Giulia Silvestri, Luca Roccatagliata, Francesco Tazza, Simona Schiavi, Alberto Coccia, Monica Bandettini Di Poggio, Maria Cellerino, Alessio Signori, Cinzia Finocchi, Antonio Uccelli, Matilde Inglese, Caterina Lapucci
Objective: To investigate, in two cohorts including patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and migraine, (i) the prevalence of the "central vein sign" (CVS), (ii) the spatial distribution of positive CVS (CVS+) lesions, (iii) the threshold of CVS+ lesions able to distinguish MS from migraine with high sensitivity and specificity.
Methods: A total of 70 patients with MS/clinically isolated syndrome and 50 age- and sex-matched patients with migraine underwent a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging scan. The CVS was evaluated according to current guidelines, excluding eight patients with migraine who did not show white matter (WM) lesions. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the best threshold in terms of proportion of CVS+ lesions and the absolute number of CVS+ lesions able to differentiate MS from migraine.
Results: Lesion volume was different between CVS+ and CVS negative lesions (median 1043 vs. 176.5 mm3 for MS cohort; median 35.1 vs. 52.2 mm3 for migraine cohort; p < 0.001 for all). A higher proportion of CVS+ lesions was associated with a higher probability of being diagnosed as MS (adjusted odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.14; p < 0.001). CVS+ lesion volume and number were higher in MS with respect to migraine, both considering the whole brain and its subregions (p < 0.001). The proportion of CVS+ lesions in juxtacortical and infratentorial areas was higher in MS than in migraine (p = 0.015 and p = 0.034, respectively). The best CVS proportion-based threshold able to differentiate MS from migraine was 35.0% (sensitivity 97.1%, specificity 85.7%) with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00). The "select 6" rule seemed to be preferable in terms of specificity with respect to the "select 3" rule.
Conclusions: A CVS proportion-based threshold of 35.0% is capable of distinguishing MS from migraine with high sensitivity and specificity. The "select 6" algorithm may be useful in the clinical setting.
{"title":"The \"central vein sign\" to differentiate multiple sclerosis from migraine.","authors":"Giulia Silvestri, Luca Roccatagliata, Francesco Tazza, Simona Schiavi, Alberto Coccia, Monica Bandettini Di Poggio, Maria Cellerino, Alessio Signori, Cinzia Finocchi, Antonio Uccelli, Matilde Inglese, Caterina Lapucci","doi":"10.1111/head.14902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14902","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate, in two cohorts including patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and migraine, (i) the prevalence of the \"central vein sign\" (CVS), (ii) the spatial distribution of positive CVS (CVS+) lesions, (iii) the threshold of CVS+ lesions able to distinguish MS from migraine with high sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients with MS/clinically isolated syndrome and 50 age- and sex-matched patients with migraine underwent a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging scan. The CVS was evaluated according to current guidelines, excluding eight patients with migraine who did not show white matter (WM) lesions. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the best threshold in terms of proportion of CVS+ lesions and the absolute number of CVS+ lesions able to differentiate MS from migraine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesion volume was different between CVS+ and CVS negative lesions (median 1043 vs. 176.5 mm<sup>3</sup> for MS cohort; median 35.1 vs. 52.2 mm<sup>3</sup> for migraine cohort; p < 0.001 for all). A higher proportion of CVS+ lesions was associated with a higher probability of being diagnosed as MS (adjusted odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.14; p < 0.001). CVS+ lesion volume and number were higher in MS with respect to migraine, both considering the whole brain and its subregions (p < 0.001). The proportion of CVS+ lesions in juxtacortical and infratentorial areas was higher in MS than in migraine (p = 0.015 and p = 0.034, respectively). The best CVS proportion-based threshold able to differentiate MS from migraine was 35.0% (sensitivity 97.1%, specificity 85.7%) with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00). The \"select 6\" rule seemed to be preferable in terms of specificity with respect to the \"select 3\" rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CVS proportion-based threshold of 35.0% is capable of distinguishing MS from migraine with high sensitivity and specificity. The \"select 6\" algorithm may be useful in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaiden Jobin, Ashley Smith, Christina Campbell, Siobhan M Schabrun, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Kathryn J Schneider, Chantel T Debert
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headache. Our exploratory objectives compared symptoms of headache, mood, pain, and quality of life between active and sham transcranial direct stimulation combined with exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervicogenic headache arises from injury to the cervical spine or degenerative diseases impacting cervical spine structure resulting in pain, reduced quality of life, and impaired function. Current standard-of-care treatments such as radiofrequency ablation, pharmacotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise therapy lack efficacy for some patients. