Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography Detects Small Abdominal Lymph Node Metastasis by High Stiffness.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001089
Christian Neelsen, Thomas Elgeti, Tom Meyer, Ulrike Grittner, Lukas Mödl, Christian Furth, Dominik Geisel, Bernd Hamm, Ingolf Sack, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia
{"title":"Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography Detects Small Abdominal Lymph Node Metastasis by High Stiffness.","authors":"Christian Neelsen, Thomas Elgeti, Tom Meyer, Ulrike Grittner, Lukas Mödl, Christian Furth, Dominik Geisel, Bernd Hamm, Ingolf Sack, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is a clinical and research standard for evaluating malignant tumors and lymph node metastasis. However, quantitative analysis of nodal status is limited to measurement of short axis diameter (SAD), and metastatic lymph nodes below 10 mm in SAD are often not detected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) when added to RECIST 1.1 for detection of lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-five benign and 82 metastatic lymph nodes were prospectively examined by multifrequency MRE at 1.5 T using tomoelastography postprocessing at 30, 40, 50, and 60 Hz (total scan time of 4 minutes). Shear wave speed as a surrogate of soft tissue stiffness was provided in m/s. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography was used as reference standard for identification of abdominal lymph node metastasis from histologically confirmed primary tumors. The diagnostic performance of MRE was compared with that of SAD according to RECIST 1.1 and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using generalized linear mixed models and binary logistic mixed models. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for different cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metastatic lymph nodes (1.90 ± 0.57 m/s) were stiffer than benign lymph nodes (0.98 ± 0.20 m/s, P < 0.001). An area under the curve of 0.95 for a cutoff of 1.32 m/s was calculated. Using a conservative approach with 1.0 specificity, we found sensitivity (SAD/MRE/MRE + SAD, 0.56/0.84/0.88), negative predictive values (0.41/0.66/0.71), and overall accuracy (0.66/0.88/0.91) to be improved using MRE and even higher for combined MRE and SAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multifrequency MRE improves metastatic abdominal lymph node detection by 25% based on higher tissue stiffness-even for lymph nodes with an SAD ≤10 mm. Stiffness information is quick to obtain and would be a promising supplement to RECIST.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is a clinical and research standard for evaluating malignant tumors and lymph node metastasis. However, quantitative analysis of nodal status is limited to measurement of short axis diameter (SAD), and metastatic lymph nodes below 10 mm in SAD are often not detected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) when added to RECIST 1.1 for detection of lymph node metastasis.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five benign and 82 metastatic lymph nodes were prospectively examined by multifrequency MRE at 1.5 T using tomoelastography postprocessing at 30, 40, 50, and 60 Hz (total scan time of 4 minutes). Shear wave speed as a surrogate of soft tissue stiffness was provided in m/s. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography was used as reference standard for identification of abdominal lymph node metastasis from histologically confirmed primary tumors. The diagnostic performance of MRE was compared with that of SAD according to RECIST 1.1 and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using generalized linear mixed models and binary logistic mixed models. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for different cutoffs.

Results: Metastatic lymph nodes (1.90 ± 0.57 m/s) were stiffer than benign lymph nodes (0.98 ± 0.20 m/s, P < 0.001). An area under the curve of 0.95 for a cutoff of 1.32 m/s was calculated. Using a conservative approach with 1.0 specificity, we found sensitivity (SAD/MRE/MRE + SAD, 0.56/0.84/0.88), negative predictive values (0.41/0.66/0.71), and overall accuracy (0.66/0.88/0.91) to be improved using MRE and even higher for combined MRE and SAD.

Conclusions: Multifrequency MRE improves metastatic abdominal lymph node detection by 25% based on higher tissue stiffness-even for lymph nodes with an SAD ≤10 mm. Stiffness information is quick to obtain and would be a promising supplement to RECIST.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多频磁共振弹性成像通过高硬度检测腹部小淋巴结转移
目的:实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1 是评估恶性肿瘤和淋巴结转移的临床和研究标准。然而,结节状态的定量分析仅限于短轴直径(SAD)的测量,SAD 低于 10 毫米的转移淋巴结往往无法检测到。本研究的目的是评估多频磁共振弹性成像(MRE)加入 RECIST 1.1 检测淋巴结转移的价值:对 25 个良性淋巴结和 82 个转移性淋巴结在 1.5 T 下进行了前瞻性多频磁共振弹性成像检查,并在 30、40、50 和 60 Hz 下进行了断层弹性成像后处理(总扫描时间为 4 分钟)。剪切波速度是软组织硬度的替代指标,单位为 m/s。正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描被用作从组织学确诊的原发性肿瘤鉴别腹腔淋巴结转移的参考标准。根据 RECIST 1.1 将 MRE 的诊断性能与 SAD 的诊断性能进行了比较,并使用广义线性混合模型和二元逻辑混合模型通过接收器操作特征曲线分析进行了评估。计算了不同临界值的敏感性、特异性和预测值:转移性淋巴结(1.90 ± 0.57 m/s)比良性淋巴结(0.98 ± 0.20 m/s,P < 0.001)更硬。以 1.32 m/s 为临界值计算的曲线下面积为 0.95。使用特异性为 1.0 的保守方法,我们发现使用 MRE 可以提高灵敏度(SAD/MRE/MRE + SAD,0.56/0.84/0.88)、阴性预测值(0.41/0.66/0.71)和总体准确性(0.66/0.88/0.91),而 MRE 和 SAD 联合使用时,灵敏度和准确性甚至更高:结论:基于较高的组织硬度,多频 MRE 能将转移性腹腔淋巴结的检测率提高 25%--即使是 SAD ≤10 mm 的淋巴结。组织僵硬度信息可快速获取,是对 RECIST 的有力补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Hot Topics in Diagnostic Imaging-Encompassing Advances in MR, Photon-Counting CT, and Ultrasound. Implementation of an AI Algorithm in Clinical Practice to Reduce Missed Incidental Pulmonary Embolisms on Chest CT and Its Impact on Short-Term Survival. Tungsten-Based Contrast Agent for Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography in Calcified Coronaries: Comparison to Iodine in a Cardiovascular Phantom. Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study. Countering Calcium Blooming With Personalized Contrast Media Injection Protocols: The 1-2-3 Rule for Photon-Counting Detector CCTA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1