Aspects of glass and hybridization protocols for bonding of fiber posts to root dentine

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Oral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/eos.13002
Bárbara Facco Rauber, João Paulo De Carli, Felipe Gomes Dallepiane, Letícia Copatti Dogenski, Fábio Goedel, Doglas Cecchin, Huriel Scartazzini Palhano, Pedro Henrique Corazza, Kauê Farias Collares, Matheus Albino Souza, Ana Paula Farina
{"title":"Aspects of glass and hybridization protocols for bonding of fiber posts to root dentine","authors":"Bárbara Facco Rauber,&nbsp;João Paulo De Carli,&nbsp;Felipe Gomes Dallepiane,&nbsp;Letícia Copatti Dogenski,&nbsp;Fábio Goedel,&nbsp;Doglas Cecchin,&nbsp;Huriel Scartazzini Palhano,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Corazza,&nbsp;Kauê Farias Collares,&nbsp;Matheus Albino Souza,&nbsp;Ana Paula Farina","doi":"10.1111/eos.13002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin using push-out (PO) and diametral compression (DC), testing glycolic acid as a conditioner and varying dentin moisture. An additional aim was to test whether DC can be an alternative test to PO for bond strength assessment. Eighty bovine teeth were divided into eight groups (<i>n</i> = 10) defined by the use of either 37% glycolic acid or 37% phosphoric acid (PA) on moist or wet dentin before bonding with either Adapter SingleBond/RelyX ARC or One Step Plus/Duo-Link Bisco. Each tooth provided discs with an internal diameter of 2 mm, external diameter of 5 mm, and height of 2 mm, which underwent PO and DC. Finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out on 3D models. When analyzing PO results through linear regression, the highest values of bond strength were observed using glycolic acid on wet dentin in the cervical and middle thirds of the teeth. Analyzing DC results, the only statistical influence on values was the dental thirds. The scatterplot of the DC results and the PO bond strength values indicated no relationship between the results of the two tests (<i>r</i> = 0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.64). PO test detected more sensitive changes in bond strength values than DC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"132 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.13002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin using push-out (PO) and diametral compression (DC), testing glycolic acid as a conditioner and varying dentin moisture. An additional aim was to test whether DC can be an alternative test to PO for bond strength assessment. Eighty bovine teeth were divided into eight groups (n = 10) defined by the use of either 37% glycolic acid or 37% phosphoric acid (PA) on moist or wet dentin before bonding with either Adapter SingleBond/RelyX ARC or One Step Plus/Duo-Link Bisco. Each tooth provided discs with an internal diameter of 2 mm, external diameter of 5 mm, and height of 2 mm, which underwent PO and DC. Finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out on 3D models. When analyzing PO results through linear regression, the highest values of bond strength were observed using glycolic acid on wet dentin in the cervical and middle thirds of the teeth. Analyzing DC results, the only statistical influence on values was the dental thirds. The scatterplot of the DC results and the PO bond strength values indicated no relationship between the results of the two tests (r = 0.03; p = 0.64). PO test detected more sensitive changes in bond strength values than DC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维桩与根部牙本质粘接的玻璃和杂化规程的各个方面。
本研究使用推出法(PO)和直径压缩法(DC)评估了玻璃纤维桩与牙根牙本质的粘接强度,并测试了作为调节剂的乙醇酸和不同的牙本质湿度。该研究的另一个目的是测试直径压缩是否可以替代推挤法进行粘接强度评估。在使用 Adapter SingleBond/RelyX ARC 或 One Step Plus/Duo-Link Bisco 粘接之前,在潮湿或湿润的牙本质上使用 37% 乙醇酸或 37% 磷酸 (PA) 将 80 颗牛牙分为 8 组(n = 10)。每颗牙齿都提供了内径为 2 毫米、外径为 5 毫米、高度为 2 毫米的牙盘,并对其进行了 PO 和 DC 处理。在三维模型上进行了有限元分析(FEA)。通过线性回归分析PO结果,在牙颈部和牙中部三分之二的湿牙本质上使用乙醇酸观察到的粘接强度值最高。在分析直流结果时,唯一对数值有统计影响的是牙齿的三分之二。DC结果和PO粘接强度值的散点图表明,两种测试结果之间没有关系(r = 0.03; p = 0.64)。与 DC 相比,PO 测试能更灵敏地检测出粘接强度值的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Effects of cross-linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Effect of masticatory muscle function on the craniofacial sutures of the anterior viscerocranium in growing rats. Gender variability in palpation performance for temporomandibular disorders with three different methods: An experimental study. Bond strength of resin-based restorative materials to fast-setting calcium silicate cement using different resin adhesive systems. Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1