Isochrony as ancestral condition to call and song in a primate

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15151
Chiara De Gregorio, Marco Maiolini, Teresa Raimondi, Filippo Carugati, Longondraza Miaretsoa, Daria Valente, Valeria Torti, Cristina Giacoma, Andrea Ravignani, Marco Gamba
{"title":"Isochrony as ancestral condition to call and song in a primate","authors":"Chiara De Gregorio,&nbsp;Marco Maiolini,&nbsp;Teresa Raimondi,&nbsp;Filippo Carugati,&nbsp;Longondraza Miaretsoa,&nbsp;Daria Valente,&nbsp;Valeria Torti,&nbsp;Cristina Giacoma,&nbsp;Andrea Ravignani,&nbsp;Marco Gamba","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal songs differ from calls in function and structure, and have comparative and translational value, showing similarities to human music. Rhythm in music is often distributed in quantized classes of intervals known as rhythmic categories. These classes have been found in the songs of a few nonhuman species but never in their calls. Are rhythmic categories song-specific, as in human music, or can they transcend the song–call boundary? We analyze the vocal displays of one of the few mammals producing both songs and call sequences: <i>Indri indri</i>. We test whether rhythmic categories (a) are conserved across songs produced in different contexts, (b) exist in call sequences, and (c) differ between songs and call sequences. We show that rhythmic categories occur across vocal displays. Vocalization type and function modulate deployment of categories. We find isochrony (1:1 ratio, like the rhythm of a ticking clock) in all song types, but only advertisement songs show three rhythmic categories (1:1, 1:2, 2:1 ratios). Like songs, some call types are also isochronous. Isochrony is the backbone of most indri vocalizations, unlike human speech, where it is rare. In indri, isochrony underlies both songs and hierarchy-less call sequences and might be ancestral to both.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal songs differ from calls in function and structure, and have comparative and translational value, showing similarities to human music. Rhythm in music is often distributed in quantized classes of intervals known as rhythmic categories. These classes have been found in the songs of a few nonhuman species but never in their calls. Are rhythmic categories song-specific, as in human music, or can they transcend the song–call boundary? We analyze the vocal displays of one of the few mammals producing both songs and call sequences: Indri indri. We test whether rhythmic categories (a) are conserved across songs produced in different contexts, (b) exist in call sequences, and (c) differ between songs and call sequences. We show that rhythmic categories occur across vocal displays. Vocalization type and function modulate deployment of categories. We find isochrony (1:1 ratio, like the rhythm of a ticking clock) in all song types, but only advertisement songs show three rhythmic categories (1:1, 1:2, 2:1 ratios). Like songs, some call types are also isochronous. Isochrony is the backbone of most indri vocalizations, unlike human speech, where it is rare. In indri, isochrony underlies both songs and hierarchy-less call sequences and might be ancestral to both.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等时性是灵长类叫声和鸣声的祖先条件
动物歌曲在功能和结构上与叫声不同,具有比较和转化价值,与人类音乐有相似之处。音乐中的节奏通常分布在被称为节奏类别的量化音程类别中。在一些非人类物种的歌曲中发现了这些类别,但在它们的叫声中却从未发现过。在人类音乐中,节奏类别是歌曲特有的,还是可以超越歌曲与叫声的界限?我们分析了为数不多的既能唱歌又能发出叫声的哺乳动物的声音表现:Indri indri。我们测试了节奏类别是否(a)在不同背景下产生的歌曲中是一致的,(b)是否存在于叫声序列中,以及(c)是否在歌曲和叫声序列之间存在差异。我们的研究表明,节奏类别出现在不同的发声方式中。发声类型和功能会调节类别的部署。我们在所有歌曲类型中都发现了等时性(1:1 的比例,就像滴答作响的钟表的节奏),但只有广告歌曲显示出三种节奏类别(1:1、1:2、2:1 的比例)。与歌曲一样,某些叫声类型也具有等时性。等时性是大多数茚满鸟类发声的基础,与人类语言不同,人类语言中很少有等时性。在靛蓝猴中,等时性是歌曲和无等级的叫声序列的基础,可能是两者的祖先。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The underlying architecture of musical sensibility: One general factor, four subdimensions, and strong genetic effects Correction to Modeled impacts of bouillon fortification with micronutrients on child mortality in Senegal, Burkina Faso, and Nigeria Seventy-five years of impactful environmental and occupational health research at the Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine at New York University Auditory-motor synchronization in developmental coordination disorder: Effects on interlimb coordination during walking and running.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1