首页 > 最新文献

Journal of personality assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Assessing the Response Process Validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Using Cognitive Interviews. 运用认知访谈评估创伤后成长量表的反应过程效度。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2609697
Amaris I Grant, R Michael Furr, Eranda Jayawickreme

Post-traumatic growth (PTG) refers to perceived positive psychological changes following highly distressing or traumatic events. Although PTG has garnered significant attention from both researchers and the broader public, its assessment has largely depended on retrospective measures such as the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). These measures presume that respondents engage in a complex psychological process (e.g., recalling pre- and post-trauma functioning) to accurately report veridical growth. However, the extent to which people follow this process has not been directly examined. In the present study, we assessed the PTGI's response process validity by conducting 21 cognitive interviews to determine whether participants engaged in the theoretically required steps using five items from the PTGI. None of the participants fully completed this process for every item. Instead, thematic analysis showed that they drew on themes related to preserving continuity in their life narratives, using reappraisal coping, and adhering to cultural scripts favoring positive transformation. In other words, participants reported positive change even when their narratives pointed to negative, neutral, or resilient experiences. These findings add to concerns about the PTGI's construct validity as a measure of genuine growth following adversity.

创伤后成长(PTG)是指在高度痛苦或创伤性事件后感知到的积极心理变化。尽管PTG已经引起了研究人员和广大公众的极大关注,但其评估在很大程度上依赖于回顾性测量,如创伤后生长量表(PTGI)。这些措施假设受访者参与一个复杂的心理过程(例如,回忆创伤前和创伤后的功能),以准确地报告真实的成长。然而,人们遵循这一过程的程度尚未得到直接调查。在本研究中,我们通过21个认知访谈来评估PTGI的反应过程效度,以确定参与者是否使用PTGI中的五个项目参与了理论要求的步骤。没有一个参与者完全完成了每个项目的这个过程。相反,主题分析表明,他们借鉴了与保持生活叙事连续性有关的主题,使用重新评估应对,并坚持有利于积极转变的文化剧本。换句话说,即使参与者的叙述指向消极、中性或弹性的经历,他们也报告了积极的变化。这些发现增加了人们对PTGI作为逆境后真实成长衡量标准的结构效度的关注。
{"title":"Assessing the Response Process Validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Using Cognitive Interviews.","authors":"Amaris I Grant, R Michael Furr, Eranda Jayawickreme","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2609697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2609697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-traumatic growth (PTG) refers to perceived positive psychological changes following highly distressing or traumatic events. Although PTG has garnered significant attention from both researchers and the broader public, its assessment has largely depended on retrospective measures such as the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). These measures presume that respondents engage in a complex psychological process (e.g., recalling pre- and post-trauma functioning) to accurately report veridical growth. However, the extent to which people follow this process has not been directly examined. In the present study, we assessed the PTGI's response process validity by conducting 21 cognitive interviews to determine whether participants engaged in the theoretically required steps using five items from the PTGI. None of the participants fully completed this process for every item. Instead, thematic analysis showed that they drew on themes related to preserving continuity in their life narratives, using reappraisal coping, and adhering to cultural scripts favoring positive transformation. In other words, participants reported positive change even when their narratives pointed to negative, neutral, or resilient experiences. These findings add to concerns about the PTGI's construct validity as a measure of genuine growth following adversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Construct Validation Study of the DMRS-SR-30 Defensive Categories Utilizing the Interpersonal Circumplex. DMRS-SR-30防卫类别的人际环构效研究。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2609701
JoAnna Molina, Carly Kahn, Emily Dowgwillo

Defenses or unconscious strategies used to manage anxiety and preserve self-concept are useful for understanding personality functioning and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Despite defenses' clinical and interpersonal relevance, psychometrically sound self-report measures of defenses are limited. The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30), a newly developed self-report measure, provides scores for overall defensive functioning and mature, neurotic, and immature defenses. Given defenses' interpersonal nature, the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) can be used to examine the DMRS-SR-30's construct validity. The current study uses self-report data from 361 participants recruited from Amazon's MTurk to examine the interpersonal characteristics of overall defensive functioning and defensive categories. Results from structural summary method analyses align with theoretical expectations for each category, supporting the use of the measure. The mature defensive category was associated with submissive problems, submissive warm efficacies, and sensitivity to antagonism and had the lowest levels of interpersonal distress and misanthropy and the highest levels of interpersonal efficacy. The neurotic defensive category was associated with submissive problems, cold efficacies, and the second highest level of interpersonal distress. The immature category was associated with dominant problems, dominant cold efficacies, and sensitivity to dependence and had the highest levels of interpersonal distress and misanthropy.

