First Psychometric Evaluation of the English Version of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1).

IF 2.8 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1080/00223891.2024.2365325

Kennedy M Balzen, Sophie Kerr, Tess Gecha, Joost Hutsebaut, Han Berghuis, Carla Sharp

{"title":"First Psychometric Evaluation of the English Version of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1).","authors":"Kennedy M Balzen, Sophie Kerr, Tess Gecha, Joost Hutsebaut, Han Berghuis, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2365325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders provides a dimensional framework for the conceptualization of personality disorders where Criterion A concerns the assessment of one's level of personality functioning (LPF). This study examines the psychometric properties of the English translation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1) to validate this translation for the assessment of LPF in English-speaking populations; and examine whether this measure increments self-report measures of LPF and personality pathology in predicting general functioning. The sample consisted of 129 emerging adults between 18 and 25 years of age (M = 20.54, SD = 2.08) from a mixed college and clinical sample. Results support a unidimensional factor structure of the STiP-5.1, good internal consistency, and high inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was supported through associations of the STiP-5.1 with self-report measures of LPF and personality pathology. The STiP-5.1 incremented self-report measures of personality pathology in predicting functional impairment, though additional variance explained was modest. Finally, STiP-5.1 scores differentiated individuals who obtained a score at or above the clinical cutoff from those below on self-report measures of personality pathology and LPF with large effect sizes. Findings support the validity of the English translation of the STiP-5.1 for the assessment of LPF.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2365325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders provides a dimensional framework for the conceptualization of personality disorders where Criterion A concerns the assessment of one's level of personality functioning (LPF). This study examines the psychometric properties of the English translation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1) to validate this translation for the assessment of LPF in English-speaking populations; and examine whether this measure increments self-report measures of LPF and personality pathology in predicting general functioning. The sample consisted of 129 emerging adults between 18 and 25 years of age (M = 20.54, SD = 2.08) from a mixed college and clinical sample. Results support a unidimensional factor structure of the STiP-5.1, good internal consistency, and high inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was supported through associations of the STiP-5.1 with self-report measures of LPF and personality pathology. The STiP-5.1 incremented self-report measures of personality pathology in predicting functional impairment, though additional variance explained was modest. Finally, STiP-5.1 scores differentiated individuals who obtained a score at or above the clinical cutoff from those below on self-report measures of personality pathology and LPF with large effect sizes. Findings support the validity of the English translation of the STiP-5.1 for the assessment of LPF.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

人格功能半结构化访谈（STiP-5.1）英文版的首次心理测量评估。

人格障碍替代模型为人格障碍的概念化提供了一个维度框架，其中标准 A 涉及对人格功能水平（LPF）的评估。本研究考察了人格功能半结构化访谈（STiP-5.1）英译本的心理测量学特性，以验证该译本在英语国家人群中的人格功能水平评估中的有效性；并考察该测量方法在预测一般功能方面是否能增强人格功能水平和人格病理学的自我报告测量。样本由 129 名年龄在 18 至 25 岁之间的新兴成年人组成（中位数 = 20.54，标差 = 2.08），他们来自大学和临床混合样本。结果表明，STiP-5.1 具有单维因子结构、良好的内部一致性和较高的评分者间可靠性。STiP-5.1与自我报告的LPF和人格病理学测量结果之间的关联支持了结构效度。STiP-5.1 在预测功能障碍方面增强了自我报告的人格病理学测量，尽管额外的解释方差不大。最后，STiP-5.1 的得分可以将那些在人格病理学和 LPF 自我报告测量中得分达到或超过临床临界值的人与低于临界值的人区分开来，并且具有较大的效应大小。研究结果表明，STiP-5.1 的英文译本在评估 LPF 方面是有效的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of personality assessment Multiple-

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

8.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.