Study on the correlation and difference of qualitative information among three types of UPLC-HRMS and potential generalization in metabolites annotation

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Chromatography B Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124219
Zhongda Zeng , Jinfeng Huo , Yuxi Zhang , Yingjiao Shi , Zeying Wu , Qianxu Yang , Xiaodan Zhang
{"title":"Study on the correlation and difference of qualitative information among three types of UPLC-HRMS and potential generalization in metabolites annotation","authors":"Zhongda Zeng ,&nbsp;Jinfeng Huo ,&nbsp;Yuxi Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingjiao Shi ,&nbsp;Zeying Wu ,&nbsp;Qianxu Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaodan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The variation of qualitative information among different types of mainstream hyphenated instruments of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) makes data sharing and standardization, and further comparison of results consistency in metabolite annotation not easy to attain. In this work, a quantitative study of correlation and difference was first achieved to systematically investigate the variation of retention time (t<sub>R</sub>), precursor ion (MS<sup>1</sup>), and product fragment ions (MS<sup>2</sup>) generated by three typical UPLC-HRMS instruments commonly used in metabolomics area. In terms of the findings of systematic and correlated variation of t<sub>R</sub>, MS<sup>1</sup>, and MS<sup>2</sup> between different instruments, a computational strategy for integrated metabolite annotation was proposed to reduce the influence of differential ions, which made full use of the characteristic (common) and non-common fragments for scoring assessment. The regular variations of MS<sup>2</sup> among three instruments under four collision energy voltages of high, medium, low, and hybrid levels were respectively inspected with three technical replicates at each level. These discoveries could improve general metabolite annotation with a known database and similarity comparison. It should provide the potential for metabolite annotation to generalize qualitative information obtained under different experimental conditions or using instruments from various manufacturers, which is still a big headache in untargeted metabolomics. The mixture of standard compounds and serum samples with the addition of standards were applied to demonstrate the principle and performance of the proposed method. The results showed that it could be an optional strategy for general use in HRMS-based metabolomics to offset the difference in metabolite annotation. It has some potential in untargeted metabolomics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224002289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The variation of qualitative information among different types of mainstream hyphenated instruments of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) makes data sharing and standardization, and further comparison of results consistency in metabolite annotation not easy to attain. In this work, a quantitative study of correlation and difference was first achieved to systematically investigate the variation of retention time (tR), precursor ion (MS1), and product fragment ions (MS2) generated by three typical UPLC-HRMS instruments commonly used in metabolomics area. In terms of the findings of systematic and correlated variation of tR, MS1, and MS2 between different instruments, a computational strategy for integrated metabolite annotation was proposed to reduce the influence of differential ions, which made full use of the characteristic (common) and non-common fragments for scoring assessment. The regular variations of MS2 among three instruments under four collision energy voltages of high, medium, low, and hybrid levels were respectively inspected with three technical replicates at each level. These discoveries could improve general metabolite annotation with a known database and similarity comparison. It should provide the potential for metabolite annotation to generalize qualitative information obtained under different experimental conditions or using instruments from various manufacturers, which is still a big headache in untargeted metabolomics. The mixture of standard compounds and serum samples with the addition of standards were applied to demonstrate the principle and performance of the proposed method. The results showed that it could be an optional strategy for general use in HRMS-based metabolomics to offset the difference in metabolite annotation. It has some potential in untargeted metabolomics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种UPLC-HRMS定性信息的相关性和差异性及在代谢物标注中的潜在通用性研究。
不同类型的超高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱(UPLC-HRMS)主流联用仪器之间定性信息的差异使得数据共享和标准化以及代谢物标注结果一致性的进一步比较难以实现。本研究首先对代谢组学领域常用的三种典型 UPLC-HRMS 仪器产生的保留时间(tR)、前体离子(MS1)和产物碎片离子(MS2)的变化进行了系统研究,并对相关性和差异性进行了定量研究。针对不同仪器间tR、MS1和MS2的系统性和相关性变化,提出了一种综合代谢物注释的计算策略,以减少差异离子的影响,充分利用特征(共性)和非共性碎片进行评分评估。在高能、中能、低能和混合能四种碰撞电压下,分别检测了三种仪器的 MS2 的规律性变化,每种电压下有三个技术重复。这些发现可以利用已知数据库和相似性比较改进一般代谢物注释。这将为代谢物注释提供潜力,以归纳在不同实验条件下或使用不同厂家仪器获得的定性信息,而这在非靶向代谢组学中仍是一个令人头疼的问题。为了证明所提方法的原理和性能,我们应用了标准化合物混合物和添加了标准物质的血清样品。结果表明,在基于 HRMS 的代谢组学中,它可以作为一种可选的通用策略,以抵消代谢物注释的差异。它在非靶向代谢组学方面也有一定的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
期刊最新文献
Profiling the volatile compounds of Peganum harmala L. Based on multiple sample preparation coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis and explored its antidepressants-like activity Editorial Board Enantioseparation of six profenoid drugs by capillary electrophoresis with bovine serum albumin-modified gold nanoparticles as quasi-stationary phases Optimisation of isolation of polyphenols from Malus pumila Mill. Leaves by high-speed countercurrent chromatography using response surface methodology. Multi-omics combined to explore the purging mechanism of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Magnoliae Officinalis Cortex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1