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a neuromodulation technique that has shown promise in treating chronic pain conditions by positively altering neuronal activity but has not been evaluated as treatment for cervicogenic headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, feasibility trial recruited 32 participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years that met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition criteria for cervicogenic headache. Participants were randomized to receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation both combined with daily exercise therapy over 6 weeks. Transcranial direct current stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to worse pain for 20 min at 2 mA with a 30 s ramp up/down period. Recruitment, retention, and adherence were evaluated for feasibility. Safety was assessed through serious and minor adverse events and an adverse effect questionnaire. Clinical outcome measures assessed headache, pain, quality of life, and mood symptoms at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-weeks post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 participants were contacted to participate with 32 recruited, 16 randomized into each group, and 14 completing the treatment protocol in both groups. Within each group 12 (active) and nine (sham) completed treatment within the proposed 6 weeks (three sessions per week), others received 18 sessions but took longer. Exercise therapy was completed on an average of 87% of days for both groups. Transcranial direct current stimulation was safe, with no serious adverse events and one minor adverse event in the active group. Itching was a more common post-intervention complaint in the active group (64% active vs. 43% sham). Exploratory analysis revealed significant group × time interactions for average headache pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.012, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.751 to -0.273; p = 0.008), 6-weeks (β = -1.370, 95% CI -2.109 to -0.631; p < 0.001), and 12-weeks (β = -1.842, 95% CI -2.600 to -1.085; p < 0.001) post-treatment, and for neck pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.184, 95% CI -2.076
{"title":"The safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation and exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headaches: A randomized pilot trial.","authors":"Kaiden Jobin, Ashley Smith, Christina Campbell, Siobhan M Schabrun, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Kathryn J Schneider, Chantel T Debert","doi":"10.1111/head.14887","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headache. Our exploratory objectives compared symptoms of headache, mood, pain, and quality of life between active and sham transcranial direct stimulation combined with exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervicogenic headache arises from injury to the cervical spine or degenerative diseases impacting cervical spine structure resulting in pain, reduced quality of life, and impaired function. Current standard-of-care treatments such as radiofrequency ablation, pharmacotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise therapy lack efficacy for some patients. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a neuromodulation technique that has shown promise in treating chronic pain conditions by positively altering neuronal activity but has not been evaluated as treatment for cervicogenic headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, feasibility trial recruited 32 participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years that met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition criteria for cervicogenic headache. Participants were randomized to receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation both combined with daily exercise therapy over 6 weeks. Transcranial direct current stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to worse pain for 20 min at 2 mA with a 30 s ramp up/down period. Recruitment, retention, and adherence were evaluated for feasibility. Safety was assessed through serious and minor adverse events and an adverse effect questionnaire. Clinical outcome measures assessed headache, pain, quality of life, and mood symptoms at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-weeks post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 participants were contacted to participate with 32 recruited, 16 randomized into each group, and 14 completing the treatment protocol in both groups. Within each group 12 (active) and nine (sham) completed treatment within the proposed 6 weeks (three sessions per week), others received 18 sessions but took longer. Exercise therapy was completed on an average of 87% of days for both groups. Transcranial direct current stimulation was safe, with no serious adverse events and one minor adverse event in the active group. Itching was a more common post-intervention complaint in the active group (64% active vs. 43% sham). Exploratory analysis revealed significant group × time interactions for average headache pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.012, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.751 to -0.273; p = 0.008), 6-weeks (β = -1.370, 95% CI -2.109 to -0.631; p < 0.001), and 12-weeks (β = -1.842, 95% CI -2.600 to -1.085; p < 0.001) post-treatment, and for neck pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.184, 95% CI -2.076 ","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina Romozzi, Antonio Munafò, Andrea Burgalassi, Francesco De Cesaris, Giulia Vigani, Claudia Altamura, Veronica Rivi, Simona Guerzoni, Paolo Calabresi, Bianca Raffaelli, Luigi Francesco Iannone
Antibodies targeting either the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, or the receptor (erenumab) have been approved for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Although widely used and generally effective, a proportion of patients discontinue treatment due to lack of efficacy. In both randomized controlled trials and observational studies, all anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have consistently demonstrated comparable efficacy and tolerability, suggesting a pharmacological class effect. However, differences in therapeutic targets, structure, and pharmacokinetic characteristics may influence their efficacy and safety differently. Therefore, in patients not achieving a clinically meaningful response with one anti-CGRP antibody, switching to a different antibody may be a viable option. This review examines the pharmacological characteristics and distinctions among anti-CGRP mAbs, highlighting their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, along with the clinical observational data of switching. Finally, we summarize suggestions from international guidelines.
