Improved understanding of calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models using fitness landscape metrics

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131586
S. Zhu , H.R. Maier , A.C. Zecchin , M.A. Thyer , J.H.A. Guillaume
{"title":"Improved understanding of calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models using fitness landscape metrics","authors":"S. Zhu ,&nbsp;H.R. Maier ,&nbsp;A.C. Zecchin ,&nbsp;M.A. Thyer ,&nbsp;J.H.A. Guillaume","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ease and efficiency with which conceptual rainfall runoff (CRR) models can be calibrated, as well as issues related to the uniqueness of their parameters, has received significant attention in literature. While several studies have tried to gain a better understanding of the underlying factors affecting these issues by examining the features of model error surfaces, this has generally been done in an ad-hoc fashion using lower-dimensional representations of higher-dimensional surfaces. In this paper, it is suggested that exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) metrics can be used to quantify key features of the error surfaces of CRR models, including their roughness and flatness, as well as their degree of optima dispersion throughout the surface. This enables key error surface features of CRR models to be compared in a consistent, efficient and easily communicable fashion for models with different combinations of attributes (e.g. model structure, catchment climate conditions, error metrics, and calibration data set lengths). Results from the application of ELA metrics to the error surfaces of 420 CRR models with different combinations of the above attributes indicate that increasing model complexity results in an increase in relative error surface roughness and relative optima dispersion and that, while increasing catchment wetness increases the relative roughness of error surfaces, it also decreases optima dispersion. This suggests that for the models considered in this study, optimisation efficiency is likely to decrease with increasing model complexity and catchment wetness, while optimisation difficulty is likely to increase and parameter uniqueness likely to decrease with model complexity and catchment dryness. While implications for choice of model complexity will need further work, this study highlights the potential value of the proposed approach to understanding the calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942400982X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ease and efficiency with which conceptual rainfall runoff (CRR) models can be calibrated, as well as issues related to the uniqueness of their parameters, has received significant attention in literature. While several studies have tried to gain a better understanding of the underlying factors affecting these issues by examining the features of model error surfaces, this has generally been done in an ad-hoc fashion using lower-dimensional representations of higher-dimensional surfaces. In this paper, it is suggested that exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) metrics can be used to quantify key features of the error surfaces of CRR models, including their roughness and flatness, as well as their degree of optima dispersion throughout the surface. This enables key error surface features of CRR models to be compared in a consistent, efficient and easily communicable fashion for models with different combinations of attributes (e.g. model structure, catchment climate conditions, error metrics, and calibration data set lengths). Results from the application of ELA metrics to the error surfaces of 420 CRR models with different combinations of the above attributes indicate that increasing model complexity results in an increase in relative error surface roughness and relative optima dispersion and that, while increasing catchment wetness increases the relative roughness of error surfaces, it also decreases optima dispersion. This suggests that for the models considered in this study, optimisation efficiency is likely to decrease with increasing model complexity and catchment wetness, while optimisation difficulty is likely to increase and parameter uniqueness likely to decrease with model complexity and catchment dryness. While implications for choice of model complexity will need further work, this study highlights the potential value of the proposed approach to understanding the calibration efficiency, difficulty and parameter uniqueness of conceptual rainfall runoff models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用适应性景观指标,提高对概念性降雨径流模型的校准效率、难度和参数唯一性的认识
概念降雨径流(CRR)模型校核的难易程度和效率,以及与模型参数唯一性有关的问题,在文献中受到极大关注。虽然一些研究试图通过考察模型误差面的特征来更好地理解影响这些问题的潜在因素,但一般都是采用高维曲面的低维表示方法来临时完成的。本文提出,探索性景观分析(ELA)指标可用于量化 CRR 模型误差表面的关键特征,包括其粗糙度和平坦度,以及整个表面的最佳值分散程度。这样,对于具有不同属性组合(如模型结构、流域气候条件、误差指标和校核数据集长度)的模型,就能以一致、高效和易于交流的方式比较 CRR 模型误差面的关键特征。对 420 个具有上述不同属性组合的 CRR 模型的误差表面应用 ELA 指标的结果表明,模型复杂性的增加会导致相对误差表面粗糙度和相对最佳值离散度的增加,而流域湿度的增加会增加误差表面的相对粗糙度,同时也会减少最佳值离散度。这表明,对于本研究考虑的模型,优化效率可能会随着模型复杂度和集水区湿度的增加而降低,而优化难度可能会增加,参数唯一性可能会随着模型复杂度和集水区干度的增加而降低。虽然对模型复杂性选择的影响还需要进一步研究,但本研究强调了所提出的方法在了解概念性降雨径流模型的校准效率、难度和参数唯一性方面的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Dam-break flood hazard and risk assessment of large dam for emergency preparedness: A study of Ukai Dam, India Analytical model of contaminant advection, diffusion and degradation in capped sediments and sensitivity to flow and sediment properties High-resolution monitoring of soil infiltration using distributed fiber optic A hydro-geomorphologic assessment of flood generation potentiality in ungauged sub-basins and their prioritization based on traditional, statistical, MCDM and Nash-GIUH models of a tropical plateau-fringe River The causes of algal blooms exist significant scale effect in tributary of the Three Gorges Reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1