首页 > 最新文献

Journal of personality assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) Trait Domains: Psychometric Properties and Cutoffs Based on General Population Norms. ICD-11 (PiCD)特征域的人格量表:基于一般人群规范的心理测量特性和截止点。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2026.2637560
Gunnar Valdemar Grunert, Bo Bach

The ICD-11 classification of Personality Disorder (PD) relies on global severity of personality dysfunction, while up to five trait domains can be specified as individual expressions (i.e. Negative affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia). The 60-item Personality inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) was developed to measure these domains but has not yet been evaluated in Scandinavian context. Using a representative and socio-demographically stratified sample of the Danish adult population (N = 714), this study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the PiCD and to provide normative data for clinical cutoffs and interpretation of scores. Results support a four-factor model, including a bipolar dimension of Disinhibition versus Anankastia, which is consistent with previous studies. The hierarchical structure from one global factor to the four specific factors also revealed a conceptually coherent pattern across all four levels. The PiCD domain scores show acceptable internal consistency and significant associations with psychosocial functioning (particularly for Negative affectivity and Detachment scores). The findings overall support the PiCD's utility in assessing ICD-11 trait domains and highlight the importance of representative normative data for clinical application in Scandinavian contexts. Normative data, tentative-cutoffs, and a scoring-key for a clinical interpretive report are provided to guide clinical interpretation and decision-making.

ICD-11的人格障碍(PD)分类依赖于人格功能障碍的整体严重程度,而多达五个特征域可以被指定为个体表达(即消极情感,超脱,分离,去抑制和难解症)。ICD-11 (PiCD)的60项人格量表是为了测量这些领域而开发的,但尚未在斯堪的纳维亚的背景下进行评估。本研究使用具有代表性和社会人口统计学分层的丹麦成年人口样本(N = 714),旨在调查PiCD的心理测量特性,并为临床截止点和分数解释提供规范性数据。结果支持一个四因素模型,包括去抑制与焦虑的双相维度,这与先前的研究一致。从一个全局因素到四个特定因素的层次结构也揭示了在所有四个层面上概念上连贯的模式。PiCD域得分显示出可接受的内部一致性和与社会心理功能的显著关联(特别是消极情感和超然得分)。研究结果总体上支持PiCD在评估ICD-11特征域方面的效用,并强调了斯堪的纳维亚地区临床应用代表性规范数据的重要性。提供了临床解释报告的规范性数据、暂定截止点和评分关键,以指导临床解释和决策。
{"title":"Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) Trait Domains: Psychometric Properties and Cutoffs Based on General Population Norms.","authors":"Gunnar Valdemar Grunert, Bo Bach","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2637560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2637560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ICD-11 classification of Personality Disorder (PD) relies on global severity of personality dysfunction, while up to five trait domains can be specified as individual expressions (i.e. Negative affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia). The 60-item Personality inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) was developed to measure these domains but has not yet been evaluated in Scandinavian context. Using a representative and socio-demographically stratified sample of the Danish adult population (<i>N</i> = 714), this study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the PiCD and to provide normative data for clinical cutoffs and interpretation of scores. Results support a four-factor model, including a bipolar dimension of Disinhibition versus Anankastia, which is consistent with previous studies. The hierarchical structure from one global factor to the four specific factors also revealed a conceptually coherent pattern across all four levels. The PiCD domain scores show acceptable internal consistency and significant associations with psychosocial functioning (particularly for Negative affectivity and Detachment scores). The findings overall support the PiCD's utility in assessing ICD-11 trait domains and highlight the importance of representative normative data for clinical application in Scandinavian contexts. Normative data, tentative-cutoffs, and a scoring-key for a clinical interpretive report are provided to guide clinical interpretation and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safeguarding Inference from Behavioral Inhibition and Activation System: A Call for Transparent Scoring and Reevaluation. 保护行为抑制和激活系统的推理:呼吁透明的评分和重新评估。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2026.2638972
Binyu Xiang, Chen Zhang, Qing Fan
{"title":"Safeguarding Inference from Behavioral Inhibition and Activation System: A Call for Transparent Scoring and Reevaluation.","authors":"Binyu Xiang, Chen Zhang, Qing Fan","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2638972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2638972","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147468407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Two-Factor Collaborative Structure of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale and Its Clinical Implications. 中国成人自我同情量表双因素协同结构的验证及其临床意义。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-13 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2026.2633781
Xucheng Guo, Yibing Wang, Qiuhan Wan, Mingjie Zhou