用于管理焦虑和保持自我概念的防御或无意识策略对于理解人格功能和人际关系的质量是有用的。尽管防御具有临床和人际相关性,但心理测量学上健全的自我报告防御措施是有限的。防御机制评定量表-自我报告-30 (DMRS-SR-30)是一种新开发的自我报告测量方法,提供了整体防御功能和成熟、神经质和不成熟防御的分数。考虑到防卫的人际性,人际环型(IPC)可以用来检验DMRS-SR-30的构式效度。目前的研究使用了从亚马逊的MTurk招募的361名参与者的自我报告数据,以检查整体防御功能和防御类别的人际特征。结构总结方法分析的结果与每个类别的理论期望一致,支持该措施的使用。成熟防御类型与顺从问题、顺从温暖效应和对抗敏感性相关,人际痛苦和厌世程度最低,人际效能程度最高。神经质的防御类别与顺从问题、感冒效应和第二高水平的人际困扰有关。不成熟类别与显性问题、显性冷效和依赖敏感性相关,并且具有最高水平的人际困扰和厌世。
{"title":"A Construct Validation Study of the DMRS-SR-30 Defensive Categories Utilizing the Interpersonal Circumplex.","authors":"JoAnna Molina, Carly Kahn, Emily Dowgwillo","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2609701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2609701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defenses or unconscious strategies used to manage anxiety and preserve self-concept are useful for understanding personality functioning and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Despite defenses' clinical and interpersonal relevance, psychometrically sound self-report measures of defenses are limited. The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30), a newly developed self-report measure, provides scores for overall defensive functioning and mature, neurotic, and immature defenses. Given defenses' interpersonal nature, the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) can be used to examine the DMRS-SR-30's construct validity. The current study uses self-report data from 361 participants recruited from Amazon's MTurk to examine the interpersonal characteristics of overall defensive functioning and defensive categories. Results from structural summary method analyses align with theoretical expectations for each category, supporting the use of the measure. The mature defensive category was associated with submissive problems, submissive warm efficacies, and sensitivity to antagonism and had the lowest levels of interpersonal distress and misanthropy and the highest levels of interpersonal efficacy. The neurotic defensive category was associated with submissive problems, cold efficacies, and the second highest level of interpersonal distress. The immature category was associated with dominant problems, dominant cold efficacies, and sensitivity to dependence and had the highest levels of interpersonal distress and misanthropy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Multivariate Generalizability Theory-Based Analysis of Responses to the IPIP-NEO-120. 基于综合多元概化理论的IPIP-NEO-120响应分析。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2606013
Walter P Vispoel, Hyeri Hong, Hyeryung Lee, Tingting Chen

The 120-item International Personality Item Pool-NEO questionnaire (IPIP-NEO-120) was recently developed to measure the same Big Five global domain and nested facet constructs included in the 240-item Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) but more efficiently and at no cost to users. We summarize evidence of reliability and validity for IPIP-NEO-120 scores reported in previous research and further evaluate the psychometric properties of those scores using multivariate generalizability theory (MGT) procedures based on data collected from 447,500 respondents. We used MGT techniques to derive indices of score accuracy for both norm- and criterion-referencing purposes, produce more appropriate indices of accuracy for domain composite scores, estimate correlations between facet scores within each domain corrected for measurement error, and determine value gained when reporting facet in addition to domain scores. Results revealed that indices of score accuracy for domains generally exceeded those for facets, that facet score constructs were more strongly intercorrelated than would otherwise be inferred, and that 28 out of the 30 facet subscales provided added value beyond associated domain scales. We identify facet subscales most in need of improvement and provide code in R to enable readers to apply all demonstrated techniques to their own data.

