The maintenance and interface of two wheelchairs used by children with cerebral palsy in Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Abstract

Current wheelchairs used in low-resource settings lack the adjustability required for children with cerebral palsy and are not well-suited for rough terrain environments. This study aimed to examine the durability and functional interface of two wheelchairs specifically designed for use in low-resource settings. This descriptive study assessed 14 wheelchairs used by children with cerebral palsy living in Kenya, Africa (Momentum Wheels for Humanity's Liberty II wheelchair n = 6, Beeline's Honey Bee wheelchair n = 8). Four physical and occupational therapists evaluated durability using the Wheelchair Components Questionnaire (WCQ) and functionality using the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire (WIQ). Medians were used to compare differences in the chair types using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) 9.4 with an alpha = 0.05. Median scores on the WCQ were 8.3/10 for the Liberty II and 7.8/10 for Beeline's Honey Bee wheelchair; however, the durability of the wheel locks was lower in the Beeline wheelchair (5.1/10 compared to the Liberty II 8.1/10 (p = 0.002). Median scores on the WIQ were lower and significantly different in the area of preventing distal lower extremity pain (Liberty II =3.7/10 and Beeline = 7.6/10, p = 0.045). Low scores occurred in both chairs in the areas of transfers and transporting the chairs in the community. The Beeline wheelchairs demonstrated higher average ratings for all areas of the WIQ, indicating the wheelchairs fit the children better and were more functional for use in the home and community environment.