首页 > 最新文献

Headache最新文献

英文 中文
Editorial: Migraine as a marker of maternal morbidity. 社论:偏头痛是产妇发病的标志。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-20 DOI: 10.1111/head.70090
Barlas Benkli
{"title":"Editorial: Migraine as a marker of maternal morbidity.","authors":"Barlas Benkli","doi":"10.1111/head.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147485786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal and child mental health and incident migraine in adolescence: An "All Our Families" prospective cohort study. 母婴心理健康与青少年偏头痛:一项“我们所有的家庭”前瞻性队列研究
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1111/head.70078
Kirsten Sjonnesen, Melanie Noel, Tamara Pringsheim, Scott B Patten, Sheri Madigan, Prachi Khanna, Sheila McDonald, Paul E Ronksley, Suzanne Tough, Serena L Orr

Objective: To examine the association between mental health symptoms in youth and their mothers, and youth incident migraine, using prospectively collected, longitudinal data from the "All Our Families" (AOF) cohort study.

Background: Internalizing mental health symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, whether experienced by a child or his/her parent(s), have been linked to migraine and chronic pain conditions, but causal inferences have been limited by gaps in the current literature. We hypothesized a priori that elevated youth and/or maternal internalizing symptoms across childhood would be associated with elevated odds of incident migraine in early adolescence, providing insights into the modifiable mental health contributors to incident migraine.

Methods: A community-recruited sample of urban youth (N = 1062, 48% female) living in Alberta, Canada were followed through the AOF prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2023. The study outcome, youth migraine, was ascertained through a validated migraine diagnostic questionnaire, administered to 12-year-old youth. The exposures of interest, anxiety and depressive symptoms in youth and mothers, were derived from multiple timepoints when these symptoms were measured, across youth ages 4-12 years. The analysis compared odds of incident migraine in youth with a history of elevated internalizing symptoms, and/or exposure to elevated maternal symptoms, versus unexposed youth. Covariates accounted for included age, sex, gender and racial identity, household income, and parental migraine status.

Results: The odds of incident migraine, diagnosed at a mean age of 12.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 0.8 years) were increased by ~29% with each additional timepoint when maternal anxiety symptoms were elevated across childhood (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29 per exposure, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.64, p = 0.036). Similarly, the odds of incident migraine increased by ~29% with each additional exposure to significant youth depressive symptoms across childhood (aOR 1.29 per exposure, 95% CI 1.03-1.61, p = 0.026). Sex did not modify this association.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that maternal anxiety and youth depressive symptoms have an antecedent role in youth migraine risk. Although certain migraine risk factors remain non-modifiable (e.g., genetic inheritance), child and parent mental health symptoms may be alleviated through evidence-based mental health treatments. Future clinical research should explore whether reducing exposure to child and parent mental health symptoms could prevent or delay the development of new migraine cases ("incident migraine").

目的:通过“所有家庭”(AOF)队列研究前瞻性收集的纵向数据,研究青少年及其母亲的心理健康症状与青少年偏头痛之间的关系。背景:内化的心理健康症状,如焦虑和抑郁,无论是由孩子还是他/她的父母经历,都与偏头痛和慢性疼痛有关,但由于目前文献的空白,因果推论受到限制。我们先验地假设,童年时期青少年和/或母亲内化症状的增加与青春期早期偏头痛发生率的增加有关,从而为偏头痛发生率的可改变的心理健康因素提供了见解。方法:从2008年到2023年,对加拿大阿尔伯塔省社区招募的城市青年(N = 1062, 48%为女性)进行AOF前瞻性队列研究。研究结果,青年偏头痛,是通过一个有效的偏头痛诊断问卷确定,给予12岁的青少年。青少年和母亲的兴趣、焦虑和抑郁症状暴露是在4-12岁青少年中测量这些症状时的多个时间点得出的。该分析比较了有内化症状升高史和/或暴露于母体症状升高史的青年与未暴露于母体症状升高的青年发生偏头痛的几率。协变量包括年龄、性别、性别和种族认同、家庭收入和父母偏头痛状况。结果:当母亲焦虑症状在儿童期升高时,每增加一个时间点,平均年龄为12.9岁(标准差[SD] 0.8岁)诊断出偏头痛的几率增加约29%(每次暴露的校正优势比[aOR] 1.29, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.02-1.64, p = 0.036)。同样,在儿童期,每增加一次明显的青少年抑郁症状暴露,偏头痛的发生率增加约29%(每次暴露的aOR为1.29,95% CI为1.03-1.61,p = 0.026)。性并没有改变这种联系。结论:研究结果提示,母亲焦虑和青少年抑郁症状在青少年偏头痛风险中具有先兆作用。虽然某些偏头痛风险因素仍然是不可改变的(例如,基因遗传),但儿童和父母的心理健康症状可以通过循证心理健康治疗得到缓解。未来的临床研究应该探索减少儿童和父母的心理健康症状是否可以预防或延缓新偏头痛病例的发展(“偶发性偏头痛”)。
{"title":"Maternal and child mental health and incident migraine in adolescence: An \"All Our Families\" prospective cohort study.","authors":"Kirsten Sjonnesen, Melanie Noel, Tamara Pringsheim, Scott B Patten, Sheri Madigan, Prachi Khanna, Sheila McDonald, Paul E Ronksley, Suzanne Tough, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between mental health symptoms in youth and their mothers, and youth incident migraine, using prospectively collected, longitudinal data from the \"All Our Families\" (AOF) cohort study.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Internalizing mental health symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, whether experienced by a child or his/her parent(s), have been linked to migraine and chronic pain conditions, but causal inferences have been limited by gaps in the current literature. We hypothesized a priori that elevated youth and/or maternal internalizing symptoms across childhood would be associated with elevated odds of incident migraine in early adolescence, providing insights into the modifiable mental health contributors to incident migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-recruited sample of urban youth (N = 1062, 48% female) living in Alberta, Canada were followed through the AOF prospective cohort study from 2008 to 2023. The study outcome, youth migraine, was ascertained through a validated migraine diagnostic questionnaire, administered to 12-year-old youth. The exposures of interest, anxiety and depressive symptoms in youth and mothers, were derived from multiple timepoints when these symptoms were measured, across youth ages 4-12 years. The analysis compared odds of incident migraine in youth with a history of elevated internalizing symptoms, and/or exposure to elevated maternal symptoms, versus unexposed youth. Covariates accounted for included age, sex, gender and racial identity, household income, and parental migraine status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The odds of incident migraine, diagnosed at a mean age of 12.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 0.8 years) were increased by ~29% with each additional timepoint when maternal anxiety symptoms were elevated across childhood (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29 per exposure, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.64, p = 0.036). Similarly, the odds of incident migraine increased by ~29% with each additional exposure to significant youth depressive symptoms across childhood (aOR 1.29 per exposure, 95% CI 1.03-1.61, p = 0.026). Sex did not modify this association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that maternal anxiety and youth depressive symptoms have an antecedent role in youth migraine risk. Although certain migraine risk factors remain non-modifiable (e.g., genetic inheritance), child and parent mental health symptoms may be alleviated through evidence-based mental health treatments. Future clinical research should explore whether reducing exposure to child and parent mental health symptoms could prevent or delay the development of new migraine cases (\"incident migraine\").</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147480658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delayed urticaria during treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine. 抗cgrp单克隆抗体治疗偏头痛的延迟性荨麻疹。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-15 DOI: 10.1111/head.70082
Christoph T Berger, Federico Burguet Villena, Severin B Vogt, Lukas Heydrich, Karin Hartmann, Athina Papadopoulou