120项国际人格项目池-NEO问卷(IPIP-NEO-120)是最近开发的,用于测量与240项修订NEO人格量表(NEO PI-R)相同的五大全球领域和嵌套面结构,但更有效且对用户免费。我们总结了先前研究报告的IPIP-NEO-120分数的信度和效度证据,并基于收集的447,500名受访者的数据,使用多元概化理论(MGT)程序进一步评估这些分数的心理测量特性。我们使用MGT技术为规范和标准参考目的导出得分准确性指数,为领域综合得分生成更合适的准确性指数,估计校正了测量误差的每个领域内facet得分之间的相关性,并确定在报告除领域分数之外的facet得分时获得的价值。结果表明,领域的得分准确性指数普遍高于facet的得分准确性指数,facet得分结构的相互关系比推断的更为强烈,并且30个facet子量表中有28个提供了超出相关领域量表的附加价值。我们确定了最需要改进的facet子尺度,并提供了R代码,使读者能够将所有演示的技术应用到自己的数据中。
{"title":"A Comprehensive Multivariate Generalizability Theory-Based Analysis of Responses to the IPIP-NEO-120.","authors":"Walter P Vispoel, Hyeri Hong, Hyeryung Lee, Tingting Chen","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2606013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2606013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 120-item International Personality Item Pool-NEO questionnaire (IPIP-NEO-120) was recently developed to measure the same Big Five global domain and nested facet constructs included in the 240-item Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) but more efficiently and at no cost to users. We summarize evidence of reliability and validity for IPIP-NEO-120 scores reported in previous research and further evaluate the psychometric properties of those scores using multivariate generalizability theory (MGT) procedures based on data collected from 447,500 respondents. We used MGT techniques to derive indices of score accuracy for both norm- and criterion-referencing purposes, produce more appropriate indices of accuracy for domain composite scores, estimate correlations between facet scores within each domain corrected for measurement error, and determine value gained when reporting facet in addition to domain scores. Results revealed that indices of score accuracy for domains generally exceeded those for facets, that facet score constructs were more strongly intercorrelated than would otherwise be inferred, and that 28 out of the 30 facet subscales provided added value beyond associated domain scales. We identify facet subscales most in need of improvement and provide code in R to enable readers to apply all demonstrated techniques to their own data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Well-Being: Adolescent Development and Its Implications for Hedonic and Eudaimonic Traditions. 幸福:青少年发展及其对享乐主义和幸福主义传统的影响。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893
Paul B Ingram, Brian P Cole
{"title":"Commentary on Well-Being: Adolescent Development and Its Implications for Hedonic and Eudaimonic Traditions.","authors":"Paul B Ingram, Brian P Cole","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2606893","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rolling in the Deep of Personality: Psychometric Properties of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization - Revised (STIPO-R) in Italy. 在人格的深处滚动:人格组织结构化访谈的心理测量特性-修订(STIPO-R)在意大利。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2606011
Emanuele Preti, Marco Di Sarno, Erika Fanti, Caterina Felici, Fabio Madeddu, Rossella Di Pierro

The STIPO-R (Structured Interview of Personality Organization - Revised) is an interview assessing personality organization across five major functional domains (identity, object relations, defenses, aggression, moral values). In contrast to a-theoretical models, the STIPO-R offers a theoretically grounded conceptualization of personality pathology based on object-relations theory. This study tests psychometric properties of the interview across mixed psychiatric patients (N = 180) and community individuals (N = 170) in Italy. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that a bifactor model with five specific factors and a general factor had good fit. The latent scores discriminated between patients and controls, while some specific dimensions differentiated those with PDs from other psychiatric patients. The STIPO-R had sensible correlations with criterion measures, including maladaptive personality traits and symptom distress. Finally, a network analysis on the mean scores of the STIPO-R suggested no major difference in the network structure between patients and controls, indicating that the dimensions of defenses, aggression, and identity were the most interconnected in the networks. The STIPO-R appears to be a valid tool to assess personality impairment, and a good operationalization of the psychodynamic theory of personality pathology upon which it is built.

