Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2506-1763
Kristen L Stephens, Robert G DeVito, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix
{"title":"Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Kristen L Stephens, Robert G DeVito, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix","doi":"10.1055/a-2506-1763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely implemented across many surgical practices, including autologous breast reconstruction. However, the benefits of ERAS in the morbidly obese population have yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, opioid usage, cost, and flap outcomes were analyzed in patients with body mass index greater than 35 before and after ERAS implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Thirty-five morbidly obese patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were identified before ERAS and 18 after ERAS. There were no differences in unilateral versus bilateral or immediate versus delayed reconstruction. LOS decreased with ERAS (3.43 vs. 2.06 days, <i>p</i> < 0.0000001). ICU utilization decreased with ERAS (0.94 vs. 0.0 days, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Daily and total opioid usage decreased with ERAS (41.8 vs. 17.9 morphine milligram equivalent [MME], <i>p</i> < 0.0001; 190.5 vs. 54.7 MME, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Financial metrics improved with ERAS, including decreased total cost ($33,454 vs. $25,079, <i>p</i> = 0.0002) and increased cost margin ($4,458 vs. -$8,306, <i>p</i> = 0.004). There were no differences in donor or recipient site outcomes including flap loss, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hernia/bulge, delayed wound healing, revisions, and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> ERAS pathways maintain benefits in the morbidly obese population undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, including decreased LOS, ICU utilization, opioid use, and cost while maintaining successful reconstruction outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2506-1763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely implemented across many surgical practices, including autologous breast reconstruction. However, the benefits of ERAS in the morbidly obese population have yet to be defined.

Methods:  A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, opioid usage, cost, and flap outcomes were analyzed in patients with body mass index greater than 35 before and after ERAS implementation.

Results:  Thirty-five morbidly obese patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were identified before ERAS and 18 after ERAS. There were no differences in unilateral versus bilateral or immediate versus delayed reconstruction. LOS decreased with ERAS (3.43 vs. 2.06 days, p < 0.0000001). ICU utilization decreased with ERAS (0.94 vs. 0.0 days, p < 0.0001). Daily and total opioid usage decreased with ERAS (41.8 vs. 17.9 morphine milligram equivalent [MME], p < 0.0001; 190.5 vs. 54.7 MME, p < 0.0001). Financial metrics improved with ERAS, including decreased total cost ($33,454 vs. $25,079, p = 0.0002) and increased cost margin ($4,458 vs. -$8,306, p = 0.004). There were no differences in donor or recipient site outcomes including flap loss, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hernia/bulge, delayed wound healing, revisions, and blood loss.

Conclusion:  ERAS pathways maintain benefits in the morbidly obese population undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, including decreased LOS, ICU utilization, opioid use, and cost while maintaining successful reconstruction outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病态肥胖患者行游离皮瓣乳房重建术后增强恢复的效果。
背景:手术后增强恢复(ERAS)途径已广泛应用于许多外科实践,包括自体乳房重建。然而,在病态肥胖人群中,ERAS的益处还有待确定。方法:回顾性分析我院2017年至2022年行腹下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建术的患者资料。对实施ERAS前后BMI大于35的患者的住院时间(LOS)、ICU使用率、阿片类药物使用、费用和皮瓣结果进行分析。结果:35例病态肥胖患者行DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术,ERAS术前确诊,ERAS后确诊18例。单侧重建与双侧重建或立即重建与延迟重建没有差异。LOS随ERAS降低(3.43 vs 2.06天,p< 0.0000001)。ICU使用率随ERAS降低(0.94 vs 0.0天,p< 0.0001)。每日阿片类药物使用量和总使用量随ERAS降低(41.8比17.9 MME, p< 0.0001;190.5 vs 54.7 MME, p< 0.0001)。ERAS改善了财务指标,包括总成本降低(33,454美元vs 25,079美元,p= 0.0002)和成本利润率提高(4,458美元vs - 8,306美元,p= 0.004)。供体和受体部位的结果没有差异,包括皮瓣丢失、DVT/PE、疝/凸起、伤口愈合延迟、修复和失血。结论:ERAS途径在进行腹部自体乳房重建的病态肥胖人群中保持了益处,包括住院时间、ICU使用率、阿片类药物使用和成本的减少,同时保持了成功的重建结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells-derived Exosomes Promote Survival of Random Flaps in Rats through Nrf2-mediated Antioxidative Stress. The Impact of Intraoperative Vasopressor Use and Fluid Status on Flap Survival in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction. Lymphatic Patterns in the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap. The "Flapbot": A Global Perspective on the Validity and Usability of a Flap Monitoring Chatbot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1