Objective: To characterize clinical presentation and management of urticaria associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) -targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for migraine prophylaxis.

Background: CGRP-targeting mAbs are effective in migraine prophylaxis, but have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria. The underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic consequences of these anti-CGRP mAb-related hypersensitivity reactions remain poorly understood.

Methods: We performed a retrospective case series with descriptive analysis on five patients who developed urticaria after anti-CGRP mAb administration. Timing of reactions, history of urticaria, re-exposure strategies including premedication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed by chart review.

Results: Urticaria occurred after the first injection in three patients and after the third or sixth injection in two. Onset was delayed (12-48 h) in all patients, indicating a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Four of five patients had a prior history of urticaria. All patients were re-exposed: two to the same anti-CGRP mAb and three to a different. Three patients received H1-antihistamine premedication. All premedicated patients in this series tolerated re-exposure, irrespective of switching. One patient experienced worsening urticaria with repeated dosing without premedication despite negative allergy testing, but later tolerated the same anti-CGRP mAb with premedication. In contrast, urticaria or angioedema recurred in two patients who switched anti-CGRP mAb without premedication. One subsequently tolerated rimegepant.

Conclusion: Anti-CGRP mAb-associated urticaria in this case series was delayed and likely non-immunoglobulin E (non-IgE)-mediated. Our experience supports that in selected patients with delayed urticaria, individualized management, including H1 antihistamine premedication, may allow continuation of effective migraine prophylaxis. Larger cohorts are needed to identify risk factors and to inform general management recommendations.

目的:探讨降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)靶向单克隆抗体(mab)预防偏头痛相关荨麻疹的临床表现和治疗。背景:cgrp靶向单克隆抗体在偏头痛预防中有效,但与过敏反应相关,包括荨麻疹。这些抗cgrp单克隆抗体相关的过敏反应的潜在机制、危险因素和治疗后果仍然知之甚少。方法:我们对5例服用抗cgrp单抗后出现荨麻疹的患者进行回顾性病例系列和描述性分析。通过图表回顾分析反应时间、荨麻疹史、再暴露策略(包括用药前)和临床结果。结果:3例患者在第一次注射后出现荨麻疹,2例患者在第三次或第六次注射后出现荨麻疹。所有患者的发病延迟(12-48小时),表明非ige介导的超敏反应。5例患者中有4例既往有荨麻疹病史。所有患者再次暴露:2例使用相同的抗cgrp单抗,3例使用不同的单抗。3例患者接受h1 -抗组胺药预用药。在这个系列中,所有预先用药的患者都能耐受再次暴露,无论是否转换。一名患者在没有预先用药的情况下反复给药,尽管过敏试验呈阴性,但荨麻疹恶化,但后来在预先用药的情况下耐受了相同的抗cgrp单抗。相比之下,在没有预先用药的情况下切换抗cgrp单抗的两名患者中,荨麻疹或血管性水肿复发。一个人随后忍受了巨大的痛苦。结论:本病例系列中抗cgrp单克隆抗体相关性荨麻疹是延迟性的,可能是非免疫球蛋白E(非ige)介导的。我们的经验支持,在选定的延迟性荨麻疹患者中,个体化管理,包括H1抗组胺药物的预用药,可能允许持续有效的偏头痛预防。需要更大的队列来确定风险因素并为一般管理建议提供信息。
{"title":"Delayed urticaria during treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine.","authors":"Christoph T Berger, Federico Burguet Villena, Severin B Vogt, Lukas Heydrich, Karin Hartmann, Athina Papadopoulou","doi":"10.1111/head.70082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize clinical presentation and management of urticaria associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) -targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for migraine prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>CGRP-targeting mAbs are effective in migraine prophylaxis, but have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria. The underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic consequences of these anti-CGRP mAb-related hypersensitivity reactions remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective case series with descriptive analysis on five patients who developed urticaria after anti-CGRP mAb administration. Timing of reactions, history of urticaria, re-exposure strategies including premedication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed by chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urticaria occurred after the first injection in three patients and after the third or sixth injection in two. Onset was delayed (12-48 h) in all patients, indicating a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Four of five patients had a prior history of urticaria. All patients were re-exposed: two to the same anti-CGRP mAb and three to a different. Three patients received H1-antihistamine premedication. All premedicated patients in this series tolerated re-exposure, irrespective of switching. One patient experienced worsening urticaria with repeated dosing without premedication despite negative allergy testing, but later tolerated the same anti-CGRP mAb with premedication. In contrast, urticaria or angioedema recurred in two patients who switched anti-CGRP mAb without premedication. One subsequently tolerated rimegepant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-CGRP mAb-associated urticaria in this case series was delayed and likely non-immunoglobulin E (non-IgE)-mediated. Our experience supports that in selected patients with delayed urticaria, individualized management, including H1 antihistamine premedication, may allow continuation of effective migraine prophylaxis. Larger cohorts are needed to identify risk factors and to inform general management recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cortical synchronization of spontaneous trigeminal neuropathic pain monitored with in vivo optical imaging of calcium activity in freely moving mice. 自由活动小鼠体内钙活性光学成像监测自发性三叉神经性疼痛的皮质同步化。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-15 DOI: 10.1111/head.70084
Qianxi Liu, Zhenxing Li, Hongyi Wang, Qian Qin, Dong Huang, Rong Hu, Xing Liu, Haocheng Zhou

Objective: To determine the impact of neuropathic lesion on cortical synchronization in processing spontaneous pain-like behavior.