{"title":"Pharmacological differences and switching among anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A narrative review.","authors":"Marina Romozzi, Antonio Munafò, Andrea Burgalassi, Francesco De Cesaris, Giulia Vigani, Claudia Altamura, Veronica Rivi, Simona Guerzoni, Paolo Calabresi, Bianca Raffaelli, Luigi Francesco Iannone","doi":"10.1111/head.14903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibodies targeting either the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, or the receptor (erenumab) have been approved for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Although widely used and generally effective, a proportion of patients discontinue treatment due to lack of efficacy. In both randomized controlled trials and observational studies, all anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have consistently demonstrated comparable efficacy and tolerability, suggesting a pharmacological class effect. However, differences in therapeutic targets, structure, and pharmacokinetic characteristics may influence their efficacy and safety differently. Therefore, in patients not achieving a clinically meaningful response with one anti-CGRP antibody, switching to a different antibody may be a viable option. This review examines the pharmacological characteristics and distinctions among anti-CGRP mAbs, highlighting their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, along with the clinical observational data of switching. Finally, we summarize suggestions from international guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143004122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate whether patients with tension-type headache (TTH) exhibit abnormal brain functional connectivity compared to healthy controls.
Background: TTH is one of the most prevalent headache disorders throughout the world. The present study delves into brain functional connectivity in patients with TTH to enhance the understanding of its underlying pathophysiology.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling patients with TTH diagnosed in line with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition beta criteria and a cohort of healthy controls (HCs). We used four metrics-global brain functional connectivity, functional connectivity, Granger causality analysis, and dynamic functional connectivity-to evaluate alterations of functional connectivity patterns in patients with TTH from both static and dynamic perspectives. Furthermore, correlational analyses were performed to explore the relationships between abnormal brain activities and clinical characteristics.
Results: A total of 33 patients with TTH (mean age = 42.3; 13 males/20 females) and 30 HCs (mean age = 37.1; 13 males/17 females) were included in the current study. Compared to HCs, patients with TTH showed altered global brain functional connectivity in the right dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (SFGdor, t = 4.60). Abnormal functional connectivity was also detected between the right SFGdor and the right superior temporal gyrus (t = 4.56). Furthermore, the right SFGdor exhibited altered information flow with several brain regions, including the left precuneus (t = 5.16), right middle temporal gyrus (MTG, t = 4.72/-4.41), right inferior temporal gyrus (t = 4.64), right caudate nucleus (t = 4.09), and right thalamus (THA, t = -4.04). In terms of dynamic functional connectivity, disconnection was observed between the right SFGdor and the right MTG (t = -3.10), right Rolandic operculum (ROL, t = 3.60), left opercular inferior frontal gyrus (t = -3.48), and left medial superior frontal gyrus (t = -3.00). In addition, the correlation analyses revealed that activities in the MTG (r = 0.48), THA (r = -0.38), and ROL (r = 0.36) were significantly correlated with disease duration, while THA activity was associated with Visual Analogue Scale scores (r = 0.50).
Conclusions: This study revealed alterations in both static and dynamic brain functional connectivity in patients with TTH within regions implicated in sensory perception, emotional processing, cognition, and pain regulation. These results may promote the understanding of the neural networks involved in TTH and potentially inform future therapeutic approaches for the condition.
