Managing medicines-related continuity of care: the views of a range of prescribers in New Zealand general practice.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1071/HC24034
C Julie Wells, Lynn McBain, Lesley Gray
{"title":"Managing medicines-related continuity of care: the views of a range of prescribers in New Zealand general practice.","authors":"C Julie Wells, Lynn McBain, Lesley Gray","doi":"10.1071/HC24034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Continuity of care is considered vital to achieving high-quality health care. Traditionally, general practitioners have played a key role in managing continuity of care and have largely been accountable for prescribing decision-making in primary care. Following prescribing legislation changes, a range of health disciplines make decisions regarding medicines in the general practice setting. To date, few studies have investigated how different prescribing disciplines view the management of medicines-related continuity of care. Understanding the views of these clinicians is important to achieving safe, effective and equitable outcomes from medicines. Aim The purpose of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers about their role in managing medicines-related continuity of care. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured in-depth interviews were undertaken with 16 prescribers based in eight North Island (New Zealand) general practices. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Results Three key themes were identified from data analysis: a patient-focused approach; interdisciplinary teamwork; and optimising the medicine regimen. Discussion Prescribers in this study identify the important connection between continuity of care and achieving good outcomes from medicines. Good patient-prescriber relationships and ongoing interdisciplinary relationships across all health settings are considered essential to medicines-related continuity of care. Prescribers experience challenges associated with increasing multimorbidity, medicines complexities and fragmentation of clinical records.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 4","pages":"364-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Continuity of care is considered vital to achieving high-quality health care. Traditionally, general practitioners have played a key role in managing continuity of care and have largely been accountable for prescribing decision-making in primary care. Following prescribing legislation changes, a range of health disciplines make decisions regarding medicines in the general practice setting. To date, few studies have investigated how different prescribing disciplines view the management of medicines-related continuity of care. Understanding the views of these clinicians is important to achieving safe, effective and equitable outcomes from medicines. Aim The purpose of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers about their role in managing medicines-related continuity of care. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured in-depth interviews were undertaken with 16 prescribers based in eight North Island (New Zealand) general practices. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Results Three key themes were identified from data analysis: a patient-focused approach; interdisciplinary teamwork; and optimising the medicine regimen. Discussion Prescribers in this study identify the important connection between continuity of care and achieving good outcomes from medicines. Good patient-prescriber relationships and ongoing interdisciplinary relationships across all health settings are considered essential to medicines-related continuity of care. Prescribers experience challenges associated with increasing multimorbidity, medicines complexities and fragmentation of clinical records.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理与药物相关的护理连续性:新西兰全科医生的观点。
引言 连续性医疗服务被认为是实现高质量医疗服务的关键。传统上,全科医生在管理医疗服务的连续性方面发挥着关键作用,并在很大程度上负责初级医疗服务中的处方决策。随着处方立法的修改,在全科医疗环境中,一系列的医疗学科都会对药品做出决策。迄今为止,很少有研究对不同处方学科如何看待与药品相关的持续护理管理进行调查。了解这些临床医生的观点对于实现安全、有效和公平的用药结果非常重要。目的 本研究旨在探讨全科医生、开处方的护士和开处方的药剂师对其在管理与药品相关的持续性护理中的角色的看法。方法 对北岛(新西兰)8 家全科诊所的 16 名处方医生进行了定性、半结构化的深入访谈。访谈内容逐字记录,并采用归纳法进行主题分析。结果 通过数据分析确定了三个关键主题:以患者为中心的方法;跨学科团队合作;优化用药方案。讨论 在这项研究中,处方医生发现了持续护理与实现良好用药效果之间的重要联系。良好的患者与处方医生之间的关系以及在所有医疗机构中持续的跨学科关系被认为是与药品相关的持续性医疗服务的关键。开处方者面临的挑战与日益增多的多病症、药物复杂性和临床记录的碎片化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does exercise benefit people with osteoarthritis of the knee? Community pharmacy service provision to adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life: a scoping review. Contribution of the community pharmacist workforce to primary care through the lens of medicines classification: comparison of Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Conventional medication adherence and self-treatment practices among South Asian immigrants: a qualitative study. Managing medicines-related continuity of care: the views of a range of prescribers in New Zealand general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1