Social inequalities in medical appointment cancellations and reschedulings at the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae101
Jeanna-Eve Pousson, Florence Jusot, Léna Silberzan, Nathalie Bajos
{"title":"Social inequalities in medical appointment cancellations and reschedulings at the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.","authors":"Jeanna-Eve Pousson, Florence Jusot, Léna Silberzan, Nathalie Bajos","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inconsistent results are found regarding social inequalities related to healthcare appointment cancellations during the COVID-19 crisis. Whether rescheduling was associated with social status is unknown. By studying both cancellations and rescheduling, we comprehensively describe which social groups were affected by care disruption. First follow-up of a random population-based cohort was used, including 95 118 people aged 18 or older at baseline and who live in France. Poisson and multinomial regressions were used to study social factors associated with experiencing both medical appointment cancellation by health professionals during the first COVID-19 lockdown, and rescheduling within six months. Among all individuals (including those without scheduled appointment), 21.1% reported cancellations initiated by healthcare professionals. Women, the richest, and those with a chronic disease were the most affected by these cancellations. Although 78.1% who had their appointment cancelled obtained a new appointment within six months, 6.6% failed to reschedule and 15.2% did not want to reschedule. While the oldest were more likely to reschedule, regardless of their health status, the poorest and those with multiple chronic diseases were less likely to do so. Difficulties in rescheduling revealed certain social groups were ultimately more penalized by the restriction of access to care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that the poorest people, a social group that is in poorer health condition compared to other groups, were the most affected, our results raise questions about the ability of the healthcare system to reduce social health inequalities during a major health crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"652-659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inconsistent results are found regarding social inequalities related to healthcare appointment cancellations during the COVID-19 crisis. Whether rescheduling was associated with social status is unknown. By studying both cancellations and rescheduling, we comprehensively describe which social groups were affected by care disruption. First follow-up of a random population-based cohort was used, including 95 118 people aged 18 or older at baseline and who live in France. Poisson and multinomial regressions were used to study social factors associated with experiencing both medical appointment cancellation by health professionals during the first COVID-19 lockdown, and rescheduling within six months. Among all individuals (including those without scheduled appointment), 21.1% reported cancellations initiated by healthcare professionals. Women, the richest, and those with a chronic disease were the most affected by these cancellations. Although 78.1% who had their appointment cancelled obtained a new appointment within six months, 6.6% failed to reschedule and 15.2% did not want to reschedule. While the oldest were more likely to reschedule, regardless of their health status, the poorest and those with multiple chronic diseases were less likely to do so. Difficulties in rescheduling revealed certain social groups were ultimately more penalized by the restriction of access to care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that the poorest people, a social group that is in poorer health condition compared to other groups, were the most affected, our results raise questions about the ability of the healthcare system to reduce social health inequalities during a major health crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国 COVID-19 疫情爆发时取消预约和重新预约的社会不平等现象。
关于在 COVID-19 危机期间取消医疗预约的社会不平等现象,结果并不一致。重新安排时间是否与社会地位相关尚不清楚。通过对取消预约和重新安排预约的研究,我们全面描述了哪些社会群体受到了医疗服务中断的影响。我们采用了随机人群队列的首次随访,其中包括 95 118 名基线年龄在 18 岁或以上、居住在法国的人。我们使用泊松回归和多项式回归研究了在第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间被医护人员取消就诊预约和在六个月内重新安排就诊预约的相关社会因素。在所有人(包括没有预约的人员)中,21.1% 的人报告了医疗专业人员主动取消预约的情况。女性、最富有人群和慢性病患者受取消预约的影响最大。虽然 78.1%被取消预约的人在 6 个月内获得了新的预约,但仍有 6.6%的人未能重新预约,15.2%的人不想重新预约。无论健康状况如何,年龄最大的人更有可能重新预约,而最贫穷的人和患有多种慢性疾病的人则较少重新预约。重新安排就诊时间的困难表明,在 COVID-19 第一波大流行期间,某些社会群体最终因就诊受限而受到了更大的惩罚。与其他群体相比,最贫穷的人是健康状况最差的社会群体,鉴于他们受到的影响最大,我们的研究结果提出了医疗保健系统在重大健康危机中减少社会健康不平等的能力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among German school leaders. Representative study findings and implications for an underserved occupational group. The Community Acute Respiratory Infection surveillance programme: an evaluation of a newly established surveillance programme in Scotland. Could digital twins be the next revolution in healthcare? How is health equity considered in policy evaluations employing quasi-experimental methods? A scoping review and content analysis. Predicting population-level vulnerability among pregnant women using routinely collected data and the added relevance of self-reported data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1