Background: In vivo optical monitoring of neuronal activity may provide insightful mechanisms underlying the complexity of spontaneous pain-like behavior in freely moving animals.

Methods: We examined the synchronized pattern of the pyramidical neurons in anterior cingulate cortex during spontaneous grooming behavior using optical monitoring of Ca2+ activity. A chronic constriction injury of infraorbital nerve model was performed to induce trigeminal neuropathic pain. We then analyzed the synchronized patterns of cortical population and computed Shannon entropy values to assess the uncertainty of neural coding during spontaneous pain-like behavior.

Results: Following nerve injury, mice exhibited significantly prolonged isolated grooming behavior compared to the control group. Our data indicate that, while neuropathic pain enhanced synchronized activity of cortical network during spontaneous grooming behavior, craniofacial nociception reduced the uncertainty of neural firing. Interestingly, this transition to a synchronized state of cortical ensembles in neuropathic pain conditions was significantly disrupted by spontaneous grooming behavior.

Conclusion: Our findings provided a method of monitoring the synchronized activity of cortical ensemble in freely moving animals. Synchronization index may be used to decode spontaneous neuropathic pain-like behavior.

目的:探讨神经性病变对自发性痛样行为皮层同步性的影响。背景:对神经元活动的体内光学监测可能为自由运动动物自发疼痛样行为的复杂性提供深刻的机制。方法:我们检查了同步模式的锥体神经元在前扣带皮层自发梳理行为使用光学监测Ca2+活性。建立慢性眶下神经收缩损伤模型,诱导三叉神经痛。然后,我们分析了皮质种群的同步模式,并计算了香农熵值,以评估自发性疼痛样行为中神经编码的不确定性。结果:与对照组相比,神经损伤后小鼠表现出明显延长的孤立梳理行为。我们的数据表明,虽然神经性疼痛增强了自发梳理行为时皮质网络的同步活动,但颅面伤害感觉降低了神经放电的不确定性。有趣的是,在神经性疼痛条件下,这种向皮质集合同步状态的转变被自发的梳理行为显著破坏。结论:我们的发现提供了一种监测自由运动动物皮质集合同步活动的方法。同步指数可用于解码自发性神经性疼痛样行为。
{"title":"Cortical synchronization of spontaneous trigeminal neuropathic pain monitored with in vivo optical imaging of calcium activity in freely moving mice.","authors":"Qianxi Liu, Zhenxing Li, Hongyi Wang, Qian Qin, Dong Huang, Rong Hu, Xing Liu, Haocheng Zhou","doi":"10.1111/head.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the impact of neuropathic lesion on cortical synchronization in processing spontaneous pain-like behavior.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In vivo optical monitoring of neuronal activity may provide insightful mechanisms underlying the complexity of spontaneous pain-like behavior in freely moving animals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the synchronized pattern of the pyramidical neurons in anterior cingulate cortex during spontaneous grooming behavior using optical monitoring of Ca<sup>2+</sup> activity. A chronic constriction injury of infraorbital nerve model was performed to induce trigeminal neuropathic pain. We then analyzed the synchronized patterns of cortical population and computed Shannon entropy values to assess the uncertainty of neural coding during spontaneous pain-like behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following nerve injury, mice exhibited significantly prolonged isolated grooming behavior compared to the control group. Our data indicate that, while neuropathic pain enhanced synchronized activity of cortical network during spontaneous grooming behavior, craniofacial nociception reduced the uncertainty of neural firing. Interestingly, this transition to a synchronized state of cortical ensembles in neuropathic pain conditions was significantly disrupted by spontaneous grooming behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provided a method of monitoring the synchronized activity of cortical ensemble in freely moving animals. Synchronization index may be used to decode spontaneous neuropathic pain-like behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-marketing safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants: A systematic review of spontaneous reporting system data. CGRP单克隆抗体和基因的上市后安全性:对自发报告系统数据的系统回顾。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-15 DOI: 10.1111/head.70081
Martina Giacon, Salvatore Terrazzino
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants), have transformed migraine treatment. Although clinical trials established their efficacy and initial safety, post-marketing surveillance is essential for understanding their real-world safety profile in a broader population. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and synthesize findings from published pharmacovigilance studies that analyze potential safety signals for CGRP inhibitors using major international databases, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the World Health Organization's (WHO's) VigiBase, and EudraVigilance, in order to establish a comprehensive real-world safety profile to guide clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in major electronic databases for studies published up to September 2025. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent researchers. We included original research articles analyzing FAERS, VigiBase, or EudraVigilance for AEs associated with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, or zavegepant. Data on key signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) and quantitative measures of disproportionality were extracted and synthesized thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 30 eligible studies. For mAbs, consistent SDRs included injection site reactions, alopecia (e.g., fremanezumab reporting odds ratio (ROR) ranging from 2.73 to 6.9), constipation (primarily for erenumab, RORs ranging from 4.92 to 17.94), and a range of cardiovascular events. For gepants, common SDRs included nausea and fatigue or somnolence, with highly specific SDRs for severe constipation for atogepant (ROR<sub>025</sub> = 19.99) and dysgeusia for zavegepant (ROR<sub>025</sub> = 212.07), linked to its nasal administration. A critical divergence was observed for rare but serious cerebrovascular events: SDRs for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS [erenumab ROR 9.43, 95% confidence interval {CI} 4.5-19.8]) and cervical artery dissection (CeAD [galcanezumab ROR 14.0, 95% CI 6.22-31.4]) were associated with certain mAbs. Conversely, no such SDRs have been detected for gepants to date, although this distinction requires confirmation as real-world exposure increases. However, a class-level SDR for cerebrovascular diseases as a whole was identified for CGRP inhibitors as a group (ROR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33). Also notable were shared SDRs for Raynaud's phenomenon and alopecia across both subclasses. Finally, concerning safety in pregnancy, the data are complex: while comprehensive class-level analyses did not identify a disproportionality signal compared to triptans, some analyses of individual drugs have identified reporting patterns that warra
目的:降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)抑制剂,包括单克隆抗体(mab)和小分子拮抗剂(gepants),已经改变了偏头痛的治疗。尽管临床试验确定了它们的有效性和初始安全性,但上市后监测对于了解它们在更广泛人群中的实际安全性至关重要。因此,本研究旨在系统地回顾和综合已发表的药物警戒研究的结果,这些研究使用主要的国际数据库,包括美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)、世界卫生组织(WHO)的VigiBase和EudraVigilance,分析CGRP抑制剂的潜在安全性信号,以建立一个全面的真实世界的安全性概况来指导临床实践。方法:系统检索截至2025年9月发表的主要电子数据库。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估由两名独立研究人员进行。我们纳入了分析FAERS、VigiBase或EudraVigilance与erenumab、galcanezumab、fremanezumab、eptinezumab、rimegepant、ubrogepant、atogepant或zavegepant相关的ae的原始研究文章。对不成比例报告(SDRs)的关键信号数据和不成比例量化指标进行了提取和综合。结果:检索确定了30项符合条件的研究。对于单克隆抗体,一致的sdr包括注射部位反应、脱发(例如fremanezumab报告的优势比(ROR)在2.73至6.9之间)、便秘(主要是erenumab, ROR在4.92至17.94之间)和一系列心血管事件。对受试者来说,常见的特别表现包括恶心、疲劳或嗜睡,而佐佐格坦对严重便秘(ROR025 = 19.99)和佐佐格坦(ROR025 = 212.07)具有高度特异性的特别表现,这与鼻腔给药有关。在罕见但严重的脑血管事件中观察到一个关键的分歧:可逆性脑血管收缩综合征(RCVS [erenumab ROR 9.43, 95%可信区间{CI} 4.5-19.8])和颈动脉夹层(CeAD [galcanezumab ROR 14.0, 95% CI 6.22-31.4])的sds与某些单抗相关。相反,到目前为止,还没有检测到这种特别提款权,尽管这种区别需要随着现实世界暴露的增加而得到证实。然而,CGRP抑制剂作为一组被确定为脑血管疾病的类水平SDR (ROR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33)。同样值得注意的是,雷诺现象和脱发在两个亚类中都有共同的sdr。最后,关于妊娠安全性,数据是复杂的:虽然综合分类水平分析并没有发现与曲坦类药物相比的不成比例信号,但对个别药物的一些分析已经确定了报告模式,需要谨慎解释,强调需要进一步专门的药物警戒研究,以充分阐明该人群的安全性概况。结论:本系统综述证实,CGRP抑制剂具有可控但复杂的安全性。它可以区分与一些单克隆抗体相关但与患者无关的罕见、严重脑血管事件(RCVS、CeAD),以及雷诺现象和脱发等共同的不良反应。从erenumab的明显便秘SDR到zavegepant独特的焦虑症,安全性的显著异质性挑战了CGRP抑制剂作为单一类别的观点。这些发现为个性化风险评估提供了明确的理论依据,使临床医生能够根据个体患者的情况量身定制治疗。
{"title":"Post-marketing safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants: A systematic review of spontaneous reporting system data.","authors":"Martina Giacon, Salvatore Terrazzino","doi":"10.1111/head.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70081","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants), have transformed migraine treatment. Although clinical trials established their efficacy and initial safety, post-marketing surveillance is essential for understanding their real-world safety profile in a broader population. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and synthesize findings from published pharmacovigilance studies that analyze potential safety signals for CGRP inhibitors using major international databases, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the World Health Organization's (WHO's) VigiBase, and EudraVigilance, in order to establish a comprehensive real-world safety profile to guide clinical practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A systematic search was conducted in major electronic databases for studies published up to September 2025. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent researchers. We included original research articles analyzing FAERS, VigiBase, or EudraVigilance for AEs associated with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, or zavegepant. Data on key signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) and quantitative measures of disproportionality were extracted and synthesized thematically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The search identified 30 eligible studies. For mAbs, consistent SDRs included injection site reactions, alopecia (e.g., fremanezumab reporting odds ratio (ROR) ranging from 2.73 to 6.9), constipation (primarily for erenumab, RORs ranging from 4.92 to 17.94), and a range of cardiovascular events. For gepants, common SDRs included nausea and fatigue or somnolence, with highly specific SDRs for severe constipation for atogepant (ROR&lt;sub&gt;025&lt;/sub&gt; = 19.99) and dysgeusia for zavegepant (ROR&lt;sub&gt;025&lt;/sub&gt; = 212.07), linked to its nasal administration. A critical divergence was observed for rare but serious cerebrovascular events: SDRs for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS [erenumab ROR 9.43, 95% confidence interval {CI} 4.5-19.8]) and cervical artery dissection (CeAD [galcanezumab ROR 14.0, 95% CI 6.22-31.4]) were associated with certain mAbs. Conversely, no such SDRs have been detected for gepants to date, although this distinction requires confirmation as real-world exposure increases. However, a class-level SDR for cerebrovascular diseases as a whole was identified for CGRP inhibitors as a group (ROR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33). Also notable were shared SDRs for Raynaud's phenomenon and alopecia across both subclasses. Finally, concerning safety in pregnancy, the data are complex: while comprehensive class-level analyses did not identify a disproportionality signal compared to triptans, some analyses of individual drugs have identified reporting patterns that warra","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differential impact of migraine on severe maternal morbidity and postpartum readmissions: Insights from a national cohort study. 偏头痛对严重产妇发病率和产后再入院的不同影响:来自一项国家队列研究的见解。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.70080
Michelle T Tram, Nan Cheng, Crystal Jicha

Objective: This study evaluates severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and hospital readmissions in women with migraine.

Background: There has been a rising incidence of SMM and growing urgency to monitor SMM as a measure of maternal outcomes. Migraine is the leading cause of disability in reproductive-aged women and is linked to numerous obstetric comorbidities that likely contribute to SMM, rehospitalization, and resulting healthcare costs. However, population-level data examining these outcomes are limited.