To advance culturally sensitive measurement, this study examined the structural universality and specificity of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-CA) in China. Data from Chinese adults (N = 1,638) completing the SCS-CA and Parental Burnout Assessment were analyzed using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM; testing eight competing models), bifactor indexes (assessing total score utility), exploratory graph analysis (EGA; mapping the network structure), and external validity tests. ESEM supported both six- and two-factor models, but the two-factor model (compassionate self-responding vs. uncompassionate self-responding) fit best. Bifactor indexes ruled out the use of a single total score. EGA confirmed a synergistic two-dimensional structure, identifying self-judgment as the central node and common humanity as the key bridge. The uncompassionate self-responding dimension also emerged as a significantly stronger predictor of parental burnout. The results establish a culturally specific, two-dimensional model of self-compassion for China, revealing distinct dynamics between its components and providing a foundation for tailored interventions and future research.

本研究旨在探讨中国成人自我同情量表(SCS-CA)在中国的结构普遍性和特异性。本研究采用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)、双因子指数(评估总分效用)、探索性图分析(EGA)和外部效度检验对1638名完成父母倦怠量表和父母倦怠量表的中国成年人的数据进行分析。ESEM同时支持六因素模型和两因素模型,但两因素模型(富有同情心的自我反应与无同情心的自我反应)最适合。双因素指数排除了单一总分的使用。EGA确认了一个协同的二维结构,以自我判断为中心节点,以共同人性为关键桥梁。无同情心的自我反应维度也成为父母倦怠的一个显著更强的预测因子。研究结果为中国建立了一个具有文化特异性的二维自我同情模型,揭示了其组成部分之间的独特动态,为量身定制的干预措施和未来的研究提供了基础。
{"title":"Validation of the Two-Factor Collaborative Structure of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale and Its Clinical Implications.","authors":"Xucheng Guo, Yibing Wang, Qiuhan Wan, Mingjie Zhou","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2633781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2633781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To advance culturally sensitive measurement, this study examined the structural universality and specificity of the Chinese Adult Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-CA) in China. Data from Chinese adults (<i>N</i> = 1,638) completing the SCS-CA and Parental Burnout Assessment were analyzed using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM; testing eight competing models), bifactor indexes (assessing total score utility), exploratory graph analysis (EGA; mapping the network structure), and external validity tests. ESEM supported both six- and two-factor models, but the two-factor model (compassionate self-responding vs. uncompassionate self-responding) fit best. Bifactor indexes ruled out the use of a single total score. EGA confirmed a synergistic two-dimensional structure, identifying self-judgment as the central node and common humanity as the key bridge. The uncompassionate self-responding dimension also emerged as a significantly stronger predictor of parental burnout. The results establish a culturally specific, two-dimensional model of self-compassion for China, revealing distinct dynamics between its components and providing a foundation for tailored interventions and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147458249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spirituality Beyond Religion: Development of 9-Item and 27-Item Multidimensional Measures of Spiritual Yearning. 超越宗教的灵性:9项与27项精神向往多维测度的发展。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2026.2630925
Joshua A Wilt, Daryl R Van Tongeren, Patty Van Cappellen, Julie J Exline