STIPO-R(人格组织结构化访谈-修订版)是一种评估人格组织五个主要功能领域(身份、对象关系、防御、攻击、道德价值观)的访谈。与a-理论模型相比,STIPO-R提供了基于客体关系理论的人格病理学的理论基础概念化。本研究测试了意大利混合精神病患者(N = 180)和社区个体(N = 170)访谈的心理测量特性。验证性因子分析表明,由5个特定因子和1个一般因子组成的双因子模型具有较好的拟合效果。潜在得分区分了患者和对照组,而某些特定维度区分了pd患者和其他精神病患者。STIPO-R与标准测量有明显的相关性,包括适应不良人格特征和症状困扰。最后,对STIPO-R平均得分的网络分析表明,患者和对照组之间的网络结构没有显著差异,表明防御、攻击和身份维度在网络中联系最紧密。STIPO-R似乎是评估人格障碍的有效工具,也是人格病理学心理动力学理论的良好操作化。
{"title":"Rolling in the Deep of Personality: Psychometric Properties of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization - Revised (STIPO-R) in Italy.","authors":"Emanuele Preti, Marco Di Sarno, Erika Fanti, Caterina Felici, Fabio Madeddu, Rossella Di Pierro","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2606011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2606011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The STIPO-R (Structured Interview of Personality Organization - Revised) is an interview assessing personality organization across five major functional domains (identity, object relations, defenses, aggression, moral values). In contrast to a-theoretical models, the STIPO-R offers a theoretically grounded conceptualization of personality pathology based on object-relations theory. This study tests psychometric properties of the interview across mixed psychiatric patients (<i>N</i> = 180) and community individuals (<i>N</i> = 170) in Italy. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that a bifactor model with five specific factors and a general factor had good fit. The latent scores discriminated between patients and controls, while some specific dimensions differentiated those with PDs from other psychiatric patients. The STIPO-R had sensible correlations with criterion measures, including maladaptive personality traits and symptom distress. Finally, a network analysis on the mean scores of the STIPO-R suggested no major difference in the network structure between patients and controls, indicating that the dimensions of defenses, aggression, and identity were the most interconnected in the networks. The STIPO-R appears to be a valid tool to assess personality impairment, and a good operationalization of the psychodynamic theory of personality pathology upon which it is built.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability and Validity of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure in Japan: Insights into General and Specific Psychiatric Symptom Assessment. 日本DSM-5一级交叉症状测量的信度和效度:对一般和特殊精神症状评估的见解。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2527702
Takafumi Soda, Asako Toyama, Mizuho Takeda, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yuichi Yamashita

The dimensional approach to psychiatric symptoms, including the general psychopathology factor (p-factor), has gained increasing attention for its potential to elucidate pathophysiology and inform treatment. However, comprehensive assessment of transdiagnostic psychiatric symptoms remains particularly challenging, especially in Japan. The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) was developed to capture a broad spectrum of symptoms across disorders, yet its validity in assessing both specific symptoms and the p-factor remains underexplored. This study examined the reliability and validity of the DSM-XC in a general population sample in Japan. The results demonstrated that the total DSM-XC score exhibited high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity with self-reported psychiatric measures. However, item-level analysis revealed that several items had low test-retest reliability. Moreover, factor analysis indicated that the DSM-XC primarily captures internalizing symptoms rather than general psychopathology. These findings suggest that while the DSM-XC may serve as an indirect indicator of the p-factor, its ability to directly measure the p-factor itself and assess specific symptoms requires further scrutiny. Although the DSM-XC provides a convenient tool for partly evaluating general and specific symptoms, its limitations underscore the need for further refinement to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of psychopathology.

精神症状的维度方法,包括一般精神病理因子(p-因子),因其阐明病理生理学和告知治疗的潜力而受到越来越多的关注。然而,对跨诊断精神症状的全面评估仍然特别具有挑战性,特别是在日本。DSM-5第1级交叉症状测量(DSM-XC)的开发是为了捕获跨疾病的广泛症状谱,但其在评估特定症状和p因子方面的有效性仍未得到充分探索。本研究检验了DSM-XC在日本普通人群样本中的信度和效度。结果表明,DSM-XC总分具有较高的内部一致性、重测信度和收敛效度。然而,项目水平分析显示,有几个项目有低的重测信度。此外,因子分析表明,DSM-XC主要捕获内化症状,而不是一般的精神病理。这些发现表明,虽然DSM-XC可以作为p因子的间接指标,但其直接测量p因子本身和评估特定症状的能力需要进一步审查。尽管DSM-XC为部分评估一般和特定症状提供了方便的工具,但其局限性强调了进一步完善以实现更全面的精神病理学评估的必要性。
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure in Japan: Insights into General and Specific Psychiatric Symptom Assessment.","authors":"Takafumi Soda, Asako Toyama, Mizuho Takeda, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yuichi Yamashita","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2527702","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2527702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dimensional approach to psychiatric symptoms, including the general psychopathology factor (<i>p</i>-factor), has gained increasing attention for its potential to elucidate pathophysiology and inform treatment. However, comprehensive assessment of transdiagnostic psychiatric symptoms remains particularly challenging, especially in Japan. The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) was developed to capture a broad spectrum of symptoms across disorders, yet its validity in assessing both specific symptoms and the <i>p</i>-factor remains underexplored. This study examined the reliability and validity of the DSM-XC in a general population sample in Japan. The results demonstrated that the total DSM-XC score exhibited high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity with self-reported psychiatric measures. However, item-level analysis revealed that several items had low test-retest reliability. Moreover, factor analysis indicated that the DSM-XC primarily captures internalizing symptoms rather than general psychopathology. These findings suggest that while the DSM-XC may serve as an indirect indicator of the <i>p</i>-factor, its ability to directly measure the <i>p</i>-factor itself and assess specific symptoms requires further scrutiny. Although the DSM-XC provides a convenient tool for partly evaluating general and specific symptoms, its limitations underscore the need for further refinement to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144600832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Markers of Suicide Risk on the MMPI-3 Among Post-9/11 Veterans. 9/11后退伍军人MMPI-3的自杀风险标记
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2531179
Alec H Rothman, Jaime L Anderson, Dustin B Wygant