Methods: Using the 2019 National Readmissions Database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of index characteristics and postpartum rehospitalizations for women with migraine from January to November 2019. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, and indications for readmission were obtained. Odds of SMM at delivery and 30-day nonelective readmission were compared between women with and without migraine. Validated obstetric comorbidity scores and cost of hospitalization were also compared. Models were adjusted for baseline patient and hospital demographics, method of delivery, body mass index (BMI), aspirin use, and obstetric comorbidities.

Results: Out of all qualifying deliveries in 2019, 22,074 women had migraine (1.2%). Only 14.2% of these women had a specific migraine diagnosis (n = 3145), of whom 61.7% had migraine with aura (MA; n = 1941) and 38.3% had migraine without aura (MO; n = 1204). Overall, women with migraine had higher obstetric comorbidity scores than those without migraine. Higher odds of SMM were also associated with migraine (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.68, 1.96]). However, after additionally adjusting for comorbidities, this relationship was no longer significant. In contrast, migraine was independently associated with greater odds of 30-day postpartum readmission (migraine: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29, 95% CI [1.17, 1.41]; MO: aOR 1.49, 95% CI [1.02, 2.10]) and higher hospitalization costs (migraine: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.18, 95% CI [1.17, 1.19]).

Conclusion: Women with migraine have higher obstetric comorbidity scores, which may contribute to the elevated risk of SMM. Migraine itself is independently associated with increased 30-day nonelective readmission rates and hospitalization costs. These associations, along with the large number of unspecified migraine diagnoses, highlight the importance of thorough migraine screening and documentation, which may help guide interventions to improve maternal outcomes and reduce healthcare burden.