Emerging evidence suggests that nonreligious individuals may desire existential meaning and transcendent connection that extends beyond religious contexts. Personality psychology has long incorporated religion and spirituality, however, existing tools assess the presence of religious beliefs or general spirituality, and there is no validated measure to assess the motivational state that we term spiritual yearning. This study aimed to examine the structure of spiritual yearning and develop reliable measures. Across three studies of nonreligious adults (total N = 1,579), we conducted exploratory bifactor analysis and bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM). Results revealed a strong general factor of spiritual yearning, along with nine group factors reflecting distinct yearnings: moral guidance, divine relationship, afterlife beliefs, communal belonging, transcendent interconnectedness, inner peace, spiritual experiences, authentic self-discovery, and meaningful legacy. Based on these results, we created two scales: a 9-item general yearning measure and a 27-item version incorporating a general scale and nine three-item subscales. All measures showed strong psychometric properties and initial evidence of predictive validity. Correlations indicated that general yearning was meaningfully related to existential concerns such as meaning in life, religious quest orientation, and spiritual struggles, while subscales also revealed theoretically meaningful unique associations with specific domains of spiritual struggle.

新出现的证据表明,不信教的人可能渴望超越宗教背景的存在意义和超越的联系。人格心理学长期以来一直将宗教和灵性结合在一起,然而,现有的工具评估宗教信仰或一般灵性的存在,并且没有有效的方法来评估我们称之为精神渴望的动机状态。本研究旨在探讨精神向往的结构,并制定可靠的测量方法。在三项非宗教成年人的研究中(总N = 1,579),我们进行了探索性双因素分析和双因素探索性结构方程模型(B-ESEM)。结果显示,精神向往的总体因素较强,同时还有反映不同渴望的9个群体因素:道德指导、神性关系、来世信仰、共同归属、超越的相互联系、内心平静、精神体验、真实的自我发现和有意义的遗产。基于这些结果,我们创建了两个量表:一个包含9个条目的一般渴望量表和一个包含27个条目的一般渴望量表和9个包含3个条目的子量表。所有测量都显示出强烈的心理测量特性和预测效度的初步证据。相关性表明,总体渴望与生活意义、宗教追求取向和精神斗争等存在主义关注有意义相关,而子量表也揭示了与特定精神斗争领域有理论意义的独特关联。
{"title":"Spirituality Beyond Religion: Development of 9-Item and 27-Item Multidimensional Measures of Spiritual Yearning.","authors":"Joshua A Wilt, Daryl R Van Tongeren, Patty Van Cappellen, Julie J Exline","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2630925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2630925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emerging evidence suggests that nonreligious individuals may desire existential meaning and transcendent connection that extends beyond religious contexts. Personality psychology has long incorporated religion and spirituality, however, existing tools assess the presence of religious beliefs or general spirituality, and there is no validated measure to assess the motivational state that we term <i>spiritual yearning.</i> This study aimed to examine the structure of spiritual yearning and develop reliable measures. Across three studies of nonreligious adults (total <i>N</i> = 1,579), we conducted exploratory bifactor analysis and bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM). Results revealed a strong general factor of spiritual yearning, along with nine group factors reflecting distinct yearnings: moral guidance, divine relationship, afterlife beliefs, communal belonging, transcendent interconnectedness, inner peace, spiritual experiences, authentic self-discovery, and meaningful legacy. Based on these results, we created two scales: a 9-item general yearning measure and a 27-item version incorporating a general scale and nine three-item subscales. All measures showed strong psychometric properties and initial evidence of predictive validity. Correlations indicated that general yearning was meaningfully related to existential concerns such as meaning in life, religious quest orientation, and spiritual struggles, while subscales also revealed theoretically meaningful unique associations with specific domains of spiritual struggle.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147377906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Preliminary Investigation of Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Scale of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents (C-MSERA). 青少年情绪调节多维量表(C-MSERA)中文版心理测量特性的初步研究。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2553616
Fang Wang, Ruiqin Gao, Melissa Duffy

The Multidimensional Scale of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents (MSERA) was initially developed to assess adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Mexican education contexts. Given the lack of instruments to measure adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Chinese educational settings, the current study adapted the English version of the scale to Chinese (C-MSERA) and provided initial validity evidence to support the use of the scale. The scale was translated into simplified Chinese. A sample of 1,798 Chinese adolescents reported their emotion-regulation strategies using the C-MSERA. Factor analysis supported the eight-factor structure of the C-MSERA, and the instrument's concurrent validity and internal consistency were also supported. The findings indicate that C-MSERA produces reliable and valid scores for measuring adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Chinese education settings.

