Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on motor function in patients with spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/NRE-240057
Changpiao Shi, Yi Chen, Liang Ye, Jun Feng, Guoli Dong, Shangbo Lu
{"title":"Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on motor function in patients with spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Changpiao Shi, Yi Chen, Liang Ye, Jun Feng, Guoli Dong, Shangbo Lu","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been suggested that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the evidence is mainly based on case reports.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the influence of transcutaneous SCS on extremity motor function of patients with SCI in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating the impact of the potential heterogeneity. The most recent database search was conducted on December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six small-scale open-label or single-blind RCTs were included. Transcutaneous SCS on the basis of conventional rehabilitation could significantly improve limb strength (mean difference: 4.82, p = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and attenuate spasticity (MD: -0.40, p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). The upper-extremity motor function was not significantly affected (p = 0.75). However, transcutaneous SCS significantly improved mobility as indicated by walking speed (MD: 0.13 m/s, p = 0.009; I2 = 0%) and walking distance (standardized MD: 0.62, I2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcutaneous SCS is effective in improving limb strength, spasticity and mobility of patients with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"54 4","pages":"563-573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the evidence is mainly based on case reports.

Objective: To summarize the influence of transcutaneous SCS on extremity motor function of patients with SCI in a meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating the impact of the potential heterogeneity. The most recent database search was conducted on December 31, 2023.

Results: Six small-scale open-label or single-blind RCTs were included. Transcutaneous SCS on the basis of conventional rehabilitation could significantly improve limb strength (mean difference: 4.82, p = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and attenuate spasticity (MD: -0.40, p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). The upper-extremity motor function was not significantly affected (p = 0.75). However, transcutaneous SCS significantly improved mobility as indicated by walking speed (MD: 0.13 m/s, p = 0.009; I2 = 0%) and walking distance (standardized MD: 0.62, I2 = 0%).

Conclusion: Transcutaneous SCS is effective in improving limb strength, spasticity and mobility of patients with SCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮脊髓刺激对脊髓损伤患者运动功能的影响:荟萃分析。
背景:有人认为经皮脊髓刺激(SCS)对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的康复有效。然而,这些证据主要基于病例报告:通过荟萃分析总结经皮脊髓刺激对 SCI 患者四肢运动功能的影响:在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science、万方和CNKI等电子数据库中进行了系统性文献检索,以获得相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过考虑潜在异质性的影响,采用随机效应模型对结果进行汇总。最新的数据库搜索于2023年12月31日进行:结果:共纳入六项小型开放标签或单盲 RCT。在传统康复基础上进行经皮 SCS 治疗可显著改善肢体力量(平均差:4.82,P = 0.004;I2 = 0%),减轻痉挛(MD:-0.40,P = 0.02;I2 = 0%)。上肢运动功能未受到明显影响(p = 0.75)。然而,经皮 SCS 显著改善了行走速度(MD:0.13 m/s,p = 0.009;I2 = 0%)和行走距离(标准化 MD:0.62,I2 = 0%)的活动能力:结论:经皮 SCS 可有效改善 SCI 患者的肢体力量、痉挛和活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Effect of chest expansion resistance exercise and respiratory muscle stretching on respiratory function and gait endurance in patients with stroke. Spontaneous eye blinking as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in disorders of consciousness: Protocol of an international multicentre longitudinal study. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises. Research, education and practice of tele-neurorehabilitation in low and middle-income countries: A Scoping Review. The role of nutrition in mild traumatic brain injury rehabilitation for service members and veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1