目的:本研究评估重度产妇发病率(SMM)和偏头痛妇女的再入院率。背景:SMM的发病率不断上升,监测SMM作为衡量产妇结局的一项措施日益紧迫。偏头痛是育龄妇女致残的主要原因,并与许多产科合并症有关,这些合并症可能导致SMM、再住院和由此产生的医疗费用。然而,检验这些结果的人口水平数据是有限的。方法:利用2019年国家再入院数据库,对2019年1月至11月偏头痛女性的指标特征和产后再住院情况进行回顾性队列分析。获得基线人口统计学、医院特征和再入院指征。比较有偏头痛和无偏头痛妇女分娩时SMM和30天非选择性再入院的几率。还比较了有效的产科合并症评分和住院费用。根据基线患者和医院人口统计、分娩方式、体重指数(BMI)、阿司匹林使用和产科合并症对模型进行了调整。结果:在2019年所有符合条件的分娩中,有22,074名女性患有偏头痛(1.2%)。这些女性中只有14.2%有特定的偏头痛诊断(n = 3145),其中61.7%为先兆偏头痛(MA, n = 1941), 38.3%为无先兆偏头痛(MO, n = 1204)。总的来说,患有偏头痛的女性比没有偏头痛的女性有更高的产科合并症得分。SMM的高几率也与偏头痛相关(优势比[OR] 1.82, 95%可信区间[CI][1.68, 1.96])。然而,在额外调整合并症后,这种关系不再显著。相反,偏头痛与产后30天再入院的几率较大(偏头痛:调整比值比[aOR] 1.29, 95% CI [1.17, 1.41]; MO:调整比值比[aOR] 1.49, 95% CI[1.02, 2.10])和较高的住院费用(偏头痛:调整发病率比[aIRR] 1.18, 95% CI[1.17, 1.19])独立相关。结论:女性偏头痛患者有较高的产科合并症评分,这可能导致SMM的风险升高。偏头痛本身与增加的30天非选择性再入院率和住院费用独立相关。这些关联,以及大量未明确的偏头痛诊断,突出了彻底的偏头痛筛查和记录的重要性,这可能有助于指导干预措施,以改善产妇结局和减轻医疗负担。
{"title":"Differential impact of migraine on severe maternal morbidity and postpartum readmissions: Insights from a national cohort study.","authors":"Michelle T Tram, Nan Cheng, Crystal Jicha","doi":"10.1111/head.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and hospital readmissions in women with migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a rising incidence of SMM and growing urgency to monitor SMM as a measure of maternal outcomes. Migraine is the leading cause of disability in reproductive-aged women and is linked to numerous obstetric comorbidities that likely contribute to SMM, rehospitalization, and resulting healthcare costs. However, population-level data examining these outcomes are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2019 National Readmissions Database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of index characteristics and postpartum rehospitalizations for women with migraine from January to November 2019. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, and indications for readmission were obtained. Odds of SMM at delivery and 30-day nonelective readmission were compared between women with and without migraine. Validated obstetric comorbidity scores and cost of hospitalization were also compared. Models were adjusted for baseline patient and hospital demographics, method of delivery, body mass index (BMI), aspirin use, and obstetric comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of all qualifying deliveries in 2019, 22,074 women had migraine (1.2%). Only 14.2% of these women had a specific migraine diagnosis (n = 3145), of whom 61.7% had migraine with aura (MA; n = 1941) and 38.3% had migraine without aura (MO; n = 1204). Overall, women with migraine had higher obstetric comorbidity scores than those without migraine. Higher odds of SMM were also associated with migraine (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.68, 1.96]). However, after additionally adjusting for comorbidities, this relationship was no longer significant. In contrast, migraine was independently associated with greater odds of 30-day postpartum readmission (migraine: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29, 95% CI [1.17, 1.41]; MO: aOR 1.49, 95% CI [1.02, 2.10]) and higher hospitalization costs (migraine: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.18, 95% CI [1.17, 1.19]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with migraine have higher obstetric comorbidity scores, which may contribute to the elevated risk of SMM. Migraine itself is independently associated with increased 30-day nonelective readmission rates and hospitalization costs. These associations, along with the large number of unspecified migraine diagnoses, highlight the importance of thorough migraine screening and documentation, which may help guide interventions to improve maternal outcomes and reduce healthcare burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147456649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microneedles for the treatment of migraine and orofacial pain: A narrative review. 微针治疗偏头痛和口面部疼痛:综述。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.70074
Baicheng Cao, Qiuyi Chen, Yuhan Liu, Ruozhou Wu, Bin Li, Qing Cai, Lu Liu
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a common neurological disorder and a primary headache condition. Despite its central origin, migraine pain may be referred to the orofacial region via trigeminal pathways, resulting in phenotypic overlap with other orofacial pain (OFP) conditions. OFP represents a highly prevalent and heterogeneous group of pain disorders that substantially impair quality of life. Microneedle (MN) technology enables minimally invasive, localized, or transdermal drug delivery and has emerged as a promising mechanism-guided strategy for the management of migraine and other OFP conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to systematically summarize the current evidence on MN-based technologies for the treatment of migraine and other OFP conditions and discuss the therapeutic implications, limitations, and future directions of MN technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a narrative review. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to November 18, 2025. English-language studies evaluating MN-based technologies for migraine and other OFP conditions, including temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and oral mucosal ulcers, in animal models or human participants were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were included, covering migraine (n = 4), TMD (n = 2), and oral mucosal ulcers (n = 5). Across included studies, evidence for MN-based interventions was most advanced in migraine. Preclinical studies demonstrated that transdermal or intranasal MN systems enabled rapid and reliable drug absorption, with bioavailability comparable to subcutaneous injection. Clinical studies of MN-mediated triptan delivery reported high rates of 2 h pain relief and freedom from the most bothersome migraine-associated symptoms, with generally mild and transient local skin reactions. Beyond migraine, MNs were explored for TMD and oral mucosal ulcers, where they enabled localized and sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and promoted tissue healing, although evidence in these conditions remains limited and largely preclinical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MN-based drug delivery represents a promising, minimally invasive strategy for migraine and other OFP management, with the strongest and most clinically relevant evidence currently available for acute migraine treatment. By enabling rapid and reliable drug absorption while bypassing gastrointestinal limitations, MNs may enhance the effectiveness of migraine-specific therapies. Emerging preclinical evidence further suggests potential applicability of MN platforms in other OFP conditions, including TMD and oral mucosal ulcers, through localized and sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory delivery. Future research should prioritize migraine-focused optimization of MN materials and designs, alongside disease-specific expansion and standardized pain-related outcome reporti
