Impact of colonoscopy on health-related quality of life: findings from the RECEDE study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1186/s12955-024-02262-x
L Andronis, N Waugh, M Zanganeh, A Krishnamoorthy, N Parsons, M Hull, P Wheatstone, R P Arasaradnam
{"title":"Impact of colonoscopy on health-related quality of life: findings from the RECEDE study.","authors":"L Andronis, N Waugh, M Zanganeh, A Krishnamoorthy, N Parsons, M Hull, P Wheatstone, R P Arasaradnam","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02262-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool but the procedure and the preparation for it cause anxiety and discomfort that impacts on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The 'disutility' of undergoing an invasive colonoscopy needs to be considered and accounted for in comprehensive cost-utility analyses that compare different diagnostic strategies, yet there is little empirical evidence that can be used in such studies. To fill this gap, we collected and analysed data on the effect of a colonoscopy examination on patients' HRQoL that can be used in economic evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy at a large NHS hospital were asked to complete the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L instrument: (i) before the procedure, at the time of consent (T1), (ii) while undergoing bowel preparation (T2) and (iii) within 24 h after the procedure (T3). Complete responses were translated into preference-based HRQoL (utility) values using a UK-specific value set and were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and seventy-one patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred for a colonoscopy provided complete EQ-5D-5 L questionnaires at all three assessment points. At T1, the mean EQ-5D-5 L value was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.734-0.786). This value dropped to 0.727 at T2 (95%CI: 0.7-0.754, before increasing again to 0.794 (95%CI: 0.768-0.819) at T3. Both changes were statistically significant (p-value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preference-based HRQoL (utility) values reported by patients undergoing a colonoscopy dropped during bowel preparation and rose again shortly after the colonoscopy. This pattern was largely consistent across patients with different characteristics, symptoms and diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"22 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02262-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool but the procedure and the preparation for it cause anxiety and discomfort that impacts on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The 'disutility' of undergoing an invasive colonoscopy needs to be considered and accounted for in comprehensive cost-utility analyses that compare different diagnostic strategies, yet there is little empirical evidence that can be used in such studies. To fill this gap, we collected and analysed data on the effect of a colonoscopy examination on patients' HRQoL that can be used in economic evaluations.

Methods: Patients scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy at a large NHS hospital were asked to complete the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L instrument: (i) before the procedure, at the time of consent (T1), (ii) while undergoing bowel preparation (T2) and (iii) within 24 h after the procedure (T3). Complete responses were translated into preference-based HRQoL (utility) values using a UK-specific value set and were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical analyses.

Results: Two-hundred and seventy-one patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred for a colonoscopy provided complete EQ-5D-5 L questionnaires at all three assessment points. At T1, the mean EQ-5D-5 L value was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.734-0.786). This value dropped to 0.727 at T2 (95%CI: 0.7-0.754, before increasing again to 0.794 (95%CI: 0.768-0.819) at T3. Both changes were statistically significant (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusions: Preference-based HRQoL (utility) values reported by patients undergoing a colonoscopy dropped during bowel preparation and rose again shortly after the colonoscopy. This pattern was largely consistent across patients with different characteristics, symptoms and diagnoses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠镜检查对健康相关生活质量的影响:RECEDE 研究结果。
背景:结肠镜检查是一种有价值的诊断工具,但检查过程和准备工作会引起焦虑和不适,影响患者与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)。在比较不同诊断策略的综合成本效用分析中,需要考虑并计算接受侵入性结肠镜检查的 "非效用性",但可用于此类研究的经验证据却很少。为了填补这一空白,我们收集并分析了结肠镜检查对患者 HRQoL 影响的数据,这些数据可用于经济评估:方法:我们要求计划在一家大型 NHS 医院接受结肠镜检查的患者完成 EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L 工具:(i) 术前,在同意时(T1);(ii) 在进行肠道准备时(T2);(iii) 术后 24 小时内(T3)。使用英国特定的数值集将完整的回答转化为基于偏好的 HRQoL(效用)值,并使用描述性和推断性统计分析进行分析:271 名转诊接受结肠镜检查的胃肠道症状患者在所有三个评估点均提供了完整的 EQ-5D-5 L 问卷。在 T1,EQ-5D-5 L 的平均值为 0.76(95%CI:0.734-0.786)。这一数值在 T2 时降至 0.727(95%CI:0.7-0.754),然后在 T3 时再次升至 0.794(95%CI:0.768-0.819)。这两个变化均具有统计学意义(P 值 结论):接受结肠镜检查的患者所报告的基于偏好的 HRQoL(效用)值在肠道准备期间下降,在结肠镜检查后不久再次上升。这种模式在具有不同特征、症状和诊断的患者中基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Development of updated population norms for the SF-36 for Hungary and comparison with 1997-1998 norms. Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals. Personality traits and quality of life: a cross-sectional study in a middle-aged Iranian general population. A COSMIN systematic review of instruments for evaluating health-related quality of life in people with Hereditary Angioedema. Patients reported outcome of cognitive function scale: a psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1