Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.3233/NRE-240027

Onur Engin, Ayşe Sezgi Kızılırmak Karataş, Betül Taşpınar, Ferruh Taşpınar

{"title":"Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.","authors":"Onur Engin, Ayşe Sezgi Kızılırmak Karataş, Betül Taşpınar, Ferruh Taşpınar","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: YouTube has emerged as an important source for obtaining information regarding health issues.Objective: The study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of facial paralysis exercise videos that are accessible on the YouTube platform.Methods: The investigation was carried out on Youtube, utilizing the keyword \"facial paralysis exercises\". We listed the first 100 videos based on relevancy. The quality and reliability of the videos were assessed using DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Power Index (VPI).Results: Out of 100 studies, we excluded 52 and included the remaining 48. The scores we obtained for the videos were as follows: DISCERN Quality (2.92±0.91), DISCERN Total (39.16±6.75), JAMA (2.09±0.55), and GQS (3.00±0.89). Our study also revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN total, JAMA and VPI scores compared to those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.018, 0.001 and 0.023, respectively). Additionally, we observed a positive and statistically significant correlation between the DISCERN quality score, total score, JAMA, and video features.Conclusion: The facial paralysis exercise videos were determined to be of medium to low quality. Higher-quality videos need to be produced.","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: YouTube has emerged as an important source for obtaining information regarding health issues.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of facial paralysis exercise videos that are accessible on the YouTube platform.

Methods: The investigation was carried out on Youtube, utilizing the keyword "facial paralysis exercises". We listed the first 100 videos based on relevancy. The quality and reliability of the videos were assessed using DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Power Index (VPI).

Results: Out of 100 studies, we excluded 52 and included the remaining 48. The scores we obtained for the videos were as follows: DISCERN Quality (2.92±0.91), DISCERN Total (39.16±6.75), JAMA (2.09±0.55), and GQS (3.00±0.89). Our study also revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN total, JAMA and VPI scores compared to those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.018, 0.001 and 0.023, respectively). Additionally, we observed a positive and statistically significant correlation between the DISCERN quality score, total score, JAMA, and video features.

Conclusion: The facial paralysis exercise videos were determined to be of medium to low quality. Higher-quality videos need to be produced.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对 YouTube 视频作为面瘫练习信息来源的评估。

背景：YouTube 已成为获取健康问题信息的重要来源：YouTube已成为获取健康问题相关信息的重要来源：本研究旨在评估 YouTube 平台上提供的面瘫锻炼视频的可靠性和质量：调查在 Youtube 上进行，关键词为 "面瘫锻炼"。我们根据相关性列出了前 100 个视频。我们使用 DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》（JAMA）基准标准、全球质量量表（GQS）和视频功率指数（VPI）对视频的质量和可靠性进行了评估：在 100 项研究中，我们排除了 52 项，纳入了其余 48 项。我们获得的视频评分如下：DISCERN 质量 (2.92±0.91)、DISCERN 总分 (39.16±6.75)、JAMA (2.09±0.55) 和 GQS (3.00±0.89)。我们的研究还显示，与非医护专业人员上传的视频相比，医护专业人员上传的视频的 DISCERN 总分、JAMA 和 VPI 分数明显更高（p = 0.018、0.001 和 0.023）。此外，我们还观察到 DISCERN 质量得分、总分、JAMA 和视频特征之间存在统计学意义上的正相关：结论：面瘫锻炼视频被确定为中低质量。需要制作更高质量的视频。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

178

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.