青少年情绪调节多维量表(MSERA)最初是为了评估墨西哥教育背景下青少年的情绪调节策略而开发的。鉴于中国教育环境中缺乏测量青少年情绪调节策略的工具,本研究将该量表的英文版改编为中文版(C-MSERA),并提供了初步的效度证据来支持该量表的使用。量表被翻译成简体中文。1798名中国青少年使用C-MSERA报告了他们的情绪调节策略。因子分析支持C-MSERA的八因子结构,也支持仪器的并发效度和内部一致性。研究结果表明,C-MSERA可为衡量中国教育背景下青少年情绪调节策略提供可靠有效的评分。
{"title":"A Preliminary Investigation of Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Scale of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents (C-MSERA).","authors":"Fang Wang, Ruiqin Gao, Melissa Duffy","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2553616","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2553616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Multidimensional Scale of Emotion Regulation for Adolescents (MSERA) was initially developed to assess adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Mexican education contexts. Given the lack of instruments to measure adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Chinese educational settings, the current study adapted the English version of the scale to Chinese (C-MSERA) and provided initial validity evidence to support the use of the scale. The scale was translated into simplified Chinese. A sample of 1,798 Chinese adolescents reported their emotion-regulation strategies using the C-MSERA. Factor analysis supported the eight-factor structure of the C-MSERA, and the instrument's concurrent validity and internal consistency were also supported. The findings indicate that C-MSERA produces reliable and valid scores for measuring adolescents' emotion-regulation strategies in Chinese education settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"221-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145000840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is There Only One Well-Being for Younger Children and Preadolescents? The Revision of the SCWBS Questionnaire with Detailed Psychometric Properties. 幼儿和青春期前儿童只有一种幸福吗?SCWBS详细心理测量属性问卷的修订。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2538554
Marek Matouš Bula, Adam Klocek, Egle Havrdová

This study evaluates the assessment of the well-being of children and preadolescents by examining the psychometric properties of the Stirling Children's Well-Being Scale (SCWBS). Given the growing concerns about children's mental health, accurate and easily administrable measurement tools are urgently needed. This research represents the first in-depth investigation of the SCWBS's factor structure and psychometric characteristics in the largest sample of children under 15 years using multidimensional item response theory. Engaging 1701 children from fourth and sixth grades, we analyzed three SCWBS models: unidimensional, two-factor, and bi-factor models. We also investigated measurement invariance in gender and grade categories, as well as the convergent validity of the scale. The results suggest that, for this age group, the most appropriate approach to evaluate well-being is a unidimensional one, rather than separating it into subjective and psychological well-being. Additionally, we propose a three-point Likert scale for younger participants. Thus, based on our results and previous findings, we hypothesize that the sample under study perceived well-being per se, not specific domains of well-being.

