What we don't know about what babies know: Reconsidering psychophysics, exploration, and infant behavior.

IF 16.6 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X23003217

Karen E Adolph, Mark A Schmuckler

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers must infer "what babies know" based on what babies do. Thus, to maximize information from doing, researchers should use tasks and tools that capture the richness of infants' behaviors. We clarify Gibson's views about the richness of infants' behavior and their exploration in the service of guiding action - what Gibson called "learning about affordances."

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

婴儿知道什么，我们不知道什么：重新考虑心理物理学、探索和婴儿行为。

研究人员必须根据婴儿的所作所为来推断 "婴儿知道什么"。因此，为了最大限度地从 "做 "中获取信息，研究人员应使用能捕捉婴儿丰富行为的任务和工具。我们澄清了吉布森关于婴儿行为丰富性的观点，以及他们为指导行动而进行的探索--吉布森称之为 "学习能力"。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.

期刊最新文献

Bayes beyond the predictive distribution. Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds. Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition. Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes. Is human compositionality meta-learned?