Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2506-1763
Kristen L Stephens, Robert G DeVito, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix
{"title":"Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Kristen L Stephens, Robert G DeVito, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix","doi":"10.1055/a-2506-1763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely implemented across many surgical practices, including autologous breast reconstruction. However, the benefits of ERAS in the morbidly obese population have yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), ICU utilization, opioid usage, cost, and flap outcomes were analyzed in patients with BMI greater than 35 before and after ERAS implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 morbidly obese patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were identified before ERAS and 18 after ERAS. There were no differences in unilateral vs bilateral or immediate vs delayed reconstruction. LOS decreased with ERAS (3.43 vs 2.06 days, p< 0.0000001). ICU utilization decreased with ERAS (0.94 vs 0.0 days, p< 0.0001). Daily and total opioid usage decreased with ERAS (41.8 vs 17.9 MME, p< 0.0001; 190.5 vs 54.7 MME, p< 0.0001). Financial metrics improved with ERAS, including decreased total cost ($33,454 vs $25,079, p = 0.0002) and increased cost margin ($4,458 vs -$8,306, p= 0.004). There were no differences in donor or recipient site outcomes including flap loss, DVT/PE, hernia/bulge, delayed wound healing, revisions, and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERAS pathways maintain benefits in the morbidly obese population undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, including decreased length of stay, ICU utilization, opioid use, and cost while maintaining successful reconstruction outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2506-1763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely implemented across many surgical practices, including autologous breast reconstruction. However, the benefits of ERAS in the morbidly obese population have yet to be defined.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), ICU utilization, opioid usage, cost, and flap outcomes were analyzed in patients with BMI greater than 35 before and after ERAS implementation.

Results: 35 morbidly obese patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were identified before ERAS and 18 after ERAS. There were no differences in unilateral vs bilateral or immediate vs delayed reconstruction. LOS decreased with ERAS (3.43 vs 2.06 days, p< 0.0000001). ICU utilization decreased with ERAS (0.94 vs 0.0 days, p< 0.0001). Daily and total opioid usage decreased with ERAS (41.8 vs 17.9 MME, p< 0.0001; 190.5 vs 54.7 MME, p< 0.0001). Financial metrics improved with ERAS, including decreased total cost ($33,454 vs $25,079, p = 0.0002) and increased cost margin ($4,458 vs -$8,306, p= 0.004). There were no differences in donor or recipient site outcomes including flap loss, DVT/PE, hernia/bulge, delayed wound healing, revisions, and blood loss.

Conclusion: ERAS pathways maintain benefits in the morbidly obese population undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, including decreased length of stay, ICU utilization, opioid use, and cost while maintaining successful reconstruction outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. The Vascular Anatomy and Harvesting of the Lateral Femoral Condyle Flap in Pigs. Optimal Vasodilators in Microsurgery and Their Effects on Blood Vessels. Antithrombotic Agents after Free Tissue Transfer in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population. One Size Does Not Fit All: Prediction of Nerve Length in Implant-based Nipple-Areola Complex Neurotization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1