Suicide among post-9/11 U.S. military veterans has increased dramatically, with effective identification of veteran suicide risk remaining a national priority. We investigated the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in assessing suicide risk within this population. Participants were 189 post-9/11 veterans, predominantly male (75.1%) and White/Caucasian (77.8%), who completed the MMPI-3 and self-report measures of suicidality. In this cross-sectional study, we compared MMPI-3 profiles of veterans reporting a lifetime history of suicidal ideation only or suicide attempts to those who did not, with a focus on the Suicidal/Death Ideation (SUI) scale and markers of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. One-way ANOVAs revealed large effect sizes for SUI in differentiating veterans who reported no suicidal ideation from those with suicide attempts (d = 3.33) and those with suicidal ideation only (d = 1.81), as well as veterans who reported suicidal ideation only from those who also reported past suicide attempts (d = .88). With a few exceptions, markers of internalizing (e.g., Demoralization [RCd]) significantly differentiated the no suicidal ideation group from the suicidal ideation only (ds = .52-1.12) and suicide attempt groups (ds = .48-1.59), while markers of externalizing (e.g., DISC) differentiated the suicidal ideation only and suicide attempt groups (ds = .50-.60). Analyses also revealed very large correlations between SUI and the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) Suicidality scale (r = .74), and Self-Harm Inventory (r = .51). The SUI scale incremented the RC scales and other SP scales in predicting IDAS-II Suicidality scores (11%-16% additional variance) and SHI scores (2%-4% additional variance). These findings underscore the clinical utility of the MMPI-3, particularly the SUI scale, in comprehensive suicide risk assessments.

9/11后美国的自杀率退伍军人急剧增加,有效识别退伍军人自杀风险仍然是国家的优先事项。我们调查了明尼苏达多相人格量表-3 (MMPI-3)在评估该人群自杀风险中的效用。参与者为189名9/11后退伍军人,主要为男性(75.1%)和白人/高加索人(77.8%),他们完成了MMPI-3和自杀自我报告测量。在这项横断面研究中,我们比较了报告一生中只有自杀意念或有自杀企图的退伍军人的MMPI-3谱,重点关注自杀/死亡意念(SUI)量表和内化和外化精神病理学标记。单因素方差分析显示,SUI在区分无自杀意念的退伍军人与有自杀企图的退伍军人(d = 3.33)、有自杀意念的退伍军人(d = 1.81)以及有自杀意念的退伍军人与有自杀企图的退伍军人(d = 0.88)方面具有很大的效应值。除少数例外,内化标记(如士气消沉[RCd])显著区分无自杀意念组、有自杀意念组(ds = 0.52 -1.12)和有自杀企图组(ds = 0.48 -1.59),而外化标记(如DISC)显著区分有自杀意念组和有自杀企图组(ds = 0.50 - 0.60)。分析还显示SUI与抑郁和焦虑症状量表- ii (IDAS-II)自杀量表(r = 0.74)和自残量表(r = 0.51)之间存在非常大的相关性。SUI量表增加了RC量表和其他SP量表在预测IDAS-II自杀倾向得分(11%-16%的额外方差)和SHI得分(2%-4%的额外方差)方面的作用。这些发现强调了MMPI-3,特别是SUI量表在综合自杀风险评估中的临床应用。
{"title":"Markers of Suicide Risk on the MMPI-3 Among Post-9/11 Veterans.","authors":"Alec H Rothman, Jaime L Anderson, Dustin B Wygant","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2531179","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2531179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide among post-9/11 U.S. military veterans has increased dramatically, with effective identification of veteran suicide risk remaining a national priority. We investigated the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in assessing suicide risk within this population. Participants were 189 post-9/11 veterans, predominantly male (75.1%) and White/Caucasian (77.8%), who completed the MMPI-3 and self-report measures of suicidality. In this cross-sectional study, we compared MMPI-3 profiles of veterans reporting a lifetime history of suicidal ideation only or suicide attempts to those who did not, with a focus on the Suicidal/Death Ideation (SUI) scale and markers of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. One-way ANOVAs revealed large effect sizes for SUI in differentiating veterans who reported no suicidal ideation from those with suicide attempts (<i>d</i> = 3.33) and those with suicidal ideation only (<i>d</i> = 1.81), as well as veterans who reported suicidal ideation only from those who also reported past suicide attempts (<i>d</i> = .88). With a few exceptions, markers of internalizing (e.g., Demoralization [RCd]) significantly differentiated the no suicidal ideation group from the suicidal ideation only (<i>d</i>s = .52-1.12) and suicide attempt groups (<i>d</i>s = .48-1.59), while markers of externalizing (e.g., DISC) differentiated the suicidal ideation only and suicide attempt groups (<i>d</i>s = .50-.60). Analyses also revealed very large correlations between SUI and the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) Suicidality scale (<i>r</i> = .74), and Self-Harm Inventory (<i>r</i> = .51). The SUI scale incremented the RC scales and other SP scales in predicting IDAS-II Suicidality scores (11%-16% additional variance) and SHI scores (2%-4% additional variance). These findings underscore the clinical utility of the MMPI-3, particularly the SUI scale, in comprehensive suicide risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144731896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Chinese Personality in 8 Minutes: A Short Measure of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. 8分钟测量中国人的性格:五因素人格模型的简短测量。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2524373
Michelle Yik, Felity H C Kwok, Kim De Roover

