An area-based analysis of general practice fees in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1071/HC23157
Megan Pledger, Maite Irurzun-Lopez, Jacqueline Cumming
{"title":"An area-based analysis of general practice fees in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Megan Pledger, Maite Irurzun-Lopez, Jacqueline Cumming","doi":"10.1071/HC23157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The pursuit of health care equity is a fundamental objective for Aotearoa New Zealand, and patient co-payments in primary care challenge this goal. Aim This study aimed to investigate the relationship between primary health care co-payments and the sociodemographic variables in areas where general practices provide health care. Methods Using census data, facilities information from the Ministry of Health, and socioeconomic deprivation indices, linear regression models were used to explore the relationship between weighted average fees charged by general practices and various sociodemographic variables in statistical area 2 regions. Results The study finds that areas with higher proportions of males and economically deprived individuals are associated with lower weighted average fees. Conversely, areas with higher proportions of retirement-aged and European individuals are linked with higher weighted average fees. The inclusion of the Very-Low-Cost-Access variable, indicating a subsidy scheme at the general practice level, made all the sociodemographic variables practically insignificant, suggesting Very-Low-Cost-Access practices are in the right geographical location to target high needs groups. Discussion The findings affirm the complexity of health care inequities in Aotearoa New Zealand, influenced not only by financial factors but also by demographic variables as they play out geographically. While subsidy schemes like the Very-Low-Cost-Access scheme appear to reach groups with greater need, a high level of unmet need due to cost suggests that the fees are still too high. Policymakers need to consider disparities in the on-going health care reforms and make further changes to subsidy schemes to reduce unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 2","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The pursuit of health care equity is a fundamental objective for Aotearoa New Zealand, and patient co-payments in primary care challenge this goal. Aim This study aimed to investigate the relationship between primary health care co-payments and the sociodemographic variables in areas where general practices provide health care. Methods Using census data, facilities information from the Ministry of Health, and socioeconomic deprivation indices, linear regression models were used to explore the relationship between weighted average fees charged by general practices and various sociodemographic variables in statistical area 2 regions. Results The study finds that areas with higher proportions of males and economically deprived individuals are associated with lower weighted average fees. Conversely, areas with higher proportions of retirement-aged and European individuals are linked with higher weighted average fees. The inclusion of the Very-Low-Cost-Access variable, indicating a subsidy scheme at the general practice level, made all the sociodemographic variables practically insignificant, suggesting Very-Low-Cost-Access practices are in the right geographical location to target high needs groups. Discussion The findings affirm the complexity of health care inequities in Aotearoa New Zealand, influenced not only by financial factors but also by demographic variables as they play out geographically. While subsidy schemes like the Very-Low-Cost-Access scheme appear to reach groups with greater need, a high level of unmet need due to cost suggests that the fees are still too high. Policymakers need to consider disparities in the on-going health care reforms and make further changes to subsidy schemes to reduce unmet need.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区全科诊疗费用的地区分析。
导言:追求医疗保健公平是新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的基本目标,而初级医疗保健中的患者共同支付则是对这一目标的挑战。研究目的 本研究旨在调查全科医生提供医疗服务地区的初级医疗共同支付与社会人口变量之间的关系。方法 利用人口普查数据、卫生部提供的设施信息和社会经济贫困指数,使用线性回归模型探讨了统计区 2 地区全科医生加权平均收费与各种社会人口变量之间的关系。结果 研究发现,男性和经济贫困人口比例较高的地区,加权平均收费较低。相反,退休年龄人口和欧裔人口比例较高的地区加权平均费用较高。加入 "Very-Low-Cost-Access "变量后,所有社会人口变量实际上都变得不重要,这表明 "Very-Low-Cost-Access "诊所所处的地理位置适合针对高需求群体。讨论 研究结果表明,新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区的医疗保健不平等现象非常复杂,不仅受到经济因素的影响,而且还受到人口变量的影响,因为这些变量在地理位置上起着重要作用。尽管像 "超低成本准入计划 "这样的补贴计划似乎能够惠及更有需要的群体,但由于成本原因而未得到满足的需求水平很高,这表明收费仍然过高。政策制定者需要在正在进行的医疗改革中考虑差距问题,并进一步修改补贴计划,以减少未满足的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
A supported primary health pathway for mild traumatic brain injury quality improvement report. Can SSRI's help women suffering with PMS? Checklists for assessing ethical aspects of health technologies and services. Comfort with having sexual orientation recorded on official databases among a community and online sample of gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa New Zealand. Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: application of a practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer services in Aotearoa New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1