本研究通过考察斯特林儿童幸福量表(SCWBS)的心理测量特征来评估儿童和前青少年的幸福感。鉴于人们对儿童心理健康的日益关注,迫切需要准确且易于管理的测量工具。本研究首次运用多维项目反应理论,对15岁以下儿童SCWBS的因素结构和心理测量特征进行了深入的研究。针对1701名四年级和六年级的儿童,我们分析了三种SCWBS模型:单维、双因素和双因素模型。我们还研究了性别和年级类别的测量不变性,以及量表的收敛效度。结果表明,对于这个年龄段的人来说,最合适的幸福感评估方法是单维的,而不是将其分为主观幸福感和心理幸福感。此外,我们为年轻的参与者提出了一个三点李克特量表。因此,根据我们的结果和以前的发现,我们假设研究中的样本感知幸福感本身,而不是特定的幸福感领域。
{"title":"Is There Only One Well-Being for Younger Children and Preadolescents? The Revision of the SCWBS Questionnaire with Detailed Psychometric Properties.","authors":"Marek Matouš Bula, Adam Klocek, Egle Havrdová","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2538554","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2538554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the assessment of the well-being of children and preadolescents by examining the psychometric properties of the Stirling Children's Well-Being Scale (SCWBS). Given the growing concerns about children's mental health, accurate and easily administrable measurement tools are urgently needed. This research represents the first in-depth investigation of the SCWBS's factor structure and psychometric characteristics in the largest sample of children under 15 years using multidimensional item response theory. Engaging 1701 children from fourth and sixth grades, we analyzed three SCWBS models: unidimensional, two-factor, and bi-factor models. We also investigated measurement invariance in gender and grade categories, as well as the convergent validity of the scale. The results suggest that, for this age group, the most appropriate approach to evaluate well-being is a unidimensional one, rather than separating it into subjective and psychological well-being. Additionally, we propose a three-point Likert scale for younger participants. Thus, based on our results and previous findings, we hypothesize that the sample under study perceived well-being per se, not specific domains of well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"169-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144817001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Development and Initial Validation of the Self-Presentational Defensiveness Scale. 自我表象防御量表的编制与初步验证。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2542259
Chris Sciberas, Marc A Fournier

Informed by psychoanalytic, humanistic, and cybernetic perspectives on defensive functioning, the present work established the psychometric structure and initial validation of the 10-item Self-Presentational Defensiveness Scale (SPDS). Across four studies (total N = 1,634), we assessed the item-level observability of the initial 20-item SPDS (Study 1), explored the psychometric structure of the initial SPDS in two separate samples (Studies 2 and 3), and established the psychometric properties of the final 10-item SPDS (Study 4), along with preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The SPDS demonstrated (a) item content that was rated as more observable compared to other commonly used measures of defensive functioning, (b) a robust substantive self-presentational defensiveness factor, (c) measurement invariance across gender (i.e., male and female) and measurement type (i.e., self and informant ratings), (d) substantial self-other agreement (i.e., r = .42), and (e) appropriate correlations with theoretically related constructs (e.g., neuroticism). These results demonstrate the reliability and initial validity of the SPDS and suggest that self-presentational defensiveness reflects a lack of personal accountability when confronted with negative self-relevant stimuli.

基于心理分析、人本主义和控制论对防御功能的研究,本研究建立了自我表象防御量表(SPDS)的心理测量结构和初步验证。在四项研究(共N = 1,634)中,我们评估了初始20项SPDS的项目水平可观察性(研究1),探索了初始SPDS在两个独立样本中的心理测量结构(研究2和3),并建立了最终10项SPDS的心理测量特性(研究4),以及收敛效度和判别效度的初步证据。SPDS证明了(a)与其他常用的防御功能测量方法相比,项目内容被评为更可观察的,(b)一个强大的实质性自我陈述性防御因子,(c)跨性别(即男性和女性)和测量类型(即自我和被告知者评分)的测量不变性,(d)实质性的自我-他人一致性(即r = 0.42),以及(e)与理论相关构式(如神经质)的适当相关性。这些结果证明了SPDS的可靠性和初始效度,并表明自我表象防御反映了面对消极自我相关刺激时缺乏个人责任。
{"title":"The Development and Initial Validation of the Self-Presentational Defensiveness Scale.","authors":"Chris Sciberas, Marc A Fournier","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2542259","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2542259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed by psychoanalytic, humanistic, and cybernetic perspectives on defensive functioning, the present work established the psychometric structure and initial validation of the 10-item Self-Presentational Defensiveness Scale (SPDS). Across four studies (total <i>N</i> = 1,634), we assessed the item-level observability of the initial 20-item SPDS (Study 1), explored the psychometric structure of the initial SPDS in two separate samples (Studies 2 and 3), and established the psychometric properties of the final 10-item SPDS (Study 4), along with preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The SPDS demonstrated (a) item content that was rated as more observable compared to other commonly used measures of defensive functioning, (b) a robust substantive self-presentational defensiveness factor, (c) measurement invariance across gender (i.e., male and female) and measurement type (i.e., self and informant ratings), (d) substantial self-other agreement (i.e., <i>r</i> = .42), and (e) appropriate correlations with theoretically related constructs (e.g., neuroticism). These results demonstrate the reliability and initial validity of the SPDS and suggest that self-presentational defensiveness reflects a lack of personal accountability when confronted with negative self-relevant stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"272-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145023539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Different Faces of Kindness. Development and Validation of the Kind Attitude Scale. 不同的善良面孔。友善态度量表的开发与验证。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2543010
Dorota Jasielska, Magdalena Poraj-Weder, Grzegorz Pajestka

