Relation between ARFID symptomatology and picky eating onset and duration

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101900
Courtney E. Breiner , Megan M. Knedgen , Kaitlin B. Proctor , Hana F. Zickgraf
{"title":"Relation between ARFID symptomatology and picky eating onset and duration","authors":"Courtney E. Breiner ,&nbsp;Megan M. Knedgen ,&nbsp;Kaitlin B. Proctor ,&nbsp;Hana F. Zickgraf","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Picky eating (PE) is common in early childhood, peaking between ages 1 and 5 years. However, PE may persist beyond this normative period and pose threats to health and psychosocial functioning. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) involves restrictive eating driven by appetite, preference/selectivity, and/or fear of eating, leading to significant medical and/or psychosocial impairment. This retrospective study examined the relation between early childhood PE onset/duration and ARFID eating restrictions and symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Parents of children ages 6–17 (<em>N</em> = 437) completed a survey about their child's eating behavior, including the Nine-item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and questions about PE onset and impacts. Children were then categorized into groups based on PE onset (before or after age 5) and duration: never picky, normative picky, persistent picky, and late-onset picky.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The groups differed (all <em>p</em> &lt; .05) in mean NIAS subscales (picky eating, NIAS-PE; appetite, NIAS-A; fear, NIAS-F) and total scores (NIAS-T). Tukey post-hoc tests found that persistent PEs had significantly higher NIAS-PE, NIAS-A, and NIAS-T scores than never or normative PEs (all <em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> .05). Chi-Square tests found that persistent PEs were significantly more likely than all other groups to endorse ARFID criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings from this study suggest that PE that persists beyond or is identified after the normative period is associated with elevated ARFID symptoms compared to normative and never PEs. Persistent PE increases risk of impairment from PE and other ARFID eating restrictions. Given the health and psychosocial risks associated with ARFID, early identification and intervention for this group is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147101532400059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Picky eating (PE) is common in early childhood, peaking between ages 1 and 5 years. However, PE may persist beyond this normative period and pose threats to health and psychosocial functioning. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) involves restrictive eating driven by appetite, preference/selectivity, and/or fear of eating, leading to significant medical and/or psychosocial impairment. This retrospective study examined the relation between early childhood PE onset/duration and ARFID eating restrictions and symptoms.

Method

Parents of children ages 6–17 (N = 437) completed a survey about their child's eating behavior, including the Nine-item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and questions about PE onset and impacts. Children were then categorized into groups based on PE onset (before or after age 5) and duration: never picky, normative picky, persistent picky, and late-onset picky.

Results

The groups differed (all p < .05) in mean NIAS subscales (picky eating, NIAS-PE; appetite, NIAS-A; fear, NIAS-F) and total scores (NIAS-T). Tukey post-hoc tests found that persistent PEs had significantly higher NIAS-PE, NIAS-A, and NIAS-T scores than never or normative PEs (all p < .05). Chi-Square tests found that persistent PEs were significantly more likely than all other groups to endorse ARFID criteria.

Conclusion

Findings from this study suggest that PE that persists beyond or is identified after the normative period is associated with elevated ARFID symptoms compared to normative and never PEs. Persistent PE increases risk of impairment from PE and other ARFID eating restrictions. Given the health and psychosocial risks associated with ARFID, early identification and intervention for this group is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ARFID 症状与挑食开始和持续时间之间的关系。
背景:挑食(PE)在幼儿期很常见,在 1 到 5 岁之间达到高峰。然而,挑食可能会持续到这一正常时期之后,并对健康和社会心理功能构成威胁。回避型/限制型食物摄入障碍(ARFID)是指受食欲、偏好/选择性和/或对进食的恐惧驱使而限制进食,从而导致严重的医疗和/或心理社会功能损害。这项回顾性研究探讨了儿童早期 PE 发病/持续时间与 ARFID 饮食限制和症状之间的关系:方法:6-17 岁儿童的家长(N = 437)填写了一份有关其子女饮食行为的调查表,其中包括九项 ARFID 筛选(NIAS)以及有关 PE 发病和影响的问题。然后,根据 PE 发病时间(5 岁之前或之后)和持续时间将儿童分为以下几组:从不挑食、正常挑食、持续挑食和晚发挑食:结果:各组之间存在差异(均为 p):本研究的结果表明,与正常和从不挑食的儿童相比,持续挑食超过正常年龄段或在正常年龄段之后才被发现的儿童挑食与 ARFID 症状的升高有关。持续性 PE 会增加因 PE 和其他 ARFID 饮食限制而导致身体受损的风险。鉴于与 ARFID 相关的健康和社会心理风险,有必要对这一群体进行早期识别和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1