Using data from three Chinese samples (Ns = 611, 403, 299) collected using both monolingual and bilingual designs, we evaluated the psychometric properties and factor structure of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory 3 (FFI-3), the short form of the NEO Personality Inventory 3 (PI-3), for use in Chinese communities. Although the FFI-3 contains only a quarter of the 240 items of the PI-3, exploratory structural equation modeling revealed that it maintained the five-factor structure of the long form and achieved acceptable levels of internal consistency, cross-language validity, and test-retest reliability. The correlation coefficients between the short-form factors and the corresponding long-form factors were all above .86, indicating a strong association between the short and long versions of the scale. Taken together, our findings suggest that the FFI-3 is a viable tool for mapping personality in Chinese communities.

采用单语和双语两种设计方式收集的三个中国样本(Ns = 611, 403, 299)的数据,我们评估了NEO五因素量表3 (FFI-3)的心理测量特性和因素结构,该量表是NEO人格量表3 (PI-3)的简称,可用于中国社区。虽然FFI-3只包含PI-3 240个条目的四分之一,但探索性结构方程模型显示,它保持了长形式的五因素结构,并达到了可接受的内部一致性、跨语言效度和重测信度水平。短形式因子与相应的长形式因子的相关系数均在0.86以上,说明量表的短版本与长版本之间存在较强的相关性。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明FFI-3是一个可行的工具来绘制中国社区的个性。
{"title":"Measuring Chinese Personality in 8 Minutes: A Short Measure of the Five-Factor Model of Personality.","authors":"Michelle Yik, Felity H C Kwok, Kim De Roover","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2524373","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2524373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using data from three Chinese samples (<i>N</i>s = 611, 403, 299) collected using both monolingual and bilingual designs, we evaluated the psychometric properties and factor structure of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory 3 (FFI-3), the short form of the NEO Personality Inventory 3 (PI-3), for use in Chinese communities. Although the FFI-3 contains only a quarter of the 240 items of the PI-3, exploratory structural equation modeling revealed that it maintained the five-factor structure of the long form and achieved acceptable levels of internal consistency, cross-language validity, and test-retest reliability. The correlation coefficients between the short-form factors and the corresponding long-form factors were all above .86, indicating a strong association between the short and long versions of the scale. Taken together, our findings suggest that the FFI-3 is a viable tool for mapping personality in Chinese communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"90-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144753643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tracing the Trajectory of Charles Manson's Interpersonal Dynamics: A Longitudinal Moment-to-Moment Analysis Using Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID). 追踪查尔斯·曼森人际动力学的轨迹:基于人际动力学连续评估(CAID)的纵向时刻到时刻分析。
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2515576
Erika Fanti, Alexandra L Halberstadt, A Esin Asan, Aaron L Pincus