{"title":"Altered brain functional connectivity in patients with tension-type headache.","authors":"Mengqi Zhao, Lanfen Chen, Zhixiang Cheng, Xizhen Wang, Shuxian Zhang, Mengting Li, Zeqi Hao, Xihe Sun, Jianxin Zhang, Yang Yu, Jun Ren, Xize Jia","doi":"10.1111/head.14900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether patients with tension-type headache (TTH) exhibit abnormal brain functional connectivity compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>TTH is one of the most prevalent headache disorders throughout the world. The present study delves into brain functional connectivity in patients with TTH to enhance the understanding of its underlying pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling patients with TTH diagnosed in line with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition beta criteria and a cohort of healthy controls (HCs). We used four metrics-global brain functional connectivity, functional connectivity, Granger causality analysis, and dynamic functional connectivity-to evaluate alterations of functional connectivity patterns in patients with TTH from both static and dynamic perspectives. Furthermore, correlational analyses were performed to explore the relationships between abnormal brain activities and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 patients with TTH (mean age = 42.3; 13 males/20 females) and 30 HCs (mean age = 37.1; 13 males/17 females) were included in the current study. Compared to HCs, patients with TTH showed altered global brain functional connectivity in the right dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (SFGdor, t = 4.60). Abnormal functional connectivity was also detected between the right SFGdor and the right superior temporal gyrus (t = 4.56). Furthermore, the right SFGdor exhibited altered information flow with several brain regions, including the left precuneus (t = 5.16), right middle temporal gyrus (MTG, t = 4.72/-4.41), right inferior temporal gyrus (t = 4.64), right caudate nucleus (t = 4.09), and right thalamus (THA, t = -4.04). In terms of dynamic functional connectivity, disconnection was observed between the right SFGdor and the right MTG (t = -3.10), right Rolandic operculum (ROL, t = 3.60), left opercular inferior frontal gyrus (t = -3.48), and left medial superior frontal gyrus (t = -3.00). In addition, the correlation analyses revealed that activities in the MTG (r = 0.48), THA (r = -0.38), and ROL (r = 0.36) were significantly correlated with disease duration, while THA activity was associated with Visual Analogue Scale scores (r = 0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed alterations in both static and dynamic brain functional connectivity in patients with TTH within regions implicated in sensory perception, emotional processing, cognition, and pain regulation. These results may promote the understanding of the neural networks involved in TTH and potentially inform future therapeutic approaches for the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina Haro, Gabriel Gárate, José Luis Hernández, José Manuel Olmos, María Muñoz, Vicente González-Quintanilla, Julio Pascual
Background: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations have been shown to be low in patients with migraine, but results are controversial regarding the current role of vitamin D in migraine severity. Using a case-control design, we aimed to evaluate serum 25(OH)D levels in a group of females with high-frequency episodic migraine/chronic migraine (HF/CM) and analyze its association with headache frequency and serum calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels.
Methods: Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured in 97 females with HF/CM (age 48.9 ± 9.4 years) and 146 healthy females (47.4 ± 8.1 years). Participants taking vitamin D supplements were excluded. Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D were determined by electrochemiluminescence (Roche, Germany), and CGRP levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Abbexa, UK).
Results: Mean 25(OH)D levels in females with HF/CM (median [interquartile range] 19.0 [13.0-24.5] ng/mL) were below the values considered for insufficiency or deficiency and significantly lower than controls (25.0 [19-29.8] ng/mL; p < 0.0001). Fifty (51.5%) patients with HF/CM had levels below 20 ng/mL. There was no significant association between vitamin D levels and monthly headache days (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [rho]: -0.086; p = 0.404) or with serum α (rho: 0.114; p = 0.267) and β-CGRP (rho: 0.113; p = 0.276) levels. Serum 25(OH)D levels in females with HF/CM with a minimum daily sunlight exposure were significantly higher than those without (23.0 [15.0-26.0] ng/mL vs. 14.0 [10.0-20.0] ng/mL; p < 0.001). Females with HF/CM who performed exercise had higher, albeit not significant, plasma 25(OH)D levels than those who did not (21.0 [15.5-28.0] ng/mL vs. 16.5 [12.0-24.0] ng/mL; p = 0.059).
Conclusions: Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D were low in many patients with HF/CM. Because there was no correlation with migraine frequency or serum CGRP levels, this deficiency seems to be a direct consequence of the migraine impact. Our data do not support either a relationship of 25(OH)D levels with migraine severity or the use of vitamin D supplements as a specific migraine treatment, although further studies are needed.
