Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07633-2

Auwal Abdullahi, Thomson W L Wong, Shamay S M Ng

{"title":"Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Auwal Abdullahi, Thomson W L Wong, Shamay S M Ng","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07633-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Home-based rehabilitation is a cost-effective means of making services available for patients. The aim of this study is to determine the evidence in the literature on the effects of home-based neurostimulation in patients with stroke.Method: We searched PubMED, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials on the subject matter using keywords such as stroke, electrical stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Information on participants' characteristics and mean scores on the outcomes of interest were extracted. Risks of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using Cochrane Risks of bias tool and PEDro scale respectively. The data was analyzed using both narrative and quantitative syntheses. In the quantitative synthesis, meta-analysis was carried out using random effect model analysis.Result: The results showed that, home-based neurostimulation is superior to the control at improving upper limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.32, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.65 to 0.14, p = 0.003) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) post intervention; and upper limb motor function (SMD = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.10 to 1.70, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.56 to -0.05, p = 0.02) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) at follow-up.Conclusions: Home-based neurostimulation can be used to improve upper and lower limb function after stroke.","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5157-5179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07633-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Home-based rehabilitation is a cost-effective means of making services available for patients. The aim of this study is to determine the evidence in the literature on the effects of home-based neurostimulation in patients with stroke.

Method: We searched PubMED, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials on the subject matter using keywords such as stroke, electrical stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Information on participants' characteristics and mean scores on the outcomes of interest were extracted. Risks of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using Cochrane Risks of bias tool and PEDro scale respectively. The data was analyzed using both narrative and quantitative syntheses. In the quantitative synthesis, meta-analysis was carried out using random effect model analysis.

Result: The results showed that, home-based neurostimulation is superior to the control at improving upper limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.32, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.65 to 0.14, p = 0.003) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) post intervention; and upper limb motor function (SMD = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.10 to 1.70, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.56 to -0.05, p = 0.02) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) at follow-up.

Conclusions: Home-based neurostimulation can be used to improve upper and lower limb function after stroke.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

家庭神经刺激对中风后疗效的影响：系统综述和荟萃分析。

背景：家庭康复是为患者提供服务的一种具有成本效益的方法。本研究旨在确定有关中风患者家庭神经刺激效果的文献证据：我们使用中风、电刺激和经颅直流电刺激等关键词在 PubMED、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 CENTRAL 中检索了相关主题的随机对照试验。提取了参与者的特征信息和相关结果的平均得分。纳入研究的偏倚风险和方法学质量分别采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 PEDro 量表进行评估。数据分析采用叙述性综合和定量综合两种方法。在定量综合中，采用随机效应模型分析法进行了荟萃分析：结果显示，在改善上肢肌力（SMD = 0.72，95% CI = 0.08 至 1.32，p = 0.03）、功能活动度（SMD = -0.39，95% CI = -0.65 至 0.14，p = 0.003）和行走耐力（SMD = 0.33，95% CI = 0.干预后；随访时上肢运动功能（SMD = 0.9，95% CI = 0.10 至 1.70，p = 0.03）、功能活动度（SMD = -0.30，95% CI = -0.56 至 -0.05，p = 0.02）和行走耐力（SMD = 0.33，95% CI = 0.08 至 0.59，p = 0.01）：结论：家庭神经刺激可用于改善中风后的上下肢功能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

3.00%

发文量

743

审稿时长

4 months

期刊介绍： Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.