背景:偏头痛是一种常见的神经系统疾病,是一种原发性头痛疾病。尽管其中心起源,偏头痛可能通过三叉神经通路涉及到口面部区域,导致与其他口面部疼痛(OFP)病症的表型重叠。OFP是一种非常普遍和异质性的疼痛障碍,严重损害了生活质量。微针(MN)技术可以实现微创、局部或透皮给药,并已成为治疗偏头痛和其他OFP疾病的一种有前途的机制指导策略。目的:本综述旨在系统总结目前基于MN技术治疗偏头痛和其他OFP疾病的证据,并讨论MN技术的治疗意义、局限性和未来发展方向。方法:本研究为叙述性综述。系统检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,检索时间从网站成立到2025年11月18日。在动物模型或人类参与者中,评估基于mn的技术治疗偏头痛和其他OFP疾病(包括颞下颌疾病(TMD)和口腔粘膜溃疡)的英语研究被纳入。结果:纳入了11项研究,包括偏头痛(n = 4)、TMD (n = 2)和口腔粘膜溃疡(n = 5)。在所有纳入的研究中,基于神经网络的干预治疗偏头痛的证据最先进。临床前研究表明,经皮或鼻内MN系统能够快速可靠地吸收药物,其生物利用度与皮下注射相当。mn介导的曲坦类药物递送的临床研究报告了高比率的2小时疼痛缓解和最麻烦的偏头痛相关症状的自由,通常是轻微和短暂的局部皮肤反应。除了偏头痛,MNs还被用于TMD和口腔粘膜溃疡,在这些情况下,它们能够实现局部和持续的镇痛和抗炎作用,并促进组织愈合,尽管在这些情况下的证据仍然有限,而且主要是临床前的。结论:基于mn的给药是偏头痛和其他OFP治疗的一种很有前景的微创策略,目前有最有力和最具临床相关性的证据可用于急性偏头痛治疗。通过绕过胃肠道限制,实现快速可靠的药物吸收,MNs可以增强偏头痛特异性治疗的有效性。新出现的临床前证据进一步表明,MN平台可能适用于其他OFP疾病,包括TMD和口腔粘膜溃疡,通过局部和持续的镇痛和抗炎递送。未来的研究应优先考虑以偏头痛为重点的MN材料和设计的优化,以及疾病特异性扩展和标准化的疼痛相关结果报告,以促进更广泛的临床转化。
{"title":"Microneedles for the treatment of migraine and orofacial pain: A narrative review.","authors":"Baicheng Cao, Qiuyi Chen, Yuhan Liu, Ruozhou Wu, Bin Li, Qing Cai, Lu Liu","doi":"10.1111/head.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70074","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Migraine is a common neurological disorder and a primary headache condition. Despite its central origin, migraine pain may be referred to the orofacial region via trigeminal pathways, resulting in phenotypic overlap with other orofacial pain (OFP) conditions. OFP represents a highly prevalent and heterogeneous group of pain disorders that substantially impair quality of life. Microneedle (MN) technology enables minimally invasive, localized, or transdermal drug delivery and has emerged as a promising mechanism-guided strategy for the management of migraine and other OFP conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This review aims to systematically summarize the current evidence on MN-based technologies for the treatment of migraine and other OFP conditions and discuss the therapeutic implications, limitations, and future directions of MN technologies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This study is a narrative review. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to November 18, 2025. English-language studies evaluating MN-based technologies for migraine and other OFP conditions, including temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and oral mucosal ulcers, in animal models or human participants were included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Eleven studies were included, covering migraine (n = 4), TMD (n = 2), and oral mucosal ulcers (n = 5). Across included studies, evidence for MN-based interventions was most advanced in migraine. Preclinical studies demonstrated that transdermal or intranasal MN systems enabled rapid and reliable drug absorption, with bioavailability comparable to subcutaneous injection. Clinical studies of MN-mediated triptan delivery reported high rates of 2 h pain relief and freedom from the most bothersome migraine-associated symptoms, with generally mild and transient local skin reactions. Beyond migraine, MNs were explored for TMD and oral mucosal ulcers, where they enabled localized and sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and promoted tissue healing, although evidence in these conditions remains limited and largely preclinical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;MN-based drug delivery represents a promising, minimally invasive strategy for migraine and other OFP management, with the strongest and most clinically relevant evidence currently available for acute migraine treatment. By enabling rapid and reliable drug absorption while bypassing gastrointestinal limitations, MNs may enhance the effectiveness of migraine-specific therapies. Emerging preclinical evidence further suggests potential applicability of MN platforms in other OFP conditions, including TMD and oral mucosal ulcers, through localized and sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory delivery. Future research should prioritize migraine-focused optimization of MN materials and designs, alongside disease-specific expansion and standardized pain-related outcome reporti","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147456611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A study of migraine-like headache caused by topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist tapinarof. 外用芳基烃受体激动剂tapinarof致偏头痛样头痛的研究。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-06 DOI: 10.1111/head.70077
Toshiyuki Hikita, Toshiyuki Kudo, Yasuko Ogawa, Natsue Nakamoto, Kiyomi Ito
{"title":"A study of migraine-like headache caused by topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist tapinarof.","authors":"Toshiyuki Hikita, Toshiyuki Kudo, Yasuko Ogawa, Natsue Nakamoto, Kiyomi Ito","doi":"10.1111/head.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70077","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147369510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology and characteristics of status migrainosus in a tertiary headache clinic: A retrospective cohort study. 三级头痛诊所偏头痛状态的流行病学和特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-06 DOI: 10.1111/head.70067
Evelyn Dorsey, Jennifer Robblee

