Long Nguyen-Hoang, Linh Thuy Dinh, Angela S T Tai, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Ritsuko K Pooh, Arihiro Shiozaki, Mingming Zheng, Yali Hu, Bin Li, Aditya Kusuma, Piengbulan Yapan, Arundhati Gosavi, Mayumi Kaneko, Suchaya Luewan, Tung-Yao Chang, Noppadol Chaiyasit, Tongta Nanthakomon, Huishu Liu, Steven W Shaw, Wing Cheong Leung, Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy, Angela Aguilar, Hillary H Y Leung, Nikki M W Lee, So Ling Lau, Isabella Y M Wah, Xiaohong Lu, Daljit S Sahota, Marc K C Chong, Liona C Poon
{"title":"Implementation of First-Trimester Screening and Prevention of Preeclampsia: A Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial in Asia.","authors":"Long Nguyen-Hoang, Linh Thuy Dinh, Angela S T Tai, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Ritsuko K Pooh, Arihiro Shiozaki, Mingming Zheng, Yali Hu, Bin Li, Aditya Kusuma, Piengbulan Yapan, Arundhati Gosavi, Mayumi Kaneko, Suchaya Luewan, Tung-Yao Chang, Noppadol Chaiyasit, Tongta Nanthakomon, Huishu Liu, Steven W Shaw, Wing Cheong Leung, Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy, Angela Aguilar, Hillary H Y Leung, Nikki M W Lee, So Ling Lau, Isabella Y M Wah, Xiaohong Lu, Daljit S Sahota, Marc K C Chong, Liona C Poon","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03941886.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":"1223-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":38.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia.
Methods: Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.
Results: Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.
Conclusions: The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale.
背景:本试验旨在评估亚洲地区早产子痫前期(PE)孕前筛查和预防策略的有效性、可接受性和安全性:该试验旨在评估亚洲地区早产子痫前期(PE)首诊筛查预防策略的有效性、可接受性和安全性:在2019年8月1日至2022年2月28日期间,这项多中心阶梯楔形群组随机试验纳入了亚洲十个地区的产科/诊断单位。试验开始时,所有招募中心均提供常规产前护理,不进行与研究相关的干预。每隔六周,一个群组被随机从非干预阶段转入干预阶段。在干预阶段,妇女在一胎时使用基于贝叶斯定理的三重检测法进行早产儿 PE 筛查。结果显示,调整后早产 PE 风险≥ 1/100的高风险妇女接受了低剂量阿司匹林治疗:总体而言,88.04%(42,897/48,725)的妇女同意接受第一胎早产 PE 筛查。在干预阶段被确定为高风险的产妇中,82.39%(2919/3543 人)接受了阿司匹林预防治疗。干预阶段和非干预阶段的早产 PE 发生率无明显差异(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.59;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.91 至 2.77)。然而,在干预阶段的高危妇女中,阿司匹林预防与早产 PE 发生率降低 41% 显著相关(aOR 0.59;95%CI 0.37 至 0.92)。此外,它还能使结论分娩时的 PE 发生率分别降低 54%、55% 和 64%:对早产 PE 实施筛查和预防策略与显著降低早产 PE 的发生率无关。然而,低剂量阿司匹林可有效降低高危产妇早产 PE 的发生率 41%。针对早产 PE 的筛查和预防策略得到了来自不同种族背景的妇女群体的高度认可,而不仅仅局限于最初制定该策略的人群。这些研究结果证明了在全球范围内广泛实施早产 PE 筛查和预防策略的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.