Although kindness has been a subject of study for psychologists, the lack of consensus in defining and operationalizing this concept poses challenges in conducting reliable comparisons of research findings and frequently leads to inconsistencies in outcomes. The development of a tool that accounts for the multifaceted nature of kindness could facilitate progress in this area. A review of the research suggests that kindness is a complex construct, which can be classified as an attitude consisting of three dimensions: 1) emotional, related to the experience of positive emotions toward other people; 2) cognitive, manifested in beliefs about other people or humanity in general; and 3) behavioral, associated with the undertaking of specific actions aimed at improving the situation of others. A review of research and literature led to the construction of the Kind Attitude Scale (KAS). Study 1 aimed to verify its factor structure. It confirmed the validity of the proposed model, with the three dimensions of kindness. Study 2 further corroborated the three-factor model of kindness by examining the theoretical validity of the KAS. The obtained results confirmed the proposed three-factor model, indicating that the KAS is a reliable, gender-invariant measure and can be utilized in future research on kindness.

尽管善良一直是心理学家研究的主题,但在定义和操作这一概念方面缺乏共识,这给进行可靠的研究结果比较带来了挑战,并经常导致结果不一致。开发一种工具来解释善良的多面性可以促进这一领域的进步。研究表明,友善是一个复杂的构念,它可以被归类为一种由三个维度组成的态度:1)情感,与对他人的积极情绪体验有关;2)认知,表现为对他人或一般人类的信念;3)行为的,与采取旨在改善他人处境的具体行动有关。通过对研究和文献的回顾,构建了友善态度量表(KAS)。研究1旨在验证其因子结构。它证实了提出的模型的有效性,与三个维度的善良。研究2通过检验KAS的理论有效性,进一步证实了友善的三因素模型。得到的结果证实了提出的三因素模型,表明KAS是一种可靠的、性别不变性的测量方法,可以用于未来的善意研究。
{"title":"Different Faces of Kindness. Development and Validation of the Kind Attitude Scale.","authors":"Dorota Jasielska, Magdalena Poraj-Weder, Grzegorz Pajestka","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2543010","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2543010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although kindness has been a subject of study for psychologists, the lack of consensus in defining and operationalizing this concept poses challenges in conducting reliable comparisons of research findings and frequently leads to inconsistencies in outcomes. The development of a tool that accounts for the multifaceted nature of kindness could facilitate progress in this area. A review of the research suggests that kindness is a complex construct, which can be classified as an attitude consisting of three dimensions: 1) emotional, related to the experience of positive emotions toward other people; 2) cognitive, manifested in beliefs about other people or humanity in general; and 3) behavioral, associated with the undertaking of specific actions aimed at improving the situation of others. A review of research and literature led to the construction of the Kind Attitude Scale (KAS). Study 1 aimed to verify its factor structure. It confirmed the validity of the proposed model, with the three dimensions of kindness. Study 2 further corroborated the three-factor model of kindness by examining the theoretical validity of the KAS. The obtained results confirmed the proposed three-factor model, indicating that the KAS is a reliable, gender-invariant measure and can be utilized in future research on kindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"197-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric Evaluation and Sociodemographic Measurement Invariance of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index among Adolescents in Luxembourg. 卢森堡青少年WHO-5幸福指数的心理测量评价和社会人口测量不变性。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2569138
Romain Brisson