{"title":"Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in migraine are not related to headache frequency: A case-control study in patients with high-frequency/chronic migraine.","authors":"Marina Haro, Gabriel Gárate, José Luis Hernández, José Manuel Olmos, María Muñoz, Vicente González-Quintanilla, Julio Pascual","doi":"10.1111/head.14901","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14901","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations have been shown to be low in patients with migraine, but results are controversial regarding the current role of vitamin D in migraine severity. Using a case-control design, we aimed to evaluate serum 25(OH)D levels in a group of females with high-frequency episodic migraine/chronic migraine (HF/CM) and analyze its association with headache frequency and serum calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured in 97 females with HF/CM (age 48.9 ± 9.4 years) and 146 healthy females (47.4 ± 8.1 years). Participants taking vitamin D supplements were excluded. Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D were determined by electrochemiluminescence (Roche, Germany), and CGRP levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Abbexa, UK).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean 25(OH)D levels in females with HF/CM (median [interquartile range] 19.0 [13.0-24.5] ng/mL) were below the values considered for insufficiency or deficiency and significantly lower than controls (25.0 [19-29.8] ng/mL; p < 0.0001). Fifty (51.5%) patients with HF/CM had levels below 20 ng/mL. There was no significant association between vitamin D levels and monthly headache days (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [rho]: -0.086; p = 0.404) or with serum α (rho: 0.114; p = 0.267) and β-CGRP (rho: 0.113; p = 0.276) levels. Serum 25(OH)D levels in females with HF/CM with a minimum daily sunlight exposure were significantly higher than those without (23.0 [15.0-26.0] ng/mL vs. 14.0 [10.0-20.0] ng/mL; p < 0.001). Females with HF/CM who performed exercise had higher, albeit not significant, plasma 25(OH)D levels than those who did not (21.0 [15.5-28.0] ng/mL vs. 16.5 [12.0-24.0] ng/mL; p = 0.059).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D were low in many patients with HF/CM. Because there was no correlation with migraine frequency or serum CGRP levels, this deficiency seems to be a direct consequence of the migraine impact. Our data do not support either a relationship of 25(OH)D levels with migraine severity or the use of vitamin D supplements as a specific migraine treatment, although further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H Shafeeq Ahmed, Purva Reddy Jayaram, Sukriti Khar
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the existing evidence on Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS) in the pediatric population, focusing on clinical features, diagnostic challenges, treatment outcomes, and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is a rare headache disorder caused by idiopathic inflammation of the cavernous sinus, orbital apex, or orbit, resulting in neuro-ophthalmological manifestations. It is uniquely characterized by cranial nerve palsies and often responds well to steroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using three databases along with the gray literature. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the review protocol was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024576802). The review included case reports and case series published in multiple languages that documented pediatric or adolescent cases of THS. We excluded any cases that were irrelevant, had insufficient details, were unsure of the diagnosis, or were later re-diagnosed with another condition. Data on clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial literature search provided 325 articles of which 55 articles discussing 61 unique pediatric patients were included. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 11 (8-15) years, with a female predominance (70% [43/61]). Common symptoms included unilateral headache (48% [29/61]), retro-orbital pain (56% [34/61]), and cranial nerve palsies, predominantly involving the oculomotor nerve (66% [40/61]). The median (IQR) duration of symptoms was 14.5 (5-35) days. Imaging often revealed contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging with cavernous sinus/orbital apex lesions. Steroid therapy was the mainstay of treatment, with 91% (52/57) of patients receiving corticosteroids. High-dose steroids ranged from 500-1000 mg/day, with some cases requiring combined therapy (typically intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone) and subsequent tapering. A few patients (5% [3/61]) experienced spontaneous improvement without steroids. Recurrence was noted in 33% (20/61) of patients, often necessitating prolonged or repeated corticosteroid therapy, and some cases required additional immunosuppressive therapies (infliximab/adalimumab) for management. The median (IQR) time to symptom resolution was 14 (4.5-38.5) days, while the median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 730 (195-1095) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tolosa-Hunt syndrome in children presents significant diagnostic and management challenges due to the complexity of symptoms and the rarity of the condition. Accurate diagnosis and prompt steroid therapy are crucial after ruling out other causes, althou
