2023 Survey on User Experience of Artificial Intelligence Software in Radiology by the Korean Society of Radiology.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Korean Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3348/kjr.2023.1246
Eui Jin Hwang, Ji Eun Park, Kyoung Doo Song, Dong Hyun Yang, Kyung Won Kim, June-Goo Lee, Jung Hyun Yoon, Kyunghwa Han, Dong Hyun Kim, Hwiyoung Kim, Chang Min Park
{"title":"2023 Survey on User Experience of Artificial Intelligence Software in Radiology by the Korean Society of Radiology.","authors":"Eui Jin Hwang, Ji Eun Park, Kyoung Doo Song, Dong Hyun Yang, Kyung Won Kim, June-Goo Lee, Jung Hyun Yoon, Kyunghwa Han, Dong Hyun Kim, Hwiyoung Kim, Chang Min Park","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2023.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Korea, radiology has been positioned towards the early adoption of artificial intelligence-based software as medical devices (AI-SaMDs); however, little is known about the current usage, implementation, and future needs of AI-SaMDs. We surveyed the current trends and expectations for AI-SaMDs among members of the Korean Society of Radiology (KSR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An anonymous and voluntary online survey was open to all KSR members between April 17 and May 15, 2023. The survey was focused on the experiences of using AI-SaMDs, patterns of usage, levels of satisfaction, and expectations regarding the use of AI-SaMDs, including the roles of the industry, government, and KSR regarding the clinical use of AI-SaMDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 370 respondents (response rate: 7.7% [370/4792]; 340 board-certified radiologists; 210 from academic institutions), 60.3% (223/370) had experience using AI-SaMDs. The two most common use-case of AI-SaMDs among the respondents were lesion detection (82.1%, 183/223), lesion diagnosis/classification (55.2%, 123/223), with the target imaging modalities being plain radiography (62.3%, 139/223), CT (42.6%, 95/223), mammography (29.1%, 65/223), and MRI (28.7%, 64/223). Most users were satisfied with AI-SaMDs (67.6% [115/170, for improvement of patient management] to 85.1% [189/222, for performance]). Regarding the expansion of clinical applications, most respondents expressed a preference for AI-SaMDs to assist in detection/diagnosis (77.0%, 285/370) and to perform automated measurement/quantification (63.5%, 235/370). Most respondents indicated that future development of AI-SaMDs should focus on improving practice efficiency (81.9%, 303/370) and quality (71.4%, 264/370). Overall, 91.9% of the respondents (340/370) agreed that there is a need for education or guidelines driven by the KSR regarding the use of AI-SaMDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The penetration rate of AI-SaMDs in clinical practice and the corresponding satisfaction levels were high among members of the KSR. Most AI-SaMDs have been used for lesion detection, diagnosis, and classification. Most respondents requested KSR-driven education or guidelines on the use of AI-SaMDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"25 7","pages":"613-622"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.1246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In Korea, radiology has been positioned towards the early adoption of artificial intelligence-based software as medical devices (AI-SaMDs); however, little is known about the current usage, implementation, and future needs of AI-SaMDs. We surveyed the current trends and expectations for AI-SaMDs among members of the Korean Society of Radiology (KSR).

Materials and methods: An anonymous and voluntary online survey was open to all KSR members between April 17 and May 15, 2023. The survey was focused on the experiences of using AI-SaMDs, patterns of usage, levels of satisfaction, and expectations regarding the use of AI-SaMDs, including the roles of the industry, government, and KSR regarding the clinical use of AI-SaMDs.

Results: Among the 370 respondents (response rate: 7.7% [370/4792]; 340 board-certified radiologists; 210 from academic institutions), 60.3% (223/370) had experience using AI-SaMDs. The two most common use-case of AI-SaMDs among the respondents were lesion detection (82.1%, 183/223), lesion diagnosis/classification (55.2%, 123/223), with the target imaging modalities being plain radiography (62.3%, 139/223), CT (42.6%, 95/223), mammography (29.1%, 65/223), and MRI (28.7%, 64/223). Most users were satisfied with AI-SaMDs (67.6% [115/170, for improvement of patient management] to 85.1% [189/222, for performance]). Regarding the expansion of clinical applications, most respondents expressed a preference for AI-SaMDs to assist in detection/diagnosis (77.0%, 285/370) and to perform automated measurement/quantification (63.5%, 235/370). Most respondents indicated that future development of AI-SaMDs should focus on improving practice efficiency (81.9%, 303/370) and quality (71.4%, 264/370). Overall, 91.9% of the respondents (340/370) agreed that there is a need for education or guidelines driven by the KSR regarding the use of AI-SaMDs.

Conclusion: The penetration rate of AI-SaMDs in clinical practice and the corresponding satisfaction levels were high among members of the KSR. Most AI-SaMDs have been used for lesion detection, diagnosis, and classification. Most respondents requested KSR-driven education or guidelines on the use of AI-SaMDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023 年韩国放射学会放射学人工智能软件用户体验调查。
目的:在韩国,放射学已被定位为早期采用基于人工智能的软件作为医疗设备(AI-SaMDs);然而,人们对 AI-SaMDs 的当前使用情况、实施情况和未来需求知之甚少。我们调查了韩国放射学会(KSR)会员对人工智能医疗设备的当前趋势和期望:我们在 2023 年 4 月 17 日至 5 月 15 日期间对韩国放射学会的所有会员进行了匿名自愿在线调查。调查的重点是使用 AI-SaMD 的经验、使用模式、满意度以及对使用 AI-SaMD 的期望,包括行业、政府和 KSR 在临床使用 AI-SaMD 方面的作用:结果:在 370 位受访者中(回复率为 7.7% [370/1900])结果:在 370 名受访者中(回复率:7.7% [370/4792];340 名经委员会认证的放射科医生;210 名来自学术机构),60.3%(223/370)的受访者有使用 AI-SaMDs 的经验。受访者使用 AI-SaMDs 最常见的两种情况是病变检测(82.1%,183/223)和病变诊断/分类(55.2%,123/223),目标成像模式是普通放射摄影(62.3%,139/223)、CT(42.6%,95/223)、乳腺放射摄影(29.1%,65/223)和核磁共振成像(28.7%,64/223)。大多数用户对 AI-SaMDs 表示满意(67.6%[115/170,改善患者管理]至 85.1%[189/222,性能])。关于临床应用的扩展,大多数受访者表示更倾向于使用人工智能-SaMDs协助检测/诊断(77.0%,285/370)和进行自动测量/量化(63.5%,235/370)。大多数受访者表示,人工智能大规模杀伤性武器的未来发展应侧重于提高实践效率(81.9%,303/370)和质量(71.4%,264/370)。总体而言,91.9%的受访者(340/370)同意有必要由 KSR 推动关于使用人工智能医疗设备的教育或指导方针:结论:在 KSR 成员中,AI-SaMD 在临床实践中的普及率和相应的满意度都很高。大多数 AI-SaMD 已用于病变检测、诊断和分类。大多数受访者要求由 KSR 推动有关使用 AI-SaMD 的教育或指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Oncologic Outcomes of Heat-Based Thermal Ablation and Cryoablation in Patients With T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the SEER Database. Determining Disease Activity and Glucocorticoid Response in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: Preliminary Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Endovascular Treatment With Targeted Embolization of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Single-Center Study. Growth and Clinical Impact of Subsolid Lung Nodules ≥6 mm During Long-Term Follow-Up After Five Years of Stability. Prostate Cancer Screening With MRI: Lessons Learned From Repeat Rounds of the GÖTEBORG-2 and STHLM3-MRI Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1