Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Listeria Species Recovered from Retail Outlets in Gauteng Province, South Africa

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100322
James Gana , Nomakorinte Gcebe , Rebone Moerane , Yusuf Ngoshe , Takula Tshuma , Khomotso Moabelo , Abiodun Adesiyun
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Listeria Species Recovered from Retail Outlets in Gauteng Province, South Africa","authors":"James Gana ,&nbsp;Nomakorinte Gcebe ,&nbsp;Rebone Moerane ,&nbsp;Yusuf Ngoshe ,&nbsp;Takula Tshuma ,&nbsp;Khomotso Moabelo ,&nbsp;Abiodun Adesiyun","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study determined the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of <em>Listeria</em> spp. (<em>L. monocytogenes, L. innocua,</em> and <em>L. welshimeri)</em> recovered from beef and beef products sold at retail outlets in Gauteng Province, South Africa. A total of 112 isolates of <em>Listeria</em> spp., including <em>L. monocytogenes</em> (37), <em>L. innocua</em> (65), and <em>L. welshimeri</em> (10), were recovered from beef and beef products collected from 48 retail outlets. <em>Listeria spp</em>. was recovered by direct selective plating following selective enrichment, and PCR was used to confirm and characterize recovered isolates. The disc diffusion method determined the resistance to 16 antimicrobial agents. All 112 isolates of <em>Listeria</em> spp. exhibited resistance to one or more antibiotics (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The prevalence of AMR in <em>Listeria</em> isolates was high for nalidixic acid (99.1%) and cefotaxime (80.4%) but low for gentamycin (2.7%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (3.6%), azithromycin (5.4%), and doxycycline (6.3%). Overall, for the three species of <em>Listeria,</em> the prevalence of resistance varied significantly only for streptomycin (<em>P</em> = 0.016) and tetracycline (<em>P</em> = 0.034). Multidrug-resistant isolates were detected in 75.7% (28/37), 61.5% (40/65), and 80% (8/10) isolates of <em>L. monocytogenes</em>, <em>L. innocua</em>, and <em>L. welshimeri,</em> respectively. The prevalence of AMR was significantly affected by the location and size of retail outlets, type of beef and beef products, and serogroups of <em>L. monocytogenes.</em> The high prevalence of AMR, particularly among the <em>L. monocytogenes</em> isolates, poses potential therapeutic implications for human consumers of contaminated beef products. There is, therefore, a need to regulate and enforce the use of antimicrobial agents in humans and animals in South Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001066/pdfft?md5=1e03a17feef46bf3f05515f2468cb2de&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24001066-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study determined the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of Listeria spp. (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, and L. welshimeri) recovered from beef and beef products sold at retail outlets in Gauteng Province, South Africa. A total of 112 isolates of Listeria spp., including L. monocytogenes (37), L. innocua (65), and L. welshimeri (10), were recovered from beef and beef products collected from 48 retail outlets. Listeria spp. was recovered by direct selective plating following selective enrichment, and PCR was used to confirm and characterize recovered isolates. The disc diffusion method determined the resistance to 16 antimicrobial agents. All 112 isolates of Listeria spp. exhibited resistance to one or more antibiotics (P < 0.05). The prevalence of AMR in Listeria isolates was high for nalidixic acid (99.1%) and cefotaxime (80.4%) but low for gentamycin (2.7%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (3.6%), azithromycin (5.4%), and doxycycline (6.3%). Overall, for the three species of Listeria, the prevalence of resistance varied significantly only for streptomycin (P = 0.016) and tetracycline (P = 0.034). Multidrug-resistant isolates were detected in 75.7% (28/37), 61.5% (40/65), and 80% (8/10) isolates of L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, and L. welshimeri, respectively. The prevalence of AMR was significantly affected by the location and size of retail outlets, type of beef and beef products, and serogroups of L. monocytogenes. The high prevalence of AMR, particularly among the L. monocytogenes isolates, poses potential therapeutic implications for human consumers of contaminated beef products. There is, therefore, a need to regulate and enforce the use of antimicrobial agents in humans and animals in South Africa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从南非豪登省零售店回收的李斯特菌的抗菌药耐药性概况。
该研究确定了从南非豪登省零售店出售的牛肉和牛肉制品中回收的李斯特菌属 (单核细胞增生李斯特菌、无核细胞李斯特菌和韦氏李斯特菌) 的抗菌素耐药性 (AMR) 图谱。从 48 个零售点收集的牛肉和牛肉制品中共分离出 112 株李斯特菌,其中包括单核细胞增生李斯特菌(37 株)、无核李斯特菌(65 株)和韦氏李斯特菌(10 株)。李斯特菌属是在选择性增菌后通过直接选择性平板法回收的,并使用 PCR 对回收的分离物进行确认和特征描述。盘扩散法测定了 16 种抗菌剂的耐药性。所有 112 个李斯特菌属分离物均对一种或多种抗生素具有耐药性(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Enumeration of the Bacillus cereus Group Using a Chromogenic Substrate that Targets Phosphatidylcholine Phospholipase C Activity. Evaluation of a postbiotic on Salmonella enterica prevalence, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance in the subiliac lymph nodes of cull dairy cattle. Hazard characterization of antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. isolated from mussel and oyster shellstock available for retail purchase in Canada. Generic Food Safety Assessment: A Framework to Evaluate Food Safety Hazards Emerging from Change(s) in the Primary Production System – A Case Study Involving Intercropping Investigation of Feedlot-level Use of a Direct-fed Microbial on Fecal Shedding of E. coli O157:H7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1