Objective: Assess the epidemiology and characteristics of status migrainosus (SM) in a cohort of patients from a tertiary care headache clinic to identify the prevalence, 1-year incidence, attack features, treatments, and healthcare utilization for SM.

Background: SM is a debilitating migraine attack lasting at least 72 h according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. SM has not been well characterized.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated SM in a subspecialty headache center in Arizona using chart review from electronic health records for patients seen in 2022. The primary endpoints were clinic-observed lifetime prevalence and 1-year incidence (January 1 to December 31, 2022) of SM. Secondary outcomes assessed the clinical features and treatments tried for the SM attacks using descriptive statistics from those with sufficient detail available in electronic health records.

Results: A total of 1184 patients seen in 2022 were screened; of those, 1043 (88.1%) had a diagnosis of migraine, including 458 patients with any lifetime episode of SM, with 373 meeting inclusion criteria. The median age was 47.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38.0, 57.0) and 87.7% were female (327/373). The majority had chronic migraine and nearly half reported a history of aura. The clinic-observed SM prevalence was 43.9% (458/1043; 95% confidence interval 40.9%, 46.9%) within the migraine-only population. The 2022 clinic-observed SM incidence in patients with migraine was 24.2% (187/772; 95% confidence interval 21.3%, 27.4%). The median midpoint SM severity was 8.0/10.0 (IQR 7.0-9.0) with median SM attack duration of 10.0 days (IQR 4.0-30.0, range 3.0-330.0 days). SM treatments included: 48.3% (175/362) migraine-specific, 40.1% (145/362) NSAIDs, 37.8% (137/362) steroids, 21.3% (77/362) anti-dopaminergic drugs, 18.8% (68/362) nerve blocks, 23.2% (84/362) new preventive, 4.4% (16/362) opioids, and 1.7% (6/362) butalbital-containing medications. There were 17.7% (64/361) with a recorded emergency department visit and 6.4% (23/360) with a recorded admission for the SM episode.

Conclusion: SM is common in a tertiary headache population, affecting nearly half of specialty clinic patients with migraine over their lifetime and one in five in a single year. In this population, patients with SM tend to have chronic migraine with high rates of aura. This study highlights the need for improved diagnostic consistency and treatment.

目的:评估三级头痛门诊患者偏头痛状态(SM)的流行病学和特征,以确定SM的患病率、1年发病率、发作特征、治疗和医疗保健利用。背景:根据国际头痛疾病分类第三版,SM是一种持续至少72小时的衰弱性偏头痛发作。SM还没有很好地表征。方法:这项回顾性观察队列研究评估了亚利桑那州亚专科头痛中心的SM,使用了2022年患者电子健康记录的图表回顾。主要终点是临床观察的SM终生患病率和1年发病率(2022年1月1日至12月31日)。次要结果评估了SM攻击的临床特征和治疗方法,使用来自电子健康记录中足够详细信息的描述性统计数据。结果:2022年共筛查1184例患者;其中1043例(88.1%)被诊断为偏头痛,包括458例SM患者,其中373例符合纳入标准。中位年龄为47.0岁(四分位数间距[IQR] 38.0, 57.0),女性占87.7%(327/373)。大多数人患有慢性偏头痛,近一半的人报告有先兆病史。在只有偏头痛的人群中,临床观察到的SM患病率为43.9%(458/1043;95%可信区间为40.9%,46.9%)。2022年临床观察偏头痛患者SM发病率为24.2%(187/772;95%可信区间21.3%,27.4%)。SM严重程度中位数为8.0/10.0 (IQR 7.0-9.0), SM攻击持续时间中位数为10.0天(IQR 4.0-30.0,范围3.0-330.0天)。SM治疗包括:偏头痛特异性药物48.3%(175/362)、非甾体抗炎药40.1%(145/362)、类固醇37.8%(137/362)、抗多巴胺能药物21.3%(77/362)、神经阻滞18.8%(68/362)、新型预防药物23.2%(84/362)、阿片类药物4.4%(16/362)、布他比妥类药物1.7%(6/362)。17.7%(64/361)的患者有急诊就诊记录,6.4%(23/360)的患者有SM发作入院记录。结论:SM在三期头痛人群中很常见,影响了近一半的专科临床偏头痛患者的一生,五分之一的患者在一年中受到影响。在这个人群中,SM患者往往有高先兆率的慢性偏头痛。这项研究强调了提高诊断一致性和治疗的必要性。
{"title":"Epidemiology and characteristics of status migrainosus in a tertiary headache clinic: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Evelyn Dorsey, Jennifer Robblee","doi":"10.1111/head.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the epidemiology and characteristics of status migrainosus (SM) in a cohort of patients from a tertiary care headache clinic to identify the prevalence, 1-year incidence, attack features, treatments, and healthcare utilization for SM.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>SM is a debilitating migraine attack lasting at least 72 h according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. SM has not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated SM in a subspecialty headache center in Arizona using chart review from electronic health records for patients seen in 2022. The primary endpoints were clinic-observed lifetime prevalence and 1-year incidence (January 1 to December 31, 2022) of SM. Secondary outcomes assessed the clinical features and treatments tried for the SM attacks using descriptive statistics from those with sufficient detail available in electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1184 patients seen in 2022 were screened; of those, 1043 (88.1%) had a diagnosis of migraine, including 458 patients with any lifetime episode of SM, with 373 meeting inclusion criteria. The median age was 47.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38.0, 57.0) and 87.7% were female (327/373). The majority had chronic migraine and nearly half reported a history of aura. The clinic-observed SM prevalence was 43.9% (458/1043; 95% confidence interval 40.9%, 46.9%) within the migraine-only population. The 2022 clinic-observed SM incidence in patients with migraine was 24.2% (187/772; 95% confidence interval 21.3%, 27.4%). The median midpoint SM severity was 8.0/10.0 (IQR 7.0-9.0) with median SM attack duration of 10.0 days (IQR 4.0-30.0, range 3.0-330.0 days). SM treatments included: 48.3% (175/362) migraine-specific, 40.1% (145/362) NSAIDs, 37.8% (137/362) steroids, 21.3% (77/362) anti-dopaminergic drugs, 18.8% (68/362) nerve blocks, 23.2% (84/362) new preventive, 4.4% (16/362) opioids, and 1.7% (6/362) butalbital-containing medications. There were 17.7% (64/361) with a recorded emergency department visit and 6.4% (23/360) with a recorded admission for the SM episode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SM is common in a tertiary headache population, affecting nearly half of specialty clinic patients with migraine over their lifetime and one in five in a single year. In this population, patients with SM tend to have chronic migraine with high rates of aura. This study highlights the need for improved diagnostic consistency and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147369476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel optimization of multi-mechanistic approaches for the acute treatment of a migraine attack: A review. 偏头痛发作急性治疗的多机制方法的新优化:综述。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI: 10.1111/head.70051
Stephen Silberstein, Alan M Rapoport

