Relationship between Subjective Grip Strength and Physical Functioning among Community-Dwelling Older Women.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI:10.3390/geriatrics9030068
Kohei Iwamoto, Yuki Kikuchi, Hideki Nakano, Tsuyoshi Katsurasako, Kohei Mori, Kayoko Shiraiwa, Jun Horie, Shin Murata
{"title":"Relationship between Subjective Grip Strength and Physical Functioning among Community-Dwelling Older Women.","authors":"Kohei Iwamoto, Yuki Kikuchi, Hideki Nakano, Tsuyoshi Katsurasako, Kohei Mori, Kayoko Shiraiwa, Jun Horie, Shin Murata","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9030068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between subjective grip strength and physical function in community-dwelling older women. Subjective grip strength was assessed using a questionnaire, and physical function and body composition were compared between groups with strong and weak subjective grip strength. Additionally, the two groups were compared in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and those with normal cognitive function, respectively. The results showed significant differences in grip strength (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 30 s chair-stand (CS-30) test (<i>p</i> = 0.039), timed up-and-go (TUG) test (<i>p</i> = 0.027), maximal gait speed (<i>p</i> = 0.029), and skeletal muscle mass (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Older adults with normal cognitive function showed significant differences in grip strength (<i>p</i> < 0.001), quadriceps muscle strength (<i>p</i> < 0.009), one-leg standing time (<i>p</i> = 0.041), CS-30 (<i>p</i> = 0.002), TUG (<i>p</i> = 0.014), gait speed (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and skeletal muscle mass (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Older adults with low subjective grip strength had lower physical function and skeletal muscle mass. However, no items showed significant differences between groups among older adults with MCI. Thus, subjective grip strength is an indicator of an overall decline in physical function and a reduction in skeletal muscle mass in older adults, and cognitive function should be considered when assessing subjective grip strength in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9030068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between subjective grip strength and physical function in community-dwelling older women. Subjective grip strength was assessed using a questionnaire, and physical function and body composition were compared between groups with strong and weak subjective grip strength. Additionally, the two groups were compared in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and those with normal cognitive function, respectively. The results showed significant differences in grip strength (p < 0.001), 30 s chair-stand (CS-30) test (p = 0.039), timed up-and-go (TUG) test (p = 0.027), maximal gait speed (p = 0.029), and skeletal muscle mass (p < 0.001). Older adults with normal cognitive function showed significant differences in grip strength (p < 0.001), quadriceps muscle strength (p < 0.009), one-leg standing time (p = 0.041), CS-30 (p = 0.002), TUG (p = 0.014), gait speed (p = 0.006), and skeletal muscle mass (p = 0.003). Older adults with low subjective grip strength had lower physical function and skeletal muscle mass. However, no items showed significant differences between groups among older adults with MCI. Thus, subjective grip strength is an indicator of an overall decline in physical function and a reduction in skeletal muscle mass in older adults, and cognitive function should be considered when assessing subjective grip strength in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社区居住的老年妇女中,主观握力与身体功能之间的关系。
本研究调查了居住在社区的老年妇女的主观握力与身体功能之间的关系。通过问卷对主观握力进行了评估,并对主观握力强和主观握力弱两组的身体功能和身体组成进行了比较。此外,还分别对轻度认知障碍(MCI)组和认知功能正常组进行了比较。结果显示,两组在握力(p < 0.001)、30 秒椅子站立(CS-30)测试(p = 0.039)、定时站立行走(TUG)测试(p = 0.027)、最大步速(p = 0.029)和骨骼肌质量(p < 0.001)方面存在明显差异。认知功能正常的老年人在握力(p < 0.001)、股四头肌肌力(p < 0.009)、单腿站立时间(p = 0.041)、CS-30(p = 0.002)、TUG(p = 0.014)、步速(p = 0.006)和骨骼肌质量(p = 0.003)方面存在显著差异。主观握力低的老年人身体功能和骨骼肌质量都较低。然而,在患有 MCI 的老年人中,没有任何项目显示出组间的显著差异。因此,主观握力是老年人身体功能整体下降和骨骼肌质量减少的一个指标,在评估老年人的主观握力时应考虑认知功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
Bridging Generations Through Movement: "How and Why" Intergenerational Programs Operate-A Systematic and Narrative Review. Task-Based Eating and Drinking Interventions in Animal Models: A Narrative Review of Functional Improvements and Neuromuscular Adaptations in Age-Related Dysphagia. On the Road Safety: Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Driving Behaviors Among Seniors Aged 65 and Older. Oral Function, Loneliness, Depression, and Social Participation Among Physically Disabled Middle-Aged and Older Adult Individuals: Insights from a Japanese Cross-Sectional Study. Oral Health Assessment for Older Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities Using Video Recording by a Mobile Electronic Device.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1