Political sentiment and credit ratings

Mostafa Monzur Hasan, Ashrafee Hossain, Haiyan Jiang
{"title":"Political sentiment and credit ratings","authors":"Mostafa Monzur Hasan, Ashrafee Hossain, Haiyan Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between firms’ political sentiment (PSENT) and their credit ratings. Using US public firms as the sample, we reveal that PSENT is positively associated with corporate credit ratings. Furthermore, we find evidence indicating that a positive PSENT leads to higher credit ratings, while a negative PSENT results in lower credit ratings. We also demonstrate that PSENT is positively (negatively) associated with the investment grade and rating upgrade (rating downgrade). The cross-sectional analysis indicates that the positive relationship between PSENT and credit ratings is more evident among firms facing severe information asymmetry, financial distress risk, and weaker governance. Additionally, we observe that PSENT leads to higher new debt issuance. Finally, we conduct a survey of credit analysts and find evidence that corroborates our findings from empirical analyses. Overall, our study suggests that PSENT has an essential bearing on corporate credit quality.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between firms’ political sentiment (PSENT) and their credit ratings. Using US public firms as the sample, we reveal that PSENT is positively associated with corporate credit ratings. Furthermore, we find evidence indicating that a positive PSENT leads to higher credit ratings, while a negative PSENT results in lower credit ratings. We also demonstrate that PSENT is positively (negatively) associated with the investment grade and rating upgrade (rating downgrade). The cross-sectional analysis indicates that the positive relationship between PSENT and credit ratings is more evident among firms facing severe information asymmetry, financial distress risk, and weaker governance. Additionally, we observe that PSENT leads to higher new debt issuance. Finally, we conduct a survey of credit analysts and find evidence that corroborates our findings from empirical analyses. Overall, our study suggests that PSENT has an essential bearing on corporate credit quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治情绪和信用评级
本研究探讨了企业政治情绪(PSENT)与企业信用评级之间的关系。以美国上市公司为样本,我们发现 PSENT 与企业信用评级呈正相关。此外,我们发现有证据表明,政治情绪(PSENT)为正值时,信用评级较高,而政治情绪(PSENT)为负值时,信用评级较低。我们还证明,PSENT 与投资等级和评级升级(评级降级)呈正(负)相关。横截面分析表明,在面临严重信息不对称、财务困境风险和治理薄弱的企业中,PSENT 与信用评级之间的正相关关系更为明显。此外,我们还发现 PSENT 会导致新债发行量增加。最后,我们对信用分析师进行了调查,发现有证据证实了我们的实证分析结果。总之,我们的研究表明,PSENT 对企业信用质量有着至关重要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the dynamics of treasury bond yields: From term structure modelling to economic scenario generation Labor litigation and corporate cash holdings: Insights from the textual analysis of judicial documents Bankruptcy forecasting — Market information with ensemble model Earnings management in local government healthcare reporting: Financial distress vs. peer influence? Does more effective director monitoring make management guidance more credible?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1