{"title":"Tolosa-Hunt syndrome in children and adolescents: A systematic review.","authors":"H Shafeeq Ahmed, Purva Reddy Jayaram, Sukriti Khar","doi":"10.1111/head.14890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the existing evidence on Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS) in the pediatric population, focusing on clinical features, diagnostic challenges, treatment outcomes, and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is a rare headache disorder caused by idiopathic inflammation of the cavernous sinus, orbital apex, or orbit, resulting in neuro-ophthalmological manifestations. It is uniquely characterized by cranial nerve palsies and often responds well to steroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using three databases along with the gray literature. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the review protocol was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024576802). The review included case reports and case series published in multiple languages that documented pediatric or adolescent cases of THS. We excluded any cases that were irrelevant, had insufficient details, were unsure of the diagnosis, or were later re-diagnosed with another condition. Data on clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial literature search provided 325 articles of which 55 articles discussing 61 unique pediatric patients were included. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 11 (8-15) years, with a female predominance (70% [43/61]). Common symptoms included unilateral headache (48% [29/61]), retro-orbital pain (56% [34/61]), and cranial nerve palsies, predominantly involving the oculomotor nerve (66% [40/61]). The median (IQR) duration of symptoms was 14.5 (5-35) days. Imaging often revealed contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging with cavernous sinus/orbital apex lesions. Steroid therapy was the mainstay of treatment, with 91% (52/57) of patients receiving corticosteroids. High-dose steroids ranged from 500-1000 mg/day, with some cases requiring combined therapy (typically intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone) and subsequent tapering. A few patients (5% [3/61]) experienced spontaneous improvement without steroids. Recurrence was noted in 33% (20/61) of patients, often necessitating prolonged or repeated corticosteroid therapy, and some cases required additional immunosuppressive therapies (infliximab/adalimumab) for management. The median (IQR) time to symptom resolution was 14 (4.5-38.5) days, while the median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 730 (195-1095) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tolosa-Hunt syndrome in children presents significant diagnostic and management challenges due to the complexity of symptoms and the rarity of the condition. Accurate diagnosis and prompt steroid therapy are crucial after ruling out other causes, althou","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1111/head.14808
Ghader Mohammadnezhad, Farhad Assarzadegan, Mohsen Koosha, Hadi Esmaily
Objective: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.
Background: Chronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test-6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).
Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test-6 in the EPA and placebo groups was -6.96 (3.34) and -4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) -9.76 (4.15) and -4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: -0.76 [1.13] and -0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.
Conclusions: This study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.
{"title":"Eicosapentaenoic acid versus placebo as adjunctive therapy in chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ghader Mohammadnezhad, Farhad Assarzadegan, Mohsen Koosha, Hadi Esmaily","doi":"10.1111/head.14808","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.14808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test-6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test-6 in the EPA and placebo groups was -6.96 (3.34) and -4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) -9.76 (4.15) and -4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: -0.76 [1.13] and -0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"153-163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142106740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1111/head.14822
Jae Rok Kim, Tae Jin Park, Maria Agapova, Andrew Blumenfeld, Jonathan H Smith, Darshini Shah, Beth Devine
Objective: To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.
Background: Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "misdiagnosed cohort." Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "correctly diagnosed cohort." Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.
Results: A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.
Conclusion: Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.
