National Cancer Institute-funded grants focused on synchronous telehealth cancer care delivery: a portfolio analysis.

Roxanne E Jensen, Rachelle Brick, Joshua Medel, Priyanga Tuovinen, Paul B Jacobsen, Rebecca Hardesty, Robin C Vanderpool
{"title":"National Cancer Institute-funded grants focused on synchronous telehealth cancer care delivery: a portfolio analysis.","authors":"Roxanne E Jensen, Rachelle Brick, Joshua Medel, Priyanga Tuovinen, Paul B Jacobsen, Rebecca Hardesty, Robin C Vanderpool","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a complementary source of cancer care delivery. Understanding research funding trends in cancer-related telehealth can highlight developments in this area of science and identify future opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Applications funded by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2016 and 2022 and focused on synchronous patient-provider telehealth were analyzed for grant characteristics (eg, funding mechanism), cancer focus (eg, cancer type), and study features (eg, type of telehealth service). Of 106 grants identified initially, 60 were retained for coding after applying exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost three-quarters (73%) of telehealth grants were funded during fiscal years 2020-2022. Approximately 67% were funded through R01 or R37 mechanism and implemented as randomized controlled trials (63%). Overall, telehealth grants commonly focused on treatment (30%) and survivorship (43%); breast cancer (12%), hematologic malignancies (10%), and multiple cancer sites (27%); and health disparity populations (ie, minorities, rural residents) (73%). Both audio and video telehealth were common (65%), as well as accompanying mHealth apps (20%). Telehealth services centered on psychosocial care, self-management, and supportive care (88%); interventions were commonly delivered by mental health professionals (30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NCI has observed an increase in funded synchronous patient-provider telehealth grants. Trends indicate an evolution of awards that have expanded across the cancer control continuum, applied rigorous study designs, incorporated additional digital technologies, and focused on populations recognized for disparate cancer outcomes. As telehealth is integrated into routine cancer care delivery, additional research evidence will be needed to inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a complementary source of cancer care delivery. Understanding research funding trends in cancer-related telehealth can highlight developments in this area of science and identify future opportunities.

Methods: Applications funded by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2016 and 2022 and focused on synchronous patient-provider telehealth were analyzed for grant characteristics (eg, funding mechanism), cancer focus (eg, cancer type), and study features (eg, type of telehealth service). Of 106 grants identified initially, 60 were retained for coding after applying exclusion criteria.

Results: Almost three-quarters (73%) of telehealth grants were funded during fiscal years 2020-2022. Approximately 67% were funded through R01 or R37 mechanism and implemented as randomized controlled trials (63%). Overall, telehealth grants commonly focused on treatment (30%) and survivorship (43%); breast cancer (12%), hematologic malignancies (10%), and multiple cancer sites (27%); and health disparity populations (ie, minorities, rural residents) (73%). Both audio and video telehealth were common (65%), as well as accompanying mHealth apps (20%). Telehealth services centered on psychosocial care, self-management, and supportive care (88%); interventions were commonly delivered by mental health professionals (30%).

Conclusion: NCI has observed an increase in funded synchronous patient-provider telehealth grants. Trends indicate an evolution of awards that have expanded across the cancer control continuum, applied rigorous study designs, incorporated additional digital technologies, and focused on populations recognized for disparate cancer outcomes. As telehealth is integrated into routine cancer care delivery, additional research evidence will be needed to inform clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国国家癌症研究所资助的侧重于同步远程医疗癌症护理服务的赠款:组合分析。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程保健的使用有所增加,目前仍是癌症护理服务的补充来源。了解与癌症相关的远程医疗的研究资助趋势可以突出这一科学领域的发展并确定未来的机会:对美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)在 2016 财年至 2022 财年期间资助的、以患者-医护人员同步远程医疗为重点的申请进行了分析,分析内容包括资助特点(如资助机制)、癌症重点(如癌症类型)和研究特点(如远程医疗服务类型)。在最初确定的 106 项资助中,有 60 项在应用排除标准后被保留下来进行编码:结果:近四分之三(73%)的远程医疗基金是在 2020-2022 财年获得资助的。约 67% 通过 R01 或 R37 机制获得资助,并以随机对照试验的形式实施(63%)。总体而言,远程医疗拨款通常侧重于治疗(30%)和幸存者(43%);乳腺癌(12%)、血液恶性肿瘤(10%)和多部位癌症(27%);以及健康差异人群(即少数民族、农村居民)(73%)。音频和视频远程保健都很常见(65%),配套的移动医疗应用程序也很常见(20%)。远程保健服务以社会心理护理、自我管理和支持性护理为中心(88%);干预措施通常由心理健康专业人员提供(30%):NCI观察到受资助的患者-提供者同步远程医疗补助金有所增加。这一趋势表明,获奖项目的范围已扩展到癌症控制的各个环节,采用了严格的研究设计,融入了更多的数字技术,并将重点放在了被公认为癌症结果不同的人群上。随着远程保健被纳入常规癌症护理服务,需要更多的研究证据为临床实践提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer: opportunities and challenges. Correction to: A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models. Data quality in a survey of registered medical cannabis users with cancer: nonresponse and measurement error. Item response theory analysis of benefits and harms of cannabis use in cancer survivors. Overview of cancer patient perspectives on cannabis use during treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1