Objective: To highlight key factors required to optimize multi-mechanistic approaches with oral combination treatments for the acute management of a migraine attack.

Background: Given the complex multi-factorial nature of migraine, combining treatments with different mechanisms of action should improve outcomes compared to monotherapies, but this has not been demonstrated with all treatment combinations.

Methods: For this narrative review, we searched PubMed using combinations of these terms: migraine, acute treatment, combination therapy, fixed-dose combination therapy, multi-mechanistic treatment, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. All articles considered relevant were included.

Results: None of the existing migraine acute treatments as monotherapy effectively treat the key pathophysiological processes of migraine completely. Many patients do not achieve 2-h pain freedom, which is key to avoiding migraine recurrence, medication overuse leading to chronification, and migraine-related disability. The development of combination approaches has led to only two combinations with demonstrated superiority over their individual components: aspirin/acetaminophen/caffeine and sumatriptan/naproxen sodium. The latter is the most effective proven combination treatment because it targets peripheral activation of central pain pathways during the early migraine stages and central sensitization that develops later, independent of peripheral input. Other triptan/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug combinations with higher efficacy as monotherapies could be more effective than sumatriptan/naproxen sodium, particularly if their pharmacokinetic profiles align with the vasoactive mediators of peripheral and central sensitization that they target.

Conclusions: Combination treatments with different mechanisms of action targeting key distinct pathophysiological processes of migraine may be more effective than monotherapies, particularly if their pharmacokinetic profiles are optimized to target those processes at the right time. Further research in this area is warranted.

目的:强调优化多机制口服联合治疗急性偏头痛发作所需的关键因素。背景:考虑到偏头痛复杂的多因素性质,与单一治疗相比,结合不同作用机制的治疗应能改善结果,但这并没有在所有治疗组合中得到证实。方法:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们使用以下术语组合检索PubMed:偏头痛、急性治疗、联合治疗、固定剂量联合治疗、多机制治疗、药代动力学和药效学。所有被认为相关的文章都包括在内。结果:现有的偏头痛急性治疗方法均不能完全有效地治疗偏头痛的关键病理生理过程。许多患者无法实现2小时疼痛自由,这是避免偏头痛复发、药物过度使用导致慢性化和偏头痛相关残疾的关键。联合方法的发展导致只有两种组合比其单独成分具有优势:阿司匹林/对乙酰氨基酚/咖啡因和舒马普坦/萘普生钠。后者是最有效的已证实的联合治疗,因为它针对偏头痛早期中枢性疼痛通路的外周激活和后来发展的中枢性致敏,独立于外周输入。其他曲坦类/非甾体类抗炎药物联合使用作为单药治疗可能比苏马普坦/萘普生钠更有效,特别是如果它们的药代动力学特征与它们靶向的外周和中枢致敏的血管活性介质一致。结论:针对关键的不同病理生理过程的不同作用机制的联合治疗可能比单一治疗更有效,特别是如果它们的药代动力学特征被优化以在正确的时间靶向这些过程。这方面的进一步研究是有必要的。
{"title":"Novel optimization of multi-mechanistic approaches for the acute treatment of a migraine attack: A review.","authors":"Stephen Silberstein, Alan M Rapoport","doi":"10.1111/head.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To highlight key factors required to optimize multi-mechanistic approaches with oral combination treatments for the acute management of a migraine attack.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the complex multi-factorial nature of migraine, combining treatments with different mechanisms of action should improve outcomes compared to monotherapies, but this has not been demonstrated with all treatment combinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this narrative review, we searched PubMed using combinations of these terms: migraine, acute treatment, combination therapy, fixed-dose combination therapy, multi-mechanistic treatment, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. All articles considered relevant were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the existing migraine acute treatments as monotherapy effectively treat the key pathophysiological processes of migraine completely. Many patients do not achieve 2-h pain freedom, which is key to avoiding migraine recurrence, medication overuse leading to chronification, and migraine-related disability. The development of combination approaches has led to only two combinations with demonstrated superiority over their individual components: aspirin/acetaminophen/caffeine and sumatriptan/naproxen sodium. The latter is the most effective proven combination treatment because it targets peripheral activation of central pain pathways during the early migraine stages and central sensitization that develops later, independent of peripheral input. Other triptan/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug combinations with higher efficacy as monotherapies could be more effective than sumatriptan/naproxen sodium, particularly if their pharmacokinetic profiles align with the vasoactive mediators of peripheral and central sensitization that they target.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination treatments with different mechanisms of action targeting key distinct pathophysiological processes of migraine may be more effective than monotherapies, particularly if their pharmacokinetic profiles are optimized to target those processes at the right time. Further research in this area is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Headache
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1