Ajaikumar Sukumaran , R. Arun Krishnan, Dhanesh Mandam Kulathil, P.R. Haritha, T.N. Varun, Biby T. Edwin, K.V. Sarath, Jofy K. Paul, C.S. Satheesh Kumar, D.M. Vasudevan
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Dengue NS1 lateral flow immunoassay in comparison to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and enzyme linked Immunosorbent Assay","authors":"Ajaikumar Sukumaran , R. Arun Krishnan, Dhanesh Mandam Kulathil, P.R. Haritha, T.N. Varun, Biby T. Edwin, K.V. Sarath, Jofy K. Paul, C.S. Satheesh Kumar, D.M. Vasudevan","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.114991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The most widely used invitro diagnostic qualitative screening method for dengue virus infection is the lateral flow immunoassay technique. Testing of dengue non-structural antigen NS1 offers specificity in determining the active infection while testing of IgM and IgG helps in differentiating the primary and secondary dengue infections. The ELISA functions as the golden standard for dengue testing and PCR credits for the most accurate determination tool at the genetic level. The RT-PCR endorsed NS1 gene and in ELISA or LFIA NS1 antigen is used as the marker owing to the specificity and lesser chances of mutation effects. This study evaluated the performance of AG-Q Dengue NS1 LFIA kit in comparison with RT-PCR quantification cycle (Cq) Values and ELISA NS1 quantitation. The study also focused on differentiating the samples among dengue serotypes using the RealStar Dengue Type RT-PCR Kit 1.0. Dengue serotype 2 is the prominent viral strain in Kerala region succeeded by serotype 3 and 1 with a prevalence rate of 64 %, 20 % and 6 % respectively. Dengue serotype 4 was not reported during this study period. 10 % co-infection with DENV 1 & DENV 2 was also reported. The AG-Q Dengue NS1 kit stood as efficient in screening by providing positive results with samples having RT-PCR Cq values up to 43 and ELISA NS1 quantification minimum of 14 Panbio units.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"329 ","pages":"Article 114991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093424001150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The most widely used invitro diagnostic qualitative screening method for dengue virus infection is the lateral flow immunoassay technique. Testing of dengue non-structural antigen NS1 offers specificity in determining the active infection while testing of IgM and IgG helps in differentiating the primary and secondary dengue infections. The ELISA functions as the golden standard for dengue testing and PCR credits for the most accurate determination tool at the genetic level. The RT-PCR endorsed NS1 gene and in ELISA or LFIA NS1 antigen is used as the marker owing to the specificity and lesser chances of mutation effects. This study evaluated the performance of AG-Q Dengue NS1 LFIA kit in comparison with RT-PCR quantification cycle (Cq) Values and ELISA NS1 quantitation. The study also focused on differentiating the samples among dengue serotypes using the RealStar Dengue Type RT-PCR Kit 1.0. Dengue serotype 2 is the prominent viral strain in Kerala region succeeded by serotype 3 and 1 with a prevalence rate of 64 %, 20 % and 6 % respectively. Dengue serotype 4 was not reported during this study period. 10 % co-infection with DENV 1 & DENV 2 was also reported. The AG-Q Dengue NS1 kit stood as efficient in screening by providing positive results with samples having RT-PCR Cq values up to 43 and ELISA NS1 quantification minimum of 14 Panbio units.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery.
The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of:
Viral components and morphology-
Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors-
Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals-
Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses-
Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment-
Viral metagenomics and virome-
Virus ecology, adaption and evolution-
Applied virology such as nanotechnology-
Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation.
We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.