The impact of updates in headache quality measures on adherence to best practices in a neurology resident clinic: A quality improvement study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1111/head.14754
Robert H Cascella, Christopher C Anderson, Enmanuel J Perez
{"title":"The impact of updates in headache quality measures on adherence to best practices in a neurology resident clinic: A quality improvement study.","authors":"Robert H Cascella, Christopher C Anderson, Enmanuel J Perez","doi":"10.1111/head.14754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply the 2019 joint American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and American Headache Society (AHS) quality measures for headache management to a cohort of neurology resident physicians and then assess outcomes related to guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimization of headache management is essential to reduce both the individual and systemic impact of these disorders. In 2014, the AAN developed 10 quality measures for evidence-based management of patients with headache. A workgroup updated and condensed its headache quality measures in 2019, narrowing the set to six measurements, four of which would primarily focus on the management of migraine and two of which would address the management of cluster headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study was conducted using a pretest-posttest study design. A pre-intervention survey based on retrospective analysis of five clinic notes for adherence to the measures was designed and distributed to all neurology residents (n = 32) at a large, academic tertiary referral center. The intervention included the creation of an electronic medical record template to aid residents in following the measures during clinical encounters, as well as the provision of direct feedback based on pre-intervention results. Finally, a post-intervention survey was distributed for completion based on notes written during the intervention period. Analysis was limited to migraine, given the low percentage of cluster headache seen in clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in adherence was seen in three of the four migraine-related quality measures, with the Use of Abortive Medications for Migraine and Documentation of Counseling on Modifiable Lifestyle and Chronification Factors demonstrating statistically significant improvements (75.8% to 88.0% [p = 0.013] and 83.9% to 94.0% [p = 0.029] adherence, respectively). For secondary outcomes, the increase in the utilization of appropriate diagnostic criteria (82.6% to 93.2%, p = 0.018) was significant, and the self-assessed confidence rating for adherence to guidelines was significant (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence that the quality improvement intervention led to increased adherence to the AAN and AHS migraine-related measures. It is anticipated that increased adherence may lead to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1329-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To apply the 2019 joint American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and American Headache Society (AHS) quality measures for headache management to a cohort of neurology resident physicians and then assess outcomes related to guideline adherence.

Background: The optimization of headache management is essential to reduce both the individual and systemic impact of these disorders. In 2014, the AAN developed 10 quality measures for evidence-based management of patients with headache. A workgroup updated and condensed its headache quality measures in 2019, narrowing the set to six measurements, four of which would primarily focus on the management of migraine and two of which would address the management of cluster headache.

Methods: This quality improvement study was conducted using a pretest-posttest study design. A pre-intervention survey based on retrospective analysis of five clinic notes for adherence to the measures was designed and distributed to all neurology residents (n = 32) at a large, academic tertiary referral center. The intervention included the creation of an electronic medical record template to aid residents in following the measures during clinical encounters, as well as the provision of direct feedback based on pre-intervention results. Finally, a post-intervention survey was distributed for completion based on notes written during the intervention period. Analysis was limited to migraine, given the low percentage of cluster headache seen in clinic.

Results: An increase in adherence was seen in three of the four migraine-related quality measures, with the Use of Abortive Medications for Migraine and Documentation of Counseling on Modifiable Lifestyle and Chronification Factors demonstrating statistically significant improvements (75.8% to 88.0% [p = 0.013] and 83.9% to 94.0% [p = 0.029] adherence, respectively). For secondary outcomes, the increase in the utilization of appropriate diagnostic criteria (82.6% to 93.2%, p = 0.018) was significant, and the self-assessed confidence rating for adherence to guidelines was significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the quality improvement intervention led to increased adherence to the AAN and AHS migraine-related measures. It is anticipated that increased adherence may lead to improved patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头痛质量衡量标准的更新对神经病学住院医师诊所坚持最佳实践的影响:质量改进研究。
目的:将 2019 年美国神经病学学会 (AAN) 和美国头痛学会 (AHS) 联合制定的头痛管理质量标准应用于神经病学住院医师队列,然后评估与遵守指南相关的结果:背景:优化头痛管理对于减少这些疾病对个人和系统的影响至关重要。2014 年,AAN 针对头痛患者的循证管理制定了 10 项质量措施。2019年,一个工作组更新并精简了头痛质量测量方法,将测量方法缩减为六种,其中四种主要针对偏头痛的管理,两种针对丛集性头痛的管理:这项质量改进研究采用了前测-后测研究设计。在对五份门诊记录进行回顾性分析的基础上,设计了一项干预前调查,并分发给一家大型三级学术转诊中心的所有神经病学住院医师(n = 32)。干预措施包括创建电子病历模板,以帮助住院医师在临床诊治过程中遵守措施,并根据干预前的结果提供直接反馈。最后,根据干预期间撰写的笔记,分发干预后调查表供填写。鉴于集束性头痛在门诊中所占比例较低,因此分析仅限于偏头痛:结果:在四项偏头痛相关质量测量中,有三项的依从性有所提高,其中偏头痛终止药物的使用和可改变的生活方式及慢性化因素的咨询记录在统计学上有显著改善(依从性分别从75.8%提高到88.0% [p = 0.013] 和83.9%提高到94.0% [p = 0.029])。在次要结果方面,适当诊断标准使用率的提高(从 82.6% 提高到 93.2%,p = 0.018)具有显著性,对遵守指南的自评信心评级也具有显著性(p 结论:本研究为质量改进项目提供了证据:本研究提供的证据表明,质量改进干预措施提高了对 AAN 和 AHS 偏头痛相关措施的依从性。预计遵守率的提高可能会改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1