The "Flapbot": A Global Perspective on the Validity and Usability of a Flap Monitoring Chatbot.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1055/a-2355-3970
Hamza Ejaz, Stephen R Ali, Juan E Berner, Thomas D Dobbs, Iain S Whitaker, Flapbot Collaborative
{"title":"The \"Flapbot\": A Global Perspective on the Validity and Usability of a Flap Monitoring Chatbot.","authors":"Hamza Ejaz, Stephen R Ali, Juan E Berner, Thomas D Dobbs, Iain S Whitaker, Flapbot Collaborative","doi":"10.1055/a-2355-3970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The Flapbot chatbot assists in free-flap monitoring, emphasizing accessibility, user-friendliness, and global reliability. This study assesses Flapbot's worldwide validity and usability and uses qualitative analysis to identify areas for future enhancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Flapbot, built on Google's DialogFlow, was evaluated by international plastic surgeons. Invitations were sent to the International Lower Limb Reconstruction Collaborative (INTELLECT), International Confederation of Plastic Surgery Societies (ICOPLAST), and the International Microsurgery Club. Out of the 42 surgeons who agreed to participate, 21 tested the Flapbot and completed an online survey on its validity and usability. The survey had 13 validity items and 10 usability items. Data analysis involved computing the individual content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-wide content validity index (S-CVI) for validity, and the system usability score (SUS) for usability. Thematic analysis distilled free-text responses to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Nine of 13 items had an I-CVI over 0.78, denoting significant relevance. The S-CVI score stood at 0.82, indicating high relevance. The SUS score was 68, representing average usability. Themes highlighted issues with the current model, development suggestions, and surgeons' concerns regarding growing reliance on digital tools in health care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Flapbot is a promising digital aid for free-flap monitoring. While it showcases notable validity and usability, improvements in functionality, usability, and accessibility are needed for broader global use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2355-3970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The Flapbot chatbot assists in free-flap monitoring, emphasizing accessibility, user-friendliness, and global reliability. This study assesses Flapbot's worldwide validity and usability and uses qualitative analysis to identify areas for future enhancement.

Methods:  Flapbot, built on Google's DialogFlow, was evaluated by international plastic surgeons. Invitations were sent to the International Lower Limb Reconstruction Collaborative (INTELLECT), International Confederation of Plastic Surgery Societies (ICOPLAST), and the International Microsurgery Club. Out of the 42 surgeons who agreed to participate, 21 tested the Flapbot and completed an online survey on its validity and usability. The survey had 13 validity items and 10 usability items. Data analysis involved computing the individual content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-wide content validity index (S-CVI) for validity, and the system usability score (SUS) for usability. Thematic analysis distilled free-text responses to identify key themes.

Results:  Nine of 13 items had an I-CVI over 0.78, denoting significant relevance. The S-CVI score stood at 0.82, indicating high relevance. The SUS score was 68, representing average usability. Themes highlighted issues with the current model, development suggestions, and surgeons' concerns regarding growing reliance on digital tools in health care.

Conclusion:  Flapbot is a promising digital aid for free-flap monitoring. While it showcases notable validity and usability, improvements in functionality, usability, and accessibility are needed for broader global use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
襟翼机器人"--从全球视角审视襟翼监测聊天机器人的有效性和可用性。
背景介绍Flapbot聊天机器人可协助进行免费瓣膜监测,强调可访问性、用户友好性和全球可靠性。本研究对 Flapbot 的全球有效性和可用性进行了评估,并通过定性分析确定了未来需要改进的地方:方法:Flapbot 建立在谷歌 Dialogflow 的基础上,由国际整形外科医生进行评估。我们向国际下肢重建合作组织(INTELLECT)、国际整形外科学会联合会(ICOPLAST)和国际显微外科俱乐部发出了邀请。在同意参与的 42 位外科医生中,有 21 位对 Flapbot 进行了测试,并完成了有关其有效性和可用性的在线调查。调查包括 13 个有效性项目和 10 个可用性项目。数据分析包括计算有效性的个人内容有效性指数(I-CVI)和全量表内容有效性指数(S-CVI),以及可用性的系统可用性分数(SUS)。主题分析对自由文本回复进行了提炼,以确定关键主题:在 13 个项目中,有 9 个项目的 I-CVI 超过 0.78,表示相关性很强。S-CVI 得分为 0.82,表示相关性很高。SUS 得分为 68 分,表示可用性一般。主题强调了当前模型的问题、开发建议以及外科医生对医疗保健领域日益依赖数字工具的担忧:Flapbot是一种很有前景的游离皮瓣监测数字辅助工具。结论:Flapbot 是一种很有前途的游离皮瓣监测数字辅助工具,虽然它具有显著的有效性和可用性,但要在全球范围内广泛使用,还需要在功能、可用性和可访问性方面进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Free Fasciocutaneous versus Muscle Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Implications for Functionality and Quality of Life. Utilizing Perforator Propeller Flaps for Donor Site Closure: Harvesting Large Workhorse Flaps without Lingering Concerns. Oncoplastic Surgery with Volume Replacement versus Mastectomy with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Early Postoperative Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer. Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. The Vascular Anatomy and Harvesting of the Lateral Femoral Condyle Flap in Pigs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1