The World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index has been widely used to assess adolescents' well-being. However, its structural properties and measurement invariance at both between- and within-country levels have been underexamined in this population. The present study aimed to fill this gap. Relying on a nationally representative sample of 9,007 school attendees in Luxembourg (MAGE = 14.7; SDAGE = 2.4; 48.7% female) and on both classical test theory and item response theory, I assessed the scalability, reliability, monotonicity, factorial structure, convergent validity, and sociodemographic measurement invariance of the WHO-5. Measurement invariance was investigated across groups differing in terms of academic performance, country of birth, language, sex, socioeconomic status, and type of school. The WHO-5 exhibited strong scalability (Loevinger's H = .550) as well as satisfactory reliability (McDonald's ω = .84), monotonicity, factorial validity, and convergent validity. Measurement invariance held across all the examined subgroups. This study suggests that the WHO-5 is a sound, unidimensional measure of well-being that can be used for comparisons across various sociodemographic adolescent groups.

世界卫生组织的五项幸福指数被广泛用于评估青少年的幸福。然而,在这一人群中,其结构特性和国家之间和国家内部水平的测量不变性尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在填补这一空白。根据卢森堡9,007名学校参与者的全国代表性样本(MAGE = 14.7; SDAGE = 2.4; 48.7%为女性),以及经典测试理论和项目反应理论,我评估了WHO-5的可扩展性、可靠性、单调性、因子结构、收敛效度和社会人口学测量不变性。测量的不变性在不同的学习成绩、出生国家、语言、性别、社会经济地位和学校类型的群体中进行了调查。WHO-5具有较强的可扩展性(Loevinger’s H = 0.550),令人满意的信度(McDonald’s ω = 0.84)、单调性、析因效度和收敛效度。在所有被检查的子组中保持测量不变性。这项研究表明,世卫组织-5是一种可靠的、单向度的福祉衡量标准,可用于不同社会人口统计学青少年群体之间的比较。
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation and Sociodemographic Measurement Invariance of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index among Adolescents in Luxembourg.","authors":"Romain Brisson","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2569138","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2569138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index has been widely used to assess adolescents' well-being. However, its structural properties and measurement invariance at both between- and within-country levels have been underexamined in this population. The present study aimed to fill this gap. Relying on a nationally representative sample of 9,007 school attendees in Luxembourg (<i>M</i><sub>AGE</sub> = 14.7; <i>SD</i><sub>AGE</sub> = 2.4; 48.7% female) and on both classical test theory and item response theory, I assessed the scalability, reliability, monotonicity, factorial structure, convergent validity, and sociodemographic measurement invariance of the WHO-5. Measurement invariance was investigated across groups differing in terms of academic performance, country of birth, language, sex, socioeconomic status, and type of school. The WHO-5 exhibited strong scalability (Loevinger's <i>H</i> = .550) as well as satisfactory reliability (McDonald's ω = .84), monotonicity, factorial validity, and convergent validity. Measurement invariance held across all the examined subgroups. This study suggests that the WHO-5 is a sound, unidimensional measure of well-being that can be used for comparisons across various sociodemographic adolescent groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"187-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145337196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Well-Being: Adolescent Development and Its Implications for Hedonic and Eudaimonic Traditions. 幸福:青少年发展及其对享乐主义和幸福主义传统的影响。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893
Paul B Ingram, Brian P Cole
{"title":"Commentary on Well-Being: Adolescent Development and Its Implications for Hedonic and Eudaimonic Traditions.","authors":"Paul B Ingram, Brian P Cole","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"304-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of personality assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1