon (EH) and Morse Taper (MT) implants. Forty-four single implants were placed in the edentulous areas of 20 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Immediately after implant placement (t1) and after osseointegration (four and six months for mandible and maxilla, respectively) (t2), insertion torque, resonance frequency, and peri-implant bone loss were measured using probing depths and digital periapical radiography. A significant difference was noted in the ISQ values between t1 and t2 in type III bone for EH and MT implants. No significant difference in bone loss values was observed when comparing bone types for EH or MT in all evaluated sites. Based on marginal bone loss assessed using radiography, there was no significant difference between the MT and EH groups. A positive correlation between torque and ISQ t1 value was observed for MT (correlation: 0.439; p = 0.041) and EH (correlation: 0.461; p = 0.031) implants. For EH and MT implants, the greater the insertion torque, the greater was the ISQ value (moderately positive correlation). A weak negative correlation was found between bone type and ISQ t1 for MT implants. Contrarily, no correlation was observed between bone type and ISQ t1 for EH implants. In all cases, bone loss around the implants was clinically normal.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of insertion torque, bone type, and peri-implant bone loss on implant stability quotient (ISQ) of cylindrical external hexagon (EH) and Morse Taper (MT) implants. Forty-four single implants were placed in the edentulous areas of 20 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Immediately after implant placement (t1) and after osseointegration (four and six months for mandible and maxilla, respectively) (t2), insertion torque, resonance frequency, and peri-implant bone loss were measured using probing depths and digital periapical radiography. A significant difference was noted in the ISQ values between t1 and t2 in type III bone for EH and MT implants. No significant difference in bone loss values was observed when comparing bone types for EH or MT in all evaluated sites. Based on marginal bone loss assessed using radiography, there was no significant difference between the MT and EH groups. A positive correlation between torque and ISQ t1 value was observed for MT (correlation: 0.439; p = 0.041) and EH (correlation: 0.461; p = 0.031) implants. For EH and MT implants, the greater the insertion torque, the greater was the ISQ value (moderately positive correlation). A weak negative correlation was found between bone type and ISQ t1 for MT implants. Contrarily, no correlation was observed between bone type and ISQ t1 for EH implants. In all cases, bone loss around the implants was clinically normal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扭矩和骨质类型对两种种植体平台稳定性商数的影响:一项临床试验。
本研究旨在分析插入扭矩、骨类型和种植体周围骨质流失对圆柱形外六角(EH)和莫尔斯锥形(MT)种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的影响。在符合纳入和排除标准的 20 位患者的无牙区植入了 44 个单颗种植体。在种植体植入后(t1)和骨结合后(下颌和上颌分别为四个月和六个月)(t2),使用探查深度和数字根尖周放射摄影测量了植入扭矩、共振频率和种植体周围骨质流失。EH和MT种植体在III型骨中的ISQ值在t1和t2之间存在明显差异。在所有评估部位,比较 EH 和 MT 种植体的骨质类型,未发现骨质流失值有明显差异。根据X光片对边缘骨质流失的评估,MT组和EH组之间没有明显差异。MT(相关性:0.439;p = 0.041)和 EH(相关性:0.461;p = 0.031)种植体的扭矩和 ISQ t1 值之间呈正相关。对于 EH 和 MT 种植体,插入扭矩越大,ISQ 值也越大(中度正相关)。骨类型与 MT 种植体的 ISQ t1 之间存在微弱的负相关。相反,骨类型与 EH 种植体的 ISQ t1 之间没有相关性。在所有病例中,种植体周围的骨质流失在临床上都是正常的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brazilian Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine: current state of the study of rare diseases. A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications. A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study. Cross-cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Scale for Brazilian adolescents. Influence of the digital file format on radiographic diagnostic in dentistry: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1