Charles Manson, notorious for his involvement in the gruesome Tate-LaBianca murders of 1969, remains a polarizing figure. His case has divided not only the public but also clinicians and researchers, resulting in a wide array of diagnoses from personality disorders to schizophrenia. To shed light on this longstanding debate, this study employs a novel approach to systematically assess moment-to-moment dyadic interpersonal exchanges between Manson and several interviewers over a 21-year span. Utilizing Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID), we analyzed seven video-recorded interviews of Manson from 1972 to 1993. Unified Structural Equation Modeling revealed a consistent pattern of dominant and cold interpersonal behavior. Manson demonstrated high agency (dominance) and low communion (warmth) across all interactions but also the capacity for strategic interpersonal behaviors and goal-directed communication, contrasting with disorganized patterns typically associated with schizophrenia. Simulation Modeling Analysis revealed a progressive intensification and rigidity of dominant-cold interpersonal patterns over time. Our findings suggest that Manson's interpersonal style aligns more with severe personality pathology, particularly features of malignant narcissism, rather than a primary psychotic disorder. The study offers a new methodology to investigate complex cases of severe psychopathology and highlights the potential of assessing momentary interpersonal processes in forensic and clinical settings.

查尔斯·曼森因卷入1969年骇人听闻的泰特-拉比安卡谋杀案而臭名昭著,他仍然是一个两极分化的人物。他的病例不仅引起了公众的分歧,而且引起了临床医生和研究人员的分歧,导致了从人格障碍到精神分裂症的各种诊断。为了阐明这一长期存在的争论,本研究采用了一种新颖的方法,系统地评估了曼森和几位采访者在21年的时间里时刻到时刻的二元人际交流。利用CAID (Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics)对Manson在1972 - 1993年间的7次访谈录像进行了分析。统一结构方程模型揭示了显性和冷性人际行为的一致模式。Manson在所有的互动中都表现出高能动性(支配性)和低共融性(温暖性),但也表现出策略性人际行为和目标导向沟通的能力,这与精神分裂症典型的无组织模式形成鲜明对比。模拟建模分析显示,随着时间的推移,主导-冷人际模式逐渐强化和僵化。我们的研究结果表明,曼森的人际交往风格更符合严重的人格病理学,尤其是恶性自恋的特征,而不是原发性精神病。该研究提供了一种新的方法来调查复杂的严重精神病理学病例,并强调了在法医和临床环境中评估瞬间人际关系过程的潜力。
{"title":"Tracing the Trajectory of Charles Manson's Interpersonal Dynamics: A Longitudinal Moment-to-Moment Analysis Using Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID).","authors":"Erika Fanti, Alexandra L Halberstadt, A Esin Asan, Aaron L Pincus","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2515576","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2515576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charles Manson, notorious for his involvement in the gruesome Tate-LaBianca murders of 1969, remains a polarizing figure. His case has divided not only the public but also clinicians and researchers, resulting in a wide array of diagnoses from personality disorders to schizophrenia. To shed light on this longstanding debate, this study employs a novel approach to systematically assess moment-to-moment dyadic interpersonal exchanges between Manson and several interviewers over a 21-year span. Utilizing Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID), we analyzed seven video-recorded interviews of Manson from 1972 to 1993. Unified Structural Equation Modeling revealed a consistent pattern of dominant and cold interpersonal behavior. Manson demonstrated high agency (dominance) and low communion (warmth) across all interactions but also the capacity for strategic interpersonal behaviors and goal-directed communication, contrasting with disorganized patterns typically associated with schizophrenia. Simulation Modeling Analysis revealed a progressive intensification and rigidity of dominant-cold interpersonal patterns over time. Our findings suggest that Manson's interpersonal style aligns more with severe personality pathology, particularly features of malignant narcissism, rather than a primary psychotic disorder. The study offers a new methodology to investigate complex cases of severe psychopathology and highlights the potential of assessing momentary interpersonal processes in forensic and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"130-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144275167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multivariate Base Rates of Standard- and Skyline-Cutoff Elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory: Do They Distinguish Simulated from Genuine PTSD? 人格评估量表的标准和天际线截断高度的多变量基准率:它们能区分模拟PTSD和真实PTSD吗?
IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2530047
Stephen L Aita, Emily L Montgomery, Joshua E Caron, Louis A Pagano, Michael J Broggi, Paul B Ingram, Steven C Erickson, Nicholas C Borgogna, Grant G Moncrief, Robert M Roth, Matthew R Calamia, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Benjamin D Hill

