Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, PedsQL 4.0, and PROMIS-25 Profile v2.0 in pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1186/s12955-024-02264-9
Richard Huan Xu, Zuyi Zhao, Zhuxin Mao, Shengfeng Wang, Hui Xiong, Dong Dong
{"title":"Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, PedsQL 4.0, and PROMIS-25 Profile v2.0 in pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy.","authors":"Richard Huan Xu, Zuyi Zhao, Zhuxin Mao, Shengfeng Wang, Hui Xiong, Dong Dong","doi":"10.1186/s12955-024-02264-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3 L, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System 25-item version profile v2.0 (PROMIS-25), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ version 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL 4.0) in Chinese pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data used in this study were obtained via a web-based cross-sectional survey. Parents of pediatric patients with SMA completed the proxy-reported EQ-5D-Y-3 L, PedsQL 4.0, and PROMIS-25 measures. Information about socioeconomic and health status was also obtained. The ceiling and floor effects, factorial structure, convergent validity, and known-group validity of the three measures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and sixty-three parents of children aged from 5 to 12 completed the questionnaires. Strong floor effects were observed for the physical function components of the PROMIS-25 (41.3%) and PedsQL 4.0 (67.8%). For EQ-5D-Y-3 L, 84.6% of the respondents reported having \"a lot of\" problems with the dimensions \"walking\" and \"looking after myself.\" Minimal ceiling or floor effects were observed for the EQ-5D-Y-3 L index value. The confirmatory factor analysis supported a six-factor structure for the PROMIS-25, but did not support a four-factor structure for the PedsQL 4.0. All hypothesized correlations of the dimensions among the three measures were confirmed, with coefficients ranging from 0.28 to 0.68. Analysis of variance showed that EQ-5D-Y-3 L demonstrated better known-group validity than the other two measures in 14 out of 16 comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EQ-5D-Y-3 L showed better discriminant power than the other two measures. The physical health dimensions of all three measures showed the significant floor effects. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these measures at capturing and quantifying the impact of SMA on patients' health-related quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"22 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02264-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3 L, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System 25-item version profile v2.0 (PROMIS-25), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ version 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL 4.0) in Chinese pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).

Methods: The data used in this study were obtained via a web-based cross-sectional survey. Parents of pediatric patients with SMA completed the proxy-reported EQ-5D-Y-3 L, PedsQL 4.0, and PROMIS-25 measures. Information about socioeconomic and health status was also obtained. The ceiling and floor effects, factorial structure, convergent validity, and known-group validity of the three measures were assessed.

Results: Three hundred and sixty-three parents of children aged from 5 to 12 completed the questionnaires. Strong floor effects were observed for the physical function components of the PROMIS-25 (41.3%) and PedsQL 4.0 (67.8%). For EQ-5D-Y-3 L, 84.6% of the respondents reported having "a lot of" problems with the dimensions "walking" and "looking after myself." Minimal ceiling or floor effects were observed for the EQ-5D-Y-3 L index value. The confirmatory factor analysis supported a six-factor structure for the PROMIS-25, but did not support a four-factor structure for the PedsQL 4.0. All hypothesized correlations of the dimensions among the three measures were confirmed, with coefficients ranging from 0.28 to 0.68. Analysis of variance showed that EQ-5D-Y-3 L demonstrated better known-group validity than the other two measures in 14 out of 16 comparisons.

Conclusions: The EQ-5D-Y-3 L showed better discriminant power than the other two measures. The physical health dimensions of all three measures showed the significant floor effects. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these measures at capturing and quantifying the impact of SMA on patients' health-related quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓性肌肉萎缩症儿科患者的 EQ-5D-Y-3L、PedsQL 4.0 和 PROMIS-25 Profile v2.0 的测量特性。
研究目的本研究的目的是在中国脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)儿科患者中研究EQ-5D-Y-3 L、患者报告结果测量系统25项版资料v2.0(PROMIS-25)和儿科生活质量量表™4.0版通用核心量表(PedsQL 4.0)的心理测量学特性:本研究通过网络横断面调查获得数据。脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)儿科患者的家长填写了EQ-5D-Y-3 L、PedsQL 4.0和PROMIS-25问卷。此外,还获得了有关社会经济和健康状况的信息。对这三种测量方法的上限和下限效应、因子结构、收敛有效性和已知组有效性进行了评估:有 363 名 5 至 12 岁儿童的家长填写了问卷。PROMIS-25(41.3%)和 PedsQL 4.0(67.8%)的身体功能部分均有较强的底线效应。在 EQ-5D-Y-3 L 中,84.6% 的受访者表示在 "行走 "和 "照顾自己 "方面有 "很多 "问题。EQ-5D-Y-3 L 指数值的上限或下限效应很小。确认性因子分析支持 PROMIS-25 的六因子结构,但不支持 PedsQL 4.0 的四因子结构。所有假设的三个测量维度之间的相关性都得到了证实,系数从 0.28 到 0.68 不等。方差分析显示,在 16 次比较中,EQ-5D-Y-3 L 在 14 次比较中显示出的已知组有效性优于其他两种测量方法:结论:EQ-5D-Y-3 L 的判别能力优于其他两种测量方法。结论:EQ-5D-Y-3 L 比其他两种测量方法显示出更好的区分度,所有三种测量方法的身体健康维度都显示出显著的底线效应。这些研究结果为了解这些测量方法在捕捉和量化 SMA 对患者健康相关生活质量的影响方面的有效性提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Development of updated population norms for the SF-36 for Hungary and comparison with 1997-1998 norms. Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals. Personality traits and quality of life: a cross-sectional study in a middle-aged Iranian general population. A COSMIN systematic review of instruments for evaluating health-related quality of life in people with Hereditary Angioedema. Patients reported outcome of cognitive function scale: a psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1