Circulation最新文献

Precision medicine aims to provide personalized clinical care guided by tools that reflect underlying pathophysiology. The need for such an approach has never been greater in cardiovascular medicine, given the large number of guideline-directed medical therapies available. However, progress has been modest to date with few precision tools available for clinicians. Arguably, cardiovascular prevention and population health are poised for innovation to guide evaluation and management, as these areas are already informed by risk-assessment, but limited by the use of crude assessment tools with marginal performance. Risk assessment in prevention and population health may be improved with the use of genetics, circulating biomarkers, and imaging, leading to outcome-specific risk-prediction and enhanced phenotyping. Personalized management matching therapy to risk profile can be then implemented for either individuals or groups, improving cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit. Here, we explore this precision-like approach, including available tools, potential applications, and future perspectives for cardiovascular prevention and population health management.

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is clinically relevant, but evidence is lacking. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding.

Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 32 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either an 18-month or a 6-month rivaroxaban treatment. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at 18 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 18 months according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that an 18-month treatment was superior to a 6-month treatment in terms of the primary end point.

Results: From February 2021 to March 2023, 179 patients were randomized, and after the exclusion of one patient who withdrew consent, 178 were included in the intention-to-treat population: 89 patients in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and 89 in the 6-month rivaroxaban group. The mean age was 65.7 years; 47% of the patients were men, and 12% had symptoms of PE at baseline. The primary end point of recurrent VTE occurred in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 17 of the 89 (19.1%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.72]; P=0.01). Among 22 recurrent VTE, 5 patients presented with a symptomatic recurrent VTE; recurrent PE occurred in 11 patients, including 2 with main and 4 with lobar PEs; and recurrent deep vein thrombosis was seen in 11 patients, including 3 with proximal deep vein thromboses. The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 7 of the 89 patients (7.8 %) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.44-4.70]; P=0.55).

Conclusions: In patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, the 18-month rivaroxaban treatment was superior to the 6-month rivaroxaban treatment with respect to recurrent VTE events.

Background: Patients with heart failure, a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and obesity have significant disability and suffer frequent exacerbations of heart failure. We hypothesized that tirzepatide, a long-acting agonist of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors, would improve a comprehensive suite of clinical endpoints, including measures of health status, functional capacity, quality of life, exercise tolerance, patient well-being, and medication burden in these patients.

Methods: 731 patients in class II-IV heart failure, ejection fraction ≥50%, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m² were randomized(double-blind) to tirzepatide(titrated up to 15mg subcutaneously weekly)(n=364) or placebo(n=367), added to background therapy for a median of 104 weeks (Q1=66, Q3=126 weeks).

Primary endpoints: tirzepatide reduced the combined risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure and improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score(KCCQ-CSS). The current expanded analysis included sensitivity analyses of the primary endpoints, 6-minute walk distance(6MWD), EQ-5D-5L health state index, Patient Global Impression of Severity Overall Health(PGIS), NYHA class, use of heart failure medications, and a hierarchical composite based on all-cause death, worsening heart failure, and 52-week changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD.

Results: Patients were aged 65.2±10.7, 53.8%(n=393) were female; BMI 38.2±6.7kg/m², KCCQ-CSS 53.5±18.5, 6MWD 302.8±81.7meters, and 53%(n=388) had a worsening heart failure event in the prior 12 months. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide produced a consistent beneficial effect across all composites of death and worsening heart failure events, analyzed as time-to-first-event (hazard ratios 0.41-0.67). At 52 weeks, tirzepatide increased KCCQ-CSS 6.9 points (95%CI, 3.3, 10.6, P<0.001), 6MWD 18.3 meters (95%CI, 9.9, 26.7, P<0.001) and EQ-5D-5L 0.06 (95%CI, 0.03, 0.09, P<0.001). The tirzepatide group shifted to a more favorable PGIS (proportional odds ratio 1.99 (95%CI, 1.44, 2.76) and NYHA class (proportional odds ratio 2.26 (95%CI, 1.54, 3.31), both P<0.001 and required less heart failure medications (P=0.015). The broad spectrum of effects was reflected in benefits on the hierarchical composite (win ratio 1.63, 95%CI, 1.17, 2.28;P=0.004).

Conclusions: Tirzepatide produced a comprehensive, meaningful improvement in heart failure across multiple complementary domains; enhanced health status, quality of life, functional capacity, exercise tolerance and well-being; and reduced symptoms and medication burden in patients with HFpEF and obesity.