Multivariate base rates (MBR) of elevations are an emerging psychometric paradigm for enhanced interpretation of multiscale self-report data. The aims of this study were to calculate and compare MBR of scale/subscale elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and determine the ability of MBR to differentiate between mood disorders (n = 524, k = 3), military-based posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; n = 252, k = 2), and coached PTSD-simulator (n = 160, k = 1) groups. Overall, having at least one standard (T ≥ 70) and skyline elevation on clinical scales and clinical subscales was common across the groups. However, differential abnormal elevation thresholds emerged for each group. For instance, it was unusual (i.e., MBR < 10%) for the mood disorders group to have ≥ 1 (9.7%) and for the genuine PTSD group to have ≥ 3 (9.1%) skyline-elevated clinical scales. For subscales, it was unusual for the mood and PTSD groups to have ≥ 3 (7.6%) and ≥ 7 (8.3%) skyline-elevated clinical subscales, respectively. Conversely, PTSD simulators commonly yielded profiles with standard- and skyline elevations on nearly all clinical scales and subscales. MBR cutoffs identified from receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses yielded robust sensitivity (.650-.806) and specificity (.833-.984) in differentiating genuine PTSD and mood disorder groups from PTSD simulators. MBR are useful in differentiating genuine from simulated psychopathology, consistent with broader scale-based infrequency approaches.

多元基线率(MBR)是一种新兴的心理测量范式,用于增强对多尺度自我报告数据的解释。本研究的目的是计算和比较人格评估量表(PAI)的量表/亚量表升高的MBR,并确定MBR区分情绪障碍(n = 524, k = 3)、军事创伤后应激障碍(PTSD;n = 252, k = 2)和创伤后应激障碍训练模拟器组(n = 160, k = 1)。总体而言,在临床量表和临床亚量表上至少有一个标准(T≥70)和天际线海拔在各组中是常见的。然而,各组出现不同的异常升高阈值。例如,情绪障碍组的临床量表≥1(9.7%)和真正的PTSD组的临床量表≥3(9.1%)的天际线升高是不寻常的(即MBR < 10%)。对于亚量表,情绪组和PTSD组分别有≥3(7.6%)和≥7(8.3%)天际线升高的临床亚量表并不常见。相反,创伤后应激障碍模拟器通常在几乎所有临床量表和亚量表上得出标准和天际线海拔的剖面。从接受者-操作特征曲线分析中确定的MBR截止值在区分真正的PTSD和情绪障碍组与PTSD模拟组时产生了强大的灵敏度(0.650 - 0.806)和特异性(0.833 - 0.984)。MBR在区分真正的精神病理和模拟的精神病理方面是有用的,与更广泛的基于规模的罕见方法是一致的。
{"title":"Multivariate Base Rates of Standard- and Skyline-Cutoff Elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory: Do They Distinguish Simulated from Genuine PTSD?","authors":"Stephen L Aita, Emily L Montgomery, Joshua E Caron, Louis A Pagano, Michael J Broggi, Paul B Ingram, Steven C Erickson, Nicholas C Borgogna, Grant G Moncrief, Robert M Roth, Matthew R Calamia, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Benjamin D Hill","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2530047","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2530047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multivariate base rates (MBR) of elevations are an emerging psychometric paradigm for enhanced interpretation of multiscale self-report data. The aims of this study were to calculate and compare MBR of scale/subscale elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and determine the ability of MBR to differentiate between mood disorders (<i>n</i> = 524, <i>k</i> = 3), military-based posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; <i>n</i> = 252, <i>k</i> = 2), and coached PTSD-simulator (<i>n</i> = 160, <i>k</i> = 1) groups. Overall, having <i>at least</i> one standard (<i>T</i> ≥ 70) and skyline elevation on clinical scales and clinical subscales was common across the groups. However, differential abnormal elevation thresholds emerged for each group. For instance, it was <i>unusual</i> (i.e., MBR < 10%) for the mood disorders group to have ≥ 1 (9.7%) and for the genuine PTSD group to have ≥ 3 (9.1%) skyline-elevated clinical scales. For subscales, it was <i>unusual</i> for the mood and PTSD groups to have ≥ 3 (7.6%) and ≥ 7 (8.3%) skyline-elevated clinical subscales, respectively. Conversely, PTSD simulators commonly yielded profiles with standard- and skyline elevations on nearly all clinical scales and subscales. MBR cutoffs identified from receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses yielded robust sensitivity (.650-.806) and specificity (.833-.984) in differentiating genuine PTSD and mood disorder groups from PTSD simulators. MBR are useful in differentiating genuine from simulated psychopathology, consistent with broader scale-based infrequency approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"65-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144675091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of personality assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1