Do You Want to Stay Single? Considerations on Single-Arm Trials in Drug Development and the Postregulatory Space.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutical Statistics Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/pst.2412
Yulia Dyachkova, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Nathalie Barbier, Jenny Devenport, Stefan Franzén, Gbenga Kazeem, Thomas Künzel, Pierre Mancini, Giacomo Mordenti, Knut Richert, Antonia Ridolfi, Daniel Saure
{"title":"Do You Want to Stay Single? Considerations on Single-Arm Trials in Drug Development and the Postregulatory Space.","authors":"Yulia Dyachkova, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Nathalie Barbier, Jenny Devenport, Stefan Franzén, Gbenga Kazeem, Thomas Künzel, Pierre Mancini, Giacomo Mordenti, Knut Richert, Antonia Ridolfi, Daniel Saure","doi":"10.1002/pst.2412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-arm trials (SATs), while not preferred, remain in use throughout the drug development cycle. They may be accepted by regulators in particular contexts (e.g., in oncology or rare diseases) when the potential effects of new treatments are very large and placebo treatment is unethical. However, in the postregulatory space, SATs are common, and perhaps even more poorly suited to address the questions of interest. In this manuscript, we review regulatory and HTA positions on SATs; challenges posed by SATs to address research questions beyond regulators, evolving statistical methods to provide context for SATs, case studies where SATs could and could not address questions of interest, and communication strategies to influence decision making and optimize study design to address evidence needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-arm trials (SATs), while not preferred, remain in use throughout the drug development cycle. They may be accepted by regulators in particular contexts (e.g., in oncology or rare diseases) when the potential effects of new treatments are very large and placebo treatment is unethical. However, in the postregulatory space, SATs are common, and perhaps even more poorly suited to address the questions of interest. In this manuscript, we review regulatory and HTA positions on SATs; challenges posed by SATs to address research questions beyond regulators, evolving statistical methods to provide context for SATs, case studies where SATs could and could not address questions of interest, and communication strategies to influence decision making and optimize study design to address evidence needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
您想继续单臂试验吗?药物开发中的单臂试验和后监管空间的考虑。
单臂试验(SAT)虽然不是首选,但在整个药物开发周期中仍在使用。在特定情况下(如肿瘤或罕见病),如果新疗法的潜在效果非常大,而安慰剂治疗又不道德,监管机构可能会接受单臂试验。然而,在后监管领域,SATs 很常见,也许更不适合解决人们感兴趣的问题。在本手稿中,我们回顾了监管机构和 HTA 对 SAT 的立场;SAT 在解决监管机构之外的研究问题时所面临的挑战;为 SAT 提供背景的不断发展的统计方法;SAT 能够和不能解决相关问题的案例研究;以及影响决策和优化研究设计以满足证据需求的沟通策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
期刊最新文献
On Some Modeling Issues in Estimating Vaccine Efficacy Propensity Score Analysis With Baseline and Follow-Up Measurements of the Outcome Variable. Generalizing Treatment Effect to a Target Population Without Individual Patient Data in a Real-World Setting. Comparative Analyses of Bioequivalence Assessment Methods for In Vitro Permeation Test Data. Simultaneous Inference Using Multiple Marginal Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1