目的:比较有或无误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源利用率和医疗费用:比较有或无误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源利用率和医疗成本:背景:尽管偏头痛的发病率很高,但偏头痛经常被误诊。背景:尽管偏头痛的发病率很高,但偏头痛经常被误诊,误诊造成的医疗资源使用和成本负担尚不清楚:这项回顾性队列研究从 Merative™ Marketscan® 商业数据库和医疗保险补充数据库中找出了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年期间被诊断为偏头痛的成年人。在确诊偏头痛之前曾被诊断为常见误诊(头痛、鼻窦炎或颈椎疼痛)的患者被归入 "误诊队列"。误诊队列中的患者有可能被误诊,但最终得到了正确的诊断。在确诊偏头痛之前没有通常认为的误诊史的患者被归入 "正确诊断队列"。我们对偏头痛确诊前的医疗资源利用率和医疗成本进行了评估,并对两组患者进行了比较。结果以每名患者每月为单位进行报告,并与发病率比率进行比较:符合纳入标准的正确诊断队列共有 29147 名患者,误诊队列共有 3841 名患者。误诊患者的住院率(0.02 vs. 0.01,发病率比 [IRR] 1.61,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.47-1.74)、急诊就诊率(0.10 vs. 0.05;IRR 1.89,95% CI 1.与诊断正确的患者相比,误诊患者在急诊就诊次数(0.10 vs. 0.05;IRR 1.89,95% CI 1.79-1.99)、神经科就诊次数(0.12 vs. 0.02;IRR 5.95,95% CI 5.40-6.57)、非神经科门诊就诊次数(2.64 vs. 1.58;IRR 1.67,95% CI 1.62-1.72)和处方开具次数(2.82 vs. 1.84;IRR 1.53,95% CI 1.48-1.58)方面均高于诊断错误的患者。误诊患者在住院(1362 美元对 518 美元;IRR 为 2.62,95% CI 为 2.50-2.75)、急诊就诊(222 美元对 98 美元;IRR 为 2.27,95% CI 为 2.18-2.36)、神经科医生就诊(222 美元对 98 美元;IRR 为 2.27,95% CI 为 2.18-2.36)等方面的医疗费用累积率明显更高。结论:与诊断正确的患者相比,有偏头痛病史的偏头痛患者在治疗过程中可能会面临更多的风险:结论:与无误诊史的偏头痛患者相比,有误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源使用率和成本增加率更高。
{"title":"Healthcare resource use and costs associated with the misdiagnosis of migraine.","authors":"Jae Rok Kim, Tae Jin Park, Maria Agapova, Andrew Blumenfeld, Jonathan H Smith, Darshini Shah, Beth Devine","doi":"10.1111/head.14822","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.14822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \"misdiagnosed cohort.\" Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \"correctly diagnosed cohort.\" Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-04DOI: 10.1111/head.14801
Mia T Minen, Christopher Whetten, Danielle Messier, Sheena Mehta, Anne Williamson, Allison Verhaak, Brian Grosberg
Objective: The objective of this pilot study was to assess physical therapists' (PTs) knowledge and needs regarding headache diagnosis and management.
Background: While there is significant research on physical therapy and cervicogenic headache, studies suggest that migraine is often under-recognized, misdiagnosed, and inadequately treated across society despite its high prevalence and burden. Because migraine commonly includes concurrent neck pain and/or vestibular symptoms, patients with migraine may present to PTs for treatment. Very little is known about PTs' headache and migraine education, knowledge, and clinical practices.
Methods: A team of headache specialists and PTs adapted a previously used headache knowledge and needs assessment survey to help ascertain PTs' knowledge and needs regarding headache treatment. The cross-sectional survey was distributed online via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to PTs within a large healthcare system in Connecticut.
Results: An estimated 50.5% (101/200) of PTs invited to complete the survey did so. Only 37.6% (38/101) of respondents reported receiving any formal headache or migraine education in their professional training, leading to knowledge gaps in differentiating and responding to headache subtypes. Only 45.5% (46/101) were able to identify that migraine is characterized by greater pain intensity than tension-type headache, and 22.8% (23/101) reported not knowing the duration of untreated migraine. When asked about the aspects of care they believe their patients with headache would like to see improved, PTs reported education around prevention and appropriate medication use (61/100 [61.0%]), provider awareness of the degree of disability associated with migraine (51/100 [51.0%]), and diagnostics (47/100 [47.0%]).
Conclusion: This sample of PTs from one healthcare system demonstrates knowledge gaps and variations in clinical practice for managing their patients with headache. Future research on integrating additional opportunities for headache education for physical therapists, including evidence-based behavioral therapies, is needed to ascertain whether it is likely to improve patient care.
