On the scientific credibility of paleoanthropology: Reply to Villmoare and Kimbel

IF 4.6 2区社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1002/evan.22041

Richard J. Smith, Bernard Wood

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smith and Wood reply to Villmoare and Kimbel regarding the scientific credibility of problems in paleoanthropology that require causal explanations for unique historical events.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

关于古人类学的科学可信性：答复 Villmoare 和 Kimbel。

史密斯和伍德就古人类学中需要对独特历史事件做出因果解释的问题的科学可信性回答了 Villmoare 和 Kimbel。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Evolutionary Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

7.00

自引率

5.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Evolutionary Anthropology is an authoritative review journal that focuses on issues of current interest in biological anthropology, paleoanthropology, archaeology, functional morphology, social biology, and bone biology — including dentition and osteology — as well as human biology, genetics, and ecology. In addition to lively, well-illustrated articles reviewing contemporary research efforts, this journal also publishes general news of relevant developments in the scientific, social, or political arenas. Reviews of noteworthy new books are also included, as are letters to the editor and listings of various conferences. The journal provides a valuable source of current information for classroom teaching and research activities in evolutionary anthropology.

期刊最新文献

A biochronological date of 3.6 million years for "Little Foot" (StW 573, Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein, South Africa). The evolutionary origin of human kissing. Issue Information Issue Information Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.