Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet in Patients With Celiac Disease.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002911
Wajiha Mehtab, Anita Malhotra, Ashish Upadhyay, Namrata Singh, Ashish Agarwal, Ashish Chauhan, Shubham Mehta, Anam Ahmed, Alka Singh, V Sreenivas, Anupa Siddhu, Vineet Ahuja, Govind K Makharia
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet in Patients With Celiac Disease.","authors":"Wajiha Mehtab, Anita Malhotra, Ashish Upadhyay, Namrata Singh, Ashish Agarwal, Ashish Chauhan, Shubham Mehta, Anam Ahmed, Alka Singh, V Sreenivas, Anupa Siddhu, Vineet Ahuja, Govind K Makharia","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Life-long adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) and its assessment is essential for patients with celiac disease (CeD). We have developed and validated a tool for assessing adherence to GFD which can be used by both physicians and dietitians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1: Development, content validation, and assessment of reliability of tool. Phase 2: Validation of tool against standard dietary evaluation (SDE) (gold standard), immunoglobulin A - anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA anti-tTG Ab), and gluten immunogenic peptides in urine. Overall, 380 biopsy-confirmed patients with CeD (derivation cohort: n = 100 [phase 1], n = 210 [phase 2] and independent validation cohort, n = 70) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of an initial 90-point questionnaire, 84 items (Celiac Disease: Compliance Assessment Test [CD-CAT.v1]) were retained after content validation and pilot testing. In phase 1, upon administering CD-CAT.v1 on 100 patients, a comprehensive 35-item tool (CD-CAT.v2; α = 0.86) was obtained after removing items with low test-retest reliability and item-rest correlation values. In phase 2, upon administering CD-CAT.v2 on 210 patients, 22 items were removed having low correlation values (R < 0.4) with SDE. Finally, a 13-item tool (CD-CAT.v3; α = 0.84) was obtained with high criterion validity with SDE ( r = 0.806, P < 0.001), moderate convergent validity with celiac disease adherence test ( r = 0.602, P = 0.007), and moderate to weak correlation with urine gluten immunogenic peptides ( r = 0.46, P = 0.001) and IgA anti-tTG Ab ( r = 0.39, P = 0.008), respectively. The final 13-item tool also strongly correlated with SDE ( r = 0.78, P < 0.001) in an independent validation cohort of 70 patients with CeD. Principal component analysis identified 3 relevant subscales with a cumulative variance of 62%. The sensitivity and specificity of CD-CAT.v3 were 80% and 91%, respectively, with an area under curve of 0.905 with SDE. The obtained cutoff score of <19 from the receiver operating characteristic curve was further categorized as 13 = excellent, 14-18 = very good, 19-28 = average, and >28 = poor adherence to GFD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CD-CAT is a new and rapid tool for monitoring dietary adherence to GFD with high sensitivity and specificity, which can be administered by both physicians and dietitians.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"2501-2509"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002911","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Life-long adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) and its assessment is essential for patients with celiac disease (CeD). We have developed and validated a tool for assessing adherence to GFD which can be used by both physicians and dietitians.

Methods: Phase 1: Development, content validation, and assessment of reliability of tool. Phase 2: Validation of tool against standard dietary evaluation (SDE) (gold standard), immunoglobulin A - anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA anti-tTG Ab), and gluten immunogenic peptides in urine. Overall, 380 biopsy-confirmed patients with CeD (derivation cohort: n = 100 [phase 1], n = 210 [phase 2] and independent validation cohort, n = 70) were recruited.

Results: Of an initial 90-point questionnaire, 84 items (Celiac Disease: Compliance Assessment Test [CD-CAT.v1]) were retained after content validation and pilot testing. In phase 1, upon administering CD-CAT.v1 on 100 patients, a comprehensive 35-item tool (CD-CAT.v2; α = 0.86) was obtained after removing items with low test-retest reliability and item-rest correlation values. In phase 2, upon administering CD-CAT.v2 on 210 patients, 22 items were removed having low correlation values (R < 0.4) with SDE. Finally, a 13-item tool (CD-CAT.v3; α = 0.84) was obtained with high criterion validity with SDE ( r = 0.806, P < 0.001), moderate convergent validity with celiac disease adherence test ( r = 0.602, P = 0.007), and moderate to weak correlation with urine gluten immunogenic peptides ( r = 0.46, P = 0.001) and IgA anti-tTG Ab ( r = 0.39, P = 0.008), respectively. The final 13-item tool also strongly correlated with SDE ( r = 0.78, P < 0.001) in an independent validation cohort of 70 patients with CeD. Principal component analysis identified 3 relevant subscales with a cumulative variance of 62%. The sensitivity and specificity of CD-CAT.v3 were 80% and 91%, respectively, with an area under curve of 0.905 with SDE. The obtained cutoff score of <19 from the receiver operating characteristic curve was further categorized as 13 = excellent, 14-18 = very good, 19-28 = average, and >28 = poor adherence to GFD.

Discussion: CD-CAT is a new and rapid tool for monitoring dietary adherence to GFD with high sensitivity and specificity, which can be administered by both physicians and dietitians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证用于评估乳糜泻患者无麸质饮食依从性的工具(乳糜泻:依从性评估测试;CD-CAT)。
目的:终生坚持无麸质饮食(GFD)及其评估对乳糜泻(CeD)患者至关重要。我们开发并验证了一种评估无麸质饮食依从性的工具,可供医生和营养师使用:第一阶段:工具的开发、内容验证和可靠性评估。第二阶段:对照标准饮食评估(SDE)(金标准)、IgA 抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体(IgA-anti-tTG Ab)和尿液中的谷蛋白免疫原肽(Urine-GIP)对工具进行验证。共招募了 380 名活检确诊的 CeD 患者[衍生队列:n=100(第一阶段)、n=210(第二阶段)和独立验证队列,n=70]:结果:在最初的 90 分问卷中,经过内容验证和试点测试后保留了 84 个项目(CD-CAT.v1)。在第一阶段,对100名患者进行CD-CAT.v1测试后,删除了测试-再测信度和项目-休息相关值较低的项目,得到了35个项目的综合工具(CD-CAT.v2;α=0.86)。在第二阶段,对210名患者进行CD-CAT.v2测试后,删除了22个相关性较低的项目(R28=GFD依从性较差):CD-CAT是一种新的、快速的监测胃食管反流饮食依从性的工具,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,医生和营养师均可使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
期刊最新文献
Response to Dai et al. Risk of extrahepatic malignancies in patients with autoimmune hepatitis: a nationwide cohort study. Delisting From Liver Transplant List for Improvement and Re-compensation Among Decompensated Patients at one-year. More Is Not Always Better: Challenging the Dogma of Secondary Prophylaxis for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1