{"title":"Headache diagnosis and treatment: A pilot knowledge and needs assessment among physical therapists.","authors":"Mia T Minen, Christopher Whetten, Danielle Messier, Sheena Mehta, Anne Williamson, Allison Verhaak, Brian Grosberg","doi":"10.1111/head.14801","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.14801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this pilot study was to assess physical therapists' (PTs) knowledge and needs regarding headache diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>While there is significant research on physical therapy and cervicogenic headache, studies suggest that migraine is often under-recognized, misdiagnosed, and inadequately treated across society despite its high prevalence and burden. Because migraine commonly includes concurrent neck pain and/or vestibular symptoms, patients with migraine may present to PTs for treatment. Very little is known about PTs' headache and migraine education, knowledge, and clinical practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of headache specialists and PTs adapted a previously used headache knowledge and needs assessment survey to help ascertain PTs' knowledge and needs regarding headache treatment. The cross-sectional survey was distributed online via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to PTs within a large healthcare system in Connecticut.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 50.5% (101/200) of PTs invited to complete the survey did so. Only 37.6% (38/101) of respondents reported receiving any formal headache or migraine education in their professional training, leading to knowledge gaps in differentiating and responding to headache subtypes. Only 45.5% (46/101) were able to identify that migraine is characterized by greater pain intensity than tension-type headache, and 22.8% (23/101) reported not knowing the duration of untreated migraine. When asked about the aspects of care they believe their patients with headache would like to see improved, PTs reported education around prevention and appropriate medication use (61/100 [61.0%]), provider awareness of the degree of disability associated with migraine (51/100 [51.0%]), and diagnostics (47/100 [47.0%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This sample of PTs from one healthcare system demonstrates knowledge gaps and variations in clinical practice for managing their patients with headache. Future research on integrating additional opportunities for headache education for physical therapists, including evidence-based behavioral therapies, is needed to ascertain whether it is likely to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"90-100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1111/head.14784
Inga Zalia Tummoszeit, Isa Amalie Olofsson, Mona Ameri Chalmer, Alexander Pil Henriksen, Bitten Aagaard, Søren Brunak, Mie Topholm Bruun, Maria Didriksen, Christian Erikstrup, Henrik Hjalgrim, Christina Mikkelsen, Susan Mikkelsen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Ole Birger Vesterager Pedersen, Liam Quinn, Erik Sørensen, Henrik Ullum, Jes Olesen, Karina Banasik, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Lisette J A Kogelman
Objective: To determine the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and migraine, migraine subtypes, and sex-specific factors.
Background: It has long been hypothesized that inflammation contributes to migraine pathophysiology. This study examined the association between migraine and alleles in the HLA system, a key player in immune response and genetic diversity.
Methods: We performed a case-control study and included 13,210 individuals with migraine and 86,738 controls. All participants were part of the Danish Blood Donor Study Genomic Cohort. Participants were genotyped and 111 HLA alleles on 15 HLA genes were imputed. We examined the association between HLA alleles and migraine subtypes, considering sex-specific differences.
Results: We found no association between HLA alleles and migraine, neither overall, nor in the sex-specific analysis. In the migraine subtype analysis, three HLA alleles were associated with migraine without aura; however, these associations could not be replicated in an independent Icelandic cohort (2191 individuals with migraine without aura and 278,858 controls). Furthermore, we found no association between HLA alleles and migraine with aura or chronic migraine.
Conclusion: We found no evidence of an association between the HLA system and migraine, suggesting that genetic factors related to the HLA system do not play a significant role in migraine susceptibility.
{"title":"No association between migraine and HLA alleles in a cohort of 13,210 individuals with migraine from the Danish Blood Donor Study.","authors":"Inga Zalia Tummoszeit, Isa Amalie Olofsson, Mona Ameri Chalmer, Alexander Pil Henriksen, Bitten Aagaard, Søren Brunak, Mie Topholm Bruun, Maria Didriksen, Christian Erikstrup, Henrik Hjalgrim, Christina Mikkelsen, Susan Mikkelsen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Ole Birger Vesterager Pedersen, Liam Quinn, Erik Sørensen, Henrik Ullum, Jes Olesen, Karina Banasik, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Lisette J A Kogelman","doi":"10.1111/head.14784","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.14784","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and migraine, migraine subtypes, and sex-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>It has long been hypothesized that inflammation contributes to migraine pathophysiology. This study examined the association between migraine and alleles in the HLA system, a key player in immune response and genetic diversity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a case-control study and included 13,210 individuals with migraine and 86,738 controls. All participants were part of the Danish Blood Donor Study Genomic Cohort. Participants were genotyped and 111 HLA alleles on 15 HLA genes were imputed. We examined the association between HLA alleles and migraine subtypes, considering sex-specific differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no association between HLA alleles and migraine, neither overall, nor in the sex-specific analysis. In the migraine subtype analysis, three HLA alleles were associated with migraine without aura; however, these associations could not be replicated in an independent Icelandic cohort (2191 individuals with migraine without aura and 278,858 controls). Furthermore, we found no association between HLA alleles and migraine with aura or chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence of an association between the HLA system and migraine, suggesting that genetic factors related to the HLA